Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED Review: Creative Aims, But Bring the Charger With You

Strong performance and a handsome design are hamstrung by short battery life and tinny speakers.

Gigabyte Aero 14 OLED
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

Gigabyte’s creator-centric Aero 14 OLED has an impressive screen and build quality but doesn’t meet our battery-life expectations and misses small details.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Attractive aluminum chassis

  • +

    Potent performance

  • +

    Gorgeous OLED screen

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Short battery life

  • -

    RAM isn’t upgradeable

  • -

    Tinny speakers

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Gigabyte has creative aims with its Aero 14 OLED ($1,600.11 as tested) has. Inside the 14-inch chassis is a powerful Intel Core H-class processor and an Nvidia RTX 4050 graphics card with special video drivers for creative apps.

And if that’s not enough excitement, this Gigabyte also has fantastic build quality in a stylish chassis and a stunning OLED screen that will make anyone look twice. There aren’t too many laptops with screens that look this good. . 

Charles Jefferies
Freelance Reviewer

Charles Jefferies is a freelance reviewer for Tom’s Hardware US. He covers laptop and desktop PCs, especially gaming models.

  • ottonis
    What a misconstruction this laptop is. It wants to be portable, but has puny battery life and lacks meaningful I/O (not one single USB-A Port, microSD instead of regular SD card slot).
    It has only one single SSD slot...and one cannot updgrade RAM memory.

    It's hard to imagine a proper use case of this laptop.
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    The 16" version with the 4070 as mentioned briefly in the article, has the same processor, but:
    RTX 4070 8GB instead of the 4050 6GB
    DDR4-6400 user upgradable RAM instead of DDR-4800 soldered
    3840 x 2400 resolution vs 2880 x 1800
    Second NVMe slot for more storage
    An additional USB 3.2 port
    It may be $400 more, costing the same $2000 as the stated M2 Macbook Pro used in the test cost, but the spec increase is quite noticeable, especially in the GPU which is near double the specs.
    Reply
  • PixyMisa
    I wanted to love this laptop, but if you're going to solder the RAM in place at least make it 32GB. 16GB is enough for a single app - if you're lucky.

    I went for a cheaper HP model with a 1080p screen but upgradeable RAM instead. The Framework laptop was also an option but I like this keyboard layout with the Home/PgUp/PgDn/End keys on the right.
    Reply
  • dimar
    I dislike the idea of things not being repearable or upgradable such as RAM, SSD, Wi-Fi card or battery. I won't recommend these laptops to anyone. We need 3D print community to come up with materials and designs, and have manufacturers release modular parts.
    Reply