Logitech G Pro X Superlight 2 Review: Now With USB-C

I have no problem with basic. But this mouse is definitely basic.

Logitech G Pro X Superlight 2
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The G Pro X Superlight 2 is very similar to the original G Pro X Superlight — it's probably not worth upgrading, but it's worth it if you're torn between the two.

Pros

  • +

    Very light

  • +

    Comfortable for multiple grip types

  • +

    Smooth, speedy, low-latency

Cons

  • -

    No DPI switch

  • -

    Expensive

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

It's hard to beat a classic. So Logitech didn't even try: The new Logitech G Pro X Superlight 2 is basically identical to its predecessor. And by that, I mean it is identical to its predecessor, at least in size and shape. 

It does have some upgrades, however. Logitech's iconic ultra-lightweight wireless gaming mouse now has a USB-C port (frankly, the original G Pro X Superlight also should have had a USB-C port), an upgraded sensor, up to a 2,000 Hz polling rate, and hybrid optical-mechanical switches. It's also ever-so-slightly lighter (like 3 grams lighter) and gets about 25 hours more battery life (though not on the highest-performance, lowest-latency configuration, of course). 

Sarah Jacobsson Purewal
Senior Editor, Peripherals

Sarah Jacobsson Purewal is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware covering peripherals, software, and custom builds. You can find more of her work in PCWorld, Macworld, TechHive, CNET, Gizmodo, Tom's Guide, PC Gamer, Men's Health, Men's Fitness, SHAPE, Cosmopolitan, and just about everywhere else.

  • Sleepy_Hollowed
    It's absolutely bonkers that this device has no DPI button or switch to cycle through by default.

    I guess that they're putting everything in software now (I mean, they're not the only ones), but that is absolutely bonkers when almost all competitors do that.
    Reply