Crucial MX300 750GB SSD Review

Micron's new 3D flash comes to market first in a limited edition MX300 750GB SSD. The new drive joins Samsung's 3D with TLC in the mainstream category.

Early Verdict

For some the Crucial MX300 Limited Edition 750GB drive will be a massive disappointment. We would rather look at the potential for growth and what is around the corner. We can wait a little longer since the world isn't buying flash at a high enough rate as it is. If Crucial really wants to sell some flash it has the potential to build products that people really want to buy. Let's hope the 750GB capacity size is the starting point for 3D TLC so we can finally live the dream of high capacity flash-based storage.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    3D TLC triples the density of existing planar TLC so there will be large price reductions in time with the MX300. Hardware-enabled power fail protection for data at rest is a big plus for those that like their data.

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    The MX300 suffers from high latency and heavy disk usage to complete elementary tasks. The 5 seconds of system hang time would be impressive in a slam dunk contest. I didn't want to build that Excel chart now, anyhow.

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Specifications

Micron had a good run with 16nm planar (2D) flash, but now it's time for the company to jump on the 3D bus with Samsung and SK hynix so it can scale up density. In fact, Micron's 3D TLC NAND triples the density of today's 16nm planar flash. Looking to the future, that'll help lower SSD pricing and enable higher-capacity drives.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Chris Ramseyer
Contributor

Chris Ramseyer was a senior contributing editor for Tom's Hardware. He tested and reviewed consumer storage.

  • FCsean
    Stick with the 850 Evo I guess
    Reply
  • bit_user
    I've always done well with Crucial. Price per GB is competitive, even if their performance was middle of the pack.

    More importantly, the end-to-end error-correction offered in their MX100 and MX200 were key, for me. I don't even mind sacrificing a bit of performance, for it. I wonder if the MX300 has it?
    Reply
  • poppypl
    What was drive's firmware during tests? Was it M0CR011?
    Reply
  • mapesdhs
    Typo in the first page, "... enthusiasts should expect more options in the 2GB+ range." - I'm assuming that should be 2TB.

    Pity about the performance, I had high hopes until I started seeing the results. OTOH, some do care more about capacity and price, so it may be that Samsung and others have to lower the prices anyway if Crucial can pinch some customers away.

    One thing, does Crucial's modern SSD management tool allow one to do a secure erase without having to use a 3rd-party program or reboot the system? That wasn't the case with older models and was a big no thanks for me; always liked the way OCZ's tool could do a SE on the fly, and now Samsung's Magician can do that aswell (can't remember if SanDisk can).

    I look forward to the death of 64GB/128GB models, they're holding things back. It'd be good if 256GB could die by the end of this year aswell, but I doubt that'll happen.
    Reply
  • uglyduckling81
    Most people wouldn't know or care about the difference between a Sammy Evo drive and this. All they will see is the capacity and the price. Make it cheaper and they will come.
    Reply
  • mdd1963
    Any new rigs would seem incomplete without an M.2/NVMe capability, and, specifically, ...a Samsung 950 Pro and it's 2000+ MB/sec! (The rest of the SATA old school SSDs can battle over 500 vs 510 vs 550 Mb/sec, etc..)
    Reply
  • CaedenV
    18119633 said:
    Any new rigs would seem incomplete without an M.2/NVMe capability, and, specifically, ...a Samsung 950 Pro and it's 2000+ MB/sec! (The rest of the SATA old school SSDs can battle over 500 vs 510 vs 550 Mb/sec, etc..)

    Perhaps for you and I, but someone like my dad would love this kind of drive. Much more space than older SSDs, while still providing much faster performance than a traditional HDD, all while keeping the price down. There may be other SSDs on the market that provide a little cheaper $/GB, but I would bet that this drive will drop in price with time to reflect how it performs compared to others.
    Reply
  • Sakkura
    This SSD should either have been that bit cheaper to really compete with the planar TLC drives, or faster to move into the 850 Evo performance tier. I'm a bit disappointed that it doesn't have that kind of performance, but more disappointed still that it's not even priced properly for its performance level.

    Price drops in retail can always fix that, admittedly, but there's really not much to get excited about here. I don't understand why Micron thought this was the way to introduce their shiny new 3D NAND.
    Reply
  • cknobman
    Not cheaper.
    Slower.
    Uses more power.
    No improvement on endurance.

    Am I missing anything major here?

    I just dont see anything that is purchase worthy here.
    Reply
  • Lkaos
    Expect many improvements on the next Firmware release...
    Reply