Adata Swordfish M.2 NVMe SSD Review: Affordable, Secure Storage

The Swordfish combines a low cost per gigabyte with solid performance and hardware encryption.

Adata Swordfish M.2 NVMe SSD
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

Adata’s swordfish isn’t the most responsive SSD out there, but it looks great and comes with AES 256-bit encryption support at a very low price.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Low cost

  • +

    Large SLC write cache

  • +

    Sleek aesthetic

  • +

    AES 256-bit encryption

  • +

    5-year warranty

  • +

    SSD Toolbox and cloning software

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Slow write performance after the SLC cache fills

  • -

    Endurance is lower than average

  • -

    Could use further power optimization

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Adata’s Swordfish is an entry-level NVMe SSD built for creatives and gamers looking for faster-than-SATA performance, without spending a whole lot. Powered by Realtek’s entry-level NVMe SSD controller, it offers up sequential performance of up to 1.8 GBps and comes with support for AES 256-bit encryption. With a stylish silver heatsink and black PCB, it’s quite the looker too. It’s just not the most responsive SSD out there, due to its lack of DRAM.

It’s not often that we see a low-cost M.2 NVMe SSD that supports AES 256-bit encryption, let alone one with a DRAMless architecture, but Adata’s Swordfish is just that. With Realtek’s RTS5763DL NVMe SSD controller, it not only sports this optional security support to keep your data secure, but it also hits the market at very low prices, as low as $0.10 per GB. Although the DRAMless architecture holds it back in terms of responsiveness and endurance rating, the Swordfish is still quite appealing for those looking to save a few bucks on a boot or game drive.

TOPICS
Sean Webster
Storage Reviewer

Sean is a Contributing Editor at Tom’s Hardware US, covering storage hardware.

  • kep55
    I really wonder at times if all gosh & gee whiz Tom's throws out on devices that are fractional seconds faster matters in the real world. Have any of these new & improved devices ever been tested by average Joes and not the "Let's get the highest score in Call of Duty" crowd. I noticed a definite speed increase when I went from 32-bit OS to 64-bit OS, but when I installed a SSD drive as my boot drive nothing perceptively changed. Until the SSD crashed & lost everything and absolutely NOTHING could recover the data. Thank goodness for AOMEI Backupper & WD MyCloud.
    Reply
  • mdd1963
    kep55 said:
    but when I installed a SSD drive as my boot drive nothing perceptively changed. Until the SSD crashed & lost everything and absolutely NOTHING could recover the data. Thank goodness for AOMEI Backupper & WD MyCloud.

    You had 4-5 second boot times with a spinning drive, and the same boot times after an upgrade to an SSD? Or you had 30 second boots, and same boot times after upgrade?

    (The SSD is normally a 'night and day' difference compared to a spinning drive...)
    Reply
  • kep55
    Boot time was the same. Loading applications the same. Losing everything due to a drive crash NOT the same.
    Reply
  • seanwebster
    kep55 said:
    Boot time was the same. Loading applications the same. Losing everything due to a drive crash NOT the same.
    That sounds strange. Sorry to hear about the bad experience. Everyone I upgrade noticed a difference between a SSD and HDD for everything. I even notice big responsiveness differences between even SATA and NVMe, personally. What drive/system was it? Good thing you’re smart and have backups in place!

    Sometimes people clone and forget to remove their old drives and continue to use their HDD without noticing.
    Reply
  • kep55
    It was a Samsung EVO 850 Pro. I think.
    Reply