USB 3.0 To The Front Panel: ASRock Leads The Way

890FX Deluxe4 BIOS, Overclocking And Accessories

Swipe to scroll horizontally
890FX Deluxe4 Basic O/C Settings
BIOS Version1.10 (08-25-2010)
CPU Core0.60-2.00 Volts (12.5 mV), 150-500 MHz HT Clock (1 MHz)
CPU IMC0.60-1.55 Volts (12.5 mV), 5x-31x HT Clock (1x)
Memory1.25-2.065 V (10 mV), 2x-4x HT Clock (0.66x)
Memory TimingtCL 4-12, tRCD 5-12, tRP 5-12, tRAS 15-30 Cycles (1c)
Chipset1.11-1.795 V Northbridge (15 mV), 1.105-1.505 V HT (50 mV)

A fairly broad voltage range for most settings allows overclockers to seek the highest stable clock speed from their CPU and memory.

ASRock’s overclock settings include several factory-determined profiles, along with all of the most important frequency and voltage settings. A single scroll-down menu covers just about everything the moderately-experienced overclocker might need.

A little further down the same OC Tweaker menu are three registers that can store user-configured overclocking profiles.

An unusually detailed set of memory timings are found within the Memory Timing submenu. Individual settings can be left in auto-configuration mode, to ease manual configuration of other settings.

A ten-phase voltage regulator keeps the system stable under moderate to high overclock settings, and ASRock even makes its logo removable for the installation of an included 40 mm cooling fan. Actual stability will depend on CPU specifics: while we had no voltage stability issues with our Phenom II X4 965 set at 3.84 GHz, its stability evaporated as we pushed higher voltage in an effort to reach this processor’s normal 4.0 GHz air-cooled limit.

The 890FX Deluxe4 installation kit includes four SATA cables and a two-port USB 3.0 to 3.5” bay adapter.

Thomas Soderstrom
Thomas Soderstrom is a Senior Staff Editor at Tom's Hardware US. He tests and reviews cases, cooling, memory and motherboards.
  • Thank you ASRock for bringing USB3.0 front header on your motherboards! Now i can expect a much nicer set-up in my case in an upcoming build...
    Reply
  • takeapieandrun
    New standards = competition = win for us
    Reply
  • razor512
    Now all they need to do is lead the way with a standardized case connector.
    Reply
  • darthvidor
    I sure hope the standard connector comes out before this gets out of hand.
    Reply
  • 117killer117
    Hopefully some other motherboard manufacturers catch on.
    Reply
  • Crashman
    razor512Now all they need to do is lead the way with a standardized case connector.darthvidorI sure hope the standard connector comes out before this gets out of hand.You're looking at it, Page 1 photo. Other motherboard manufacturers are already using this same connector as mentioned in the article, so it should only be a matter of a few months before case manufacturers follow suit.
    Reply
  • ASRock responds to pleas? Maybe someone could plead for dual-gigabit-ethernet equipped SOC-chipped (atom? i3?) 6x sata2 motherboards, too. It's impossible to build your one-machine-to-rule them all firewall-server-htpc in a small form factor currently!
    Reply
  • liquidsnake718
    Yeah i remember reading reports that Intel dithed USB 3.0 about 6 months ago in favor of the mb and new CPU research (P66, 67). Surprisingly they sold this tech or the design to ASROCK. Im sure they will eventually come around to implimenting this for ALL future motherboards.

    So would old cases be able to use this since it is just a connector?
    Reply
  • Crashman
    liquidsnake718Yeah i remember reading reports that Intel dithed USB 3.0 about 6 months ago in favor of the mb and new CPU research (P66, 67). Surprisingly they sold this tech or the design to ASROCK. Im sure they will eventually come around to implimenting this for ALL future motherboards. So would old cases be able to use this since it is just a connector?Revised cases could use it, if they had the new cable and connector. Remember that USB 2.0 and USB 3.0 are not cross-compatible, they use separate signal pins and share only power and ground with each other.
    Reply
  • mauller07
    They should have kept the board like the 890gx extreme 3 without all the legacy rubbish like floppy or pata, when looking at the boar layouts in comparison this extreme 4 just looks messy
    Reply