USB 3.0 To The Front Panel: ASRock Leads The Way
ASRock was the first company to respond to our impassioned pleas for a front-panel USB 3.0 connector. As other companies attempt to catch up, we examine the boards that started it all to see if the implementation maintains full USB 3.0-class performance.
Test Settings
This isn’t a motherboard roundup, but a test of ASRock’s USB 3.0 front-panel implementation. By limiting ourselves to that evaluation, we can assuage fears of bias that might result from differing CPU technologies.
Test System Configuration | |
---|---|
Socket AM3 CPU | AMD Phenom II X4 965 (3.40 GHz, 6 MB L3 Cache) Overclocked to 3.84 GHz at 240 MHz, 1.4875 V |
LGA-1156 CPU | Intel Core i7-870 (2.93 GHz, 8MB L3 Cache) Overclocked to 4.00 GHz at 200 MHz, 1.375 V |
LGA-1366 CPU | Intel Core i7-920 (2.66 GHz, 8 MB L3 Cache) Overclocked to 3.80 GHz at 200 MHz, 1.350 V |
890FX Motherboard | ASRock 890FX Deluxe4 BIOS 1.10 (08/25/2010) AMD 890FX Northbridge, SB850 Southbridge |
P55 Motherboard | ASRock P55 Extreme4 BIOS 1.42 (08/20/2010) Intel P55 Express PCH |
X58 Motherboard | ASRock X58 Extreme6 BIOS 1.00 (08/31/2010) Intel X58 Express Northbridge, ICH10R Southbridge |
Comparison Motherboard | Gigabyte X58A-UD3R BIOS FB (08/24/2010) Intel X58 Express Northbridge, ICH10R Southbridge |
RAM | Kingston KHX16000D3ULT1K3/6GX (6 GB) DDR3-2000 at DDR3-1600 CAS 7-7-7-21 |
Graphics | Sapphire Radeon HD 5850 1 GB 725 MHz GPU, GDDR5-4000 |
OS Hard Drive | Western Digital RE3 WD1002FBYS 1 TB, 7200 RPM, SATA 3Gb/s, 32 MB Cache |
Test Drive | OCZ Enyo 128 GB USB 3.0 SSD |
USB 3.0 Adapter | Integrated NEC D720200F1 PCIe 2.0 Two ports, onboard 5.0 Gb/s PCIe interface |
Sound | Integrated HD Audio |
Network | Integrated Gigabit Networking |
Power | Corsair CMPSU-850HX 850 W Modular ATX12V v2.2, EPS12V, 80 PLUS Gold |
Comparison | System Builder Marathon: TH's $2000 Hand-Picked Build |
Software | |
OS | Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate x64 |
Graphics | AMD Catalyst 10.8 |
Chipset | Intel INF 9.1.2.1007 |
Benchmarks | |
h2benchw 3.13 | Sequential and Sustained Reads, Writes (KB/s) Interface Bandwidth (MB/s), Access Times (ms) |
Iometer 2006.07.27 | Database, File Server, Web Server, Workstation Patterns (IOPS) |
Comparing the performance of each front-panel USB 3.0 implementation to that of each motherboard’s rear-panel controller wouldn’t have made this a complete test, since ASRock’s USB 3.0 controllers use a PCIe 2.0 bridge on its X58 Extreme6 and a PCIe 1.1 connection on its P55 Extreme4. While ASRock’s AMD solution appears to be well-optimized, we needed an Intel system with its USB 3.0 controlled connected directly to the X58 northbridge to set a baseline for the other two motherboards. For that we called upon our recent System Builder Marathon alternative $2000 configuration.
Because all of ASRock’s motherboards were overclocked to the limit, we left the comparison PC at its limit as well. A full rundown of its configuration can be found on its test settings page.
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
Current page: Test Settings
Prev Page X58 Extreme6 BIOS, Overclocking And Accessories Next Page Sequential Transfer Graphs-
Thank you ASRock for bringing USB3.0 front header on your motherboards! Now i can expect a much nicer set-up in my case in an upcoming build...Reply
-
Crashman razor512Now all they need to do is lead the way with a standardized case connector.darthvidorI sure hope the standard connector comes out before this gets out of hand.You're looking at it, Page 1 photo. Other motherboard manufacturers are already using this same connector as mentioned in the article, so it should only be a matter of a few months before case manufacturers follow suit.Reply -
ASRock responds to pleas? Maybe someone could plead for dual-gigabit-ethernet equipped SOC-chipped (atom? i3?) 6x sata2 motherboards, too. It's impossible to build your one-machine-to-rule them all firewall-server-htpc in a small form factor currently!Reply
-
liquidsnake718 Yeah i remember reading reports that Intel dithed USB 3.0 about 6 months ago in favor of the mb and new CPU research (P66, 67). Surprisingly they sold this tech or the design to ASROCK. Im sure they will eventually come around to implimenting this for ALL future motherboards.Reply
So would old cases be able to use this since it is just a connector?
-
Crashman liquidsnake718Yeah i remember reading reports that Intel dithed USB 3.0 about 6 months ago in favor of the mb and new CPU research (P66, 67). Surprisingly they sold this tech or the design to ASROCK. Im sure they will eventually come around to implimenting this for ALL future motherboards. So would old cases be able to use this since it is just a connector?Revised cases could use it, if they had the new cable and connector. Remember that USB 2.0 and USB 3.0 are not cross-compatible, they use separate signal pins and share only power and ground with each other.Reply -
mauller07 They should have kept the board like the 890gx extreme 3 without all the legacy rubbish like floppy or pata, when looking at the boar layouts in comparison this extreme 4 just looks messyReply