Samsung's 9100 Pro SSD boasts 14.8 GB/s read speeds, making it the world's fastest consumer drive

Samsung 9100 Pro
(Image credit: Samsung)

Samsung is finally getting into the high performance PCIe 5.0 storage game, two years after the first PCIe 5.0 SSDs arrived. The Korean phone and storage maker unveiled its first "true" PCIe 5.0 SSD, the 9100 Pro, which delivers full PCIe 5.0 speeds. Samsung's new M.2 NVMe SSD is capable of read speeds of up to 14.8 GB/s. Pricing will start at $199.99, and the drive comes with a 5-year warranty.

The new drive is built on a revised version of Samsung's TLC V8 V-NAND flash and utilizes the company's homebrewed "Presto" SSD controller. The main selling point of the drive is its full PCIe 5.0 interface, packing four lanes and sporting the NVMe 2.0 protocol. Samsung's previous 990 EVO and 990 EVO Plus drives could operate in either PCIe 4.0 x4 mode, or PCIe 5.0 x2 mode, so they're only half as fast in terms of maximum bandwidth as "true" 5.0 x4 drives.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Aaron Klotz
Contributing Writer

Aaron Klotz is a contributing writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering news related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.

  • Jame5
    I would love to see a head-to-head between this and the Micron 4600, or any other new SM2508 powered drive.
    Reply
  • kaalus
    What's the point if Windows won't delete more than about 100 files per second anyway?
    Reply
  • bit_user
    @JarredWaltonGPU & @PaulAlcorn ,

    Can you please ask whoever reviews this to measure power consumption (active idle + under load) at PCIe 4.0 speeds, as well? I found that sadly lacking from two other PCIe 5.0 drives recently reviewed:
    https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/ssds/addlink-g55-ssd-review/2 https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/ssds/corsair-mp700-elite-ssd-review/2
    I don't care so much about performance at PCIe 4.0 speeds, just want to know how much less power it uses. Just running the 50 GB folder copy tests @ PCIe 4.0 (as well as 5.0, obviously) would be enough for me.

    Thanks!
    Reply
  • bit_user
    kaalus said:
    What's the point if Windows won't delete more than about 100 files per second anyway?
    That's probably due to your antivirus and it's doing per-file scanning.

    For games, they should be able to avoid that overhead by holding open their data files and just seeking around in them. Game loading benchmarks clearly show that some games are certainly influenced by SSD speeds.

    Also, large file reads or copies depend on SSD speed. These can include things like reading AI models, loading VM images, and performing VM snapshots.

    Another thing you can do is to disable antivirus for certain directories. Software developers often do this, in the area where they checkout their source code and perform builds. Otherwise, performance is too heavily impacted.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    bit_user said:
    @JarredWaltonGPU & @PaulAlcorn ,

    Can you please ask whoever reviews this to measure power consumption (active idle + under load) at PCIe 4.0 speeds, as well? I found that sadly lacking from two other PCIe 5.0 drives recently reviewed:
    https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/ssds/addlink-g55-ssd-review/2https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/ssds/corsair-mp700-elite-ssd-review/2
    I don't care so much about performance at PCIe 4.0 speeds, just want to know how much less power it uses. Just running the 50 GB folder copy tests @ PCIe 4.0 (as well as 5.0, obviously) would be enough for me.

    Thanks!
    I'm actually the one doing the testing, with Shane writing the reviews. I mostly don't test at slower speeds because it just takes more time. The 2230 drives are already a pain in the neck, since I test them at PCIe 3.0 plus "maximum" (4.0 in all cases so far) performance mode. I'm trying to avoid committing to doing that on any more drives. LOL

    But it would be good to at least run some power numbers for kicks and information on the PCIe 5.0 drives. Sigh. Probably just stick to the power and forget about everything else. Only the bursty workloads will really show much difference, regardless.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    Jame5 said:
    I would love to see a head-to-head between this and the Micron 4600, or any other new SM2508 powered drive.
    Coming soon! Well, as soon as we get a Samsung drive. The Micron 4600 review is in the works. I have been a bit (only a wee bit!) overloaded with all the GPU stuff... but the Micron testing is now nearly finished.

    SPOILERS! LOL:
    391
    390
    389
    388
    Performance was slightly worse on the file copy in PCIe 4.0 mode, FYI, but overall efficiency improved. This is without enabling all of the maximum power savings features in the BIOS (ASPM, specifically), so idle power is the drive not doing anything but also not in full sleep mode. (Most SSDs drop to ~50mW in full sleep mode, I believe.)
    Reply
  • nitrium
    QD1 4K reads still largely dictate the actual "real world feel" of an SSD. Unfortunately, that has barely changed in the last 5 years, despite massive QD32 benchmarks that only highlight very specific scenarios usually not relevant to the average consumer.
    Reply
  • SomeoneElse23
    kaalus said:
    What's the point if Windows won't delete more than about 100 files per second anyway?
    Windows Exploder, now known as File Exploder, is terribly inefficient at, well, everything.
    Reply
  • Mr Majestyk
    $200 for 1TB. That's so pathetic in fact it would be pathetic for 2TB, but Tom's will give it the gold star and claim it's the best ssd in history, like all Samsung drives before it.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    Mr Majestyk said:
    $200 for 1TB. That's so pathetic in fact it would be pathetic for 2TB, but Tom's will give it the gold star and claim it's the best ssd in history, like all Samsung drives before it.
    Each generation starts out "expensive".

    Used to be, a 250GB SATA III SSD was $200.
    Reply