Skip to main content

Crucial X8 Portable SSD Review: a Speedy Value

QLC helps make this a fast, affordable external.

Crucial X8 Portable SSD
Editor's Choice
(Image: © Tom's hardware)

Comparison Products

Today, we pit Crucial’s X8 against a variety of external products to gauge its performance. We have three high-end Thunderbolt 3 SSDs, the G-Technology G-Drive Mobile Pro, Samsung X5, and Plugable TB3 NVMe. Similar to the X8 with a USB 10 Gbps interface, we added in the Lexar SL100 Pro, a direct competitor. As well, we threw in the SATA based SanDisk Extreme and Seagate Backup Plus Ultra Touch for performance perspective.

Transfer Rates – DiskBench

DiskBench is a storage benchmarking tool that allows us to test the transfer or copy performance of a storage device with real data. We test external drives with three file transfers that consist of 25GB of photos (10GB of jpgs and 15GB of RAW photos), 50GB of movies, and 25GB of documents. First, we transfer each folder from a 1TB NVMe SSD to the external device; then we follow up by reading a 3.7GB 7-zip file and a 15GB movie back from the device.

Image 1 of 10

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
Image 2 of 10

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
Image 3 of 10

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
Image 4 of 10

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
Image 5 of 10

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
Image 6 of 10

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
Image 7 of 10

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
Image 8 of 10

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
Image 9 of 10

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
Image 10 of 10

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Crucial’s X8 performed well when moving files. Read performance comes in at ~900 MBps when accessing our multi-gigabyte sized test files. When writing large movie and photo files, it traded blows with the SL100 Pro and almost halved the time the SanDisk Extreme, but lagged behind when writing the smaller files in the 25GB documents file folder.

Trace Testing – PCMark 8 Storage Test 2.0

PCMark 8 is a trace-based benchmark that uses Microsoft Office, Adobe Creative Suite, World of Warcraft, and Battlefield 3 to measure the performance of storage devices in real-world scenarios.

Image 1 of 2

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
Image 2 of 2

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

With a total score of 5,036 points and average bandwidth of 374 MBps, the X8 lands right behind the Samsung X8 and ranks fourth place on this list. It also seems that the SL100 Pro is overshadowed by the X8 here. Crucial’s X8 is much more capable of responding to consumer workloads including video editing, photo manipulation, and game level loading. As we would expect, it absolutely destroys the HDD’s result as well.

Synthetics - ATTO

ATTO is a simple and free application that SSD vendors commonly use to assign sequential performance specifications to their products. It also gives us insight into how the device handles different file sizes.

Image 1 of 2

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
Image 2 of 2

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

ATTO reported peak sequential throughput numbers of 1,076 / 1,029 MBps read/write at a QD of 4. Overall, the performance is what you would expect out of a fast 10 Gbps device. It’s performance results per file size even ramp up faster than the more-expensive Lexar SL100 Pro.  

Synthetics - iometer

iometer is an advanced and highly configurable storage benchmarking tool that vendors often use to measure the performance of their devices.

Image 1 of 8

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
Image 2 of 8

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
Image 3 of 8

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
Image 4 of 8

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
Image 5 of 8

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
Image 6 of 8

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
Image 7 of 8

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
Image 8 of 8

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Using iometer we measured peak sequential performance of about 970 MBps read/write or about one third the performance of Thunderbolt 3 devices. Random performance is very good too. The X8 scores second in random read at a queue depth of one and is faster than both the Lexar SL100 Pro and SanDisk Extreme.

Sustained Sequential Write Performance & Temperature

Write speed and temperature are two important and inter-related metrics for external devices. We threw in this one last test to measure the performance of the drive over a 15-minute window, writing to the full span of the drive. This test reveals if the drive has a pseudo-SLC cache, which is a small portion of faster-programmed flash that absorbs incoming write workloads.

When possible, we also log the temperature of the drive via the S.M.A.R.T. data to see when (or if) thermal throttling kicks in and how it impacts performance. Bear in mind that results will vary based on the workload and ambient air temperature.

Image 1 of 6

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
Image 2 of 6

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
Image 3 of 6

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
Image 4 of 6

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
Image 5 of 6

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
Image 6 of 6

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

When tasked with some heavy writing, the X8 reveals its Achilles heel. While under ordinary use, the X8 will deliver a responsive performance of about 1GBps in both reads and writes, when hit with a heavy write workload, performance will suffer. Overall, the drive was able to write 197GB at a rate of 1,025MBps before write speed crashed down to an average of 100 MBps.

Like all SSDs, when the cache recovers, performance is back to business as usual. After 30 seconds of idle time, it was able to recover 18GB of write cache space and within a half-hour, it was completely empty and ready for more.

When moving around a few hundred GB of files with no airflow, the X8 hit a peak temperature of 45C on the exterior of the device. The SSD within reported a high of 53C.

MORE: Best SSDs

MORE: How We Test HDDs And SSDs

MORE: All SSD Content

  • g-unit1111
    I actually have one of these drives. It's not a bad drive but there's things about it that could definitely be improved. The Samsung drive that I have is way better.
    Reply