Round Up: Five Powerful, Light Ultraportables

Lenovo Ideapad U110: Style and Usability


Have you ever seen a ThinkPad? If so, you know how Lenovo (nee IBM) defines style: black, drab, and utilitarian. But if the ThinkPad line is the corporate drone of mobile computing, the IdeaPad line is the entrepreneurial artiste, and the IdeaPad U110—the smallest and most stylish IdeaPad to date—is the quick-witted fashionista. You need only glance at the U110’s closed lid for a first impression of the design theme here: delicate, spiraling, floral, shimmering, yet subtle "tendrils" (Lenovo’s word, not mine). Before we go any further, I’ll simply express my belief that the U110’s crimson runic patterns will more likely appeal to women than men. That’s not based on a survey, but the odds are in my favor. Red is not among my favorite colors—the unit also comes in black and navy blue—but I adore this computer’s style cues; you may not.

The pattern on the lightly textured (etched) lid, with the darker solid-stripe lip and silver reflective Lenovo branding, repeats itself twice more on this computer. Before opening it, flip it over and notice a gray-on-black version of the tendrils, nearly invisible on the lower left corner of the underside.

Also on the flip side are other exotic-looking patterns carved into the plastic in a scattered fashion—these are somewhat functional, revealing vents that allow heat to escape. The final iteration of the tendrils can be found on the inside, at the top of the keyboard where the chassis meets the screen hinge. We’ll get to this more later on, but a finger swipe across a patch of seemingly empty black plastic reveals red-lit subcutaneous LEDs in the shape of curlicue tendrils that can serve as multimedia buttons.

The last style-oriented feature of the U110 is the abundant use of the currently trendy shiny piano black lacquer on the inside—the flat screen-bezel, the keyboard, wristpad, trackpad and buttons are all coated in the slimy stuff. It feels great to the touch, but if you don’t apply the included chamois every ten minutes during use, the chassis starts to look dull and icky. The sides, battery and bottom of the computer are rubberized instead of lacquered, which makes the machine easy to grip.

Even though it is, overall, the smallest machine in this roundup in terms of size (not thickness or weight), the U110 is hearty. The lid is very solid, and as noted earlier, the bottom is ruggedized with rubber (though the little feet on the bottom can sometimes seem a bit slippery on a flat surface). The lid is actually bent at about a 130 degree angle at the last inch closest to the hinge. This bent portion of the metal offsets the screen from the hinge, and strengthens the hinge, which seems to improve viewing angles. Like the Asus U2E, the lip of the lid has no hinge—it stays shut solely via pressure from the hinge.

Lenovo even includes a leather carrying case for the U110—this machine is just that fancy.

Size and Weight

The larger of the two batteries that come with this computer protrudes only slightly from the rear; its curved shape adds to the compact form factor of the machine. The unit’s dimensions are 10.8” wide by 7.7” deep, and 0.88” thick, which is thinner than the Apple MacBook Air. The smaller battery sticks out even less; here you can see the difference:

The U110 weighs only 2.4 pounds, but doesn’t include a built-in optical drive; a solid, rubberized black and perforated-metal external drive is included. The Toshiba Portege R500, while a good deal wider than the Lenovo, includes an internal optical drive and maintains the same weight and thickness as the U110. The power supply brick is a featherweight at 0.67 lbs.

Will you miss the internal optical drive? I didn’t, but I didn’t take any long distance flights while testing it. DVD entertainment is the only crucial use of an optical drive I can think of; I can’t ding the U110 too much for leaving it out.


Switching FireWire for HDMI/Micro-DVI, the U110 has a very similar port configuration to that of the Asus U2E. On the left hand side, the computer has a power port, VGA port, angled fan, two USB ports, and at the edge, a Wi-Fi on/off switch. Along the front bottom lip, Lenovo has placed nothing but a glowing blue LED icon in the shape of a power button, to indicate the computer’s status.

On the right hand side there is an ExpressCard slot, an SD (and other format) card reader, a headphone and microphone jack, Firewire port, one final USB port, and a gigabit Ethernet port. There’s no modem, and there’s no internal broadband card—use the ExpressCard slot to get either function if necessary. Speaking of wireless communications, the Lenovo meets all the usual standards except Draft-N. It’s the only one in this roundup to lack N compliance, but perhaps is has been left out because very few consumer router and products actually feature N, and this is a very consumer-friendly machine.

Style score: 5



In terms of specifications, the U110’s 11.1” screen is identical to the Asus U2E’s—it’s an LED backlit glossy number. But something about the Lenovo’s is just glossier. When I stare into the screen for a while, it seems to be a bit distorted by an extra layer of glass, and the content of the screen looks shimmery and textured; there’s also some glare and distortion. Color vibrancy is spot on, however. The entire display piece—the underside of the lid—is completely smooth, as though made from one piece of plastic, with the exception of the small notch in the top center for the tiny webcam.


Each key on the smudgy piano black keyboard of the U110 is big—bigger than any key on almost any other ultraportable—but size alone does not a comfortable keyboard make. Each key depresses smoothly and evenly, too, but that also is not enough. For a keyboard to be efficient, it needs to maintain a typist’s speed and keep the error rate low. This keyboard decreased my speed and increased my error rate because of the lack of space between the keys, which are practically flush against each other. They are also completely flat, which means there is no texture or shape, other than a slight concavity, to teach my fingers where each key is. More often than not, I hit a neighboring key by accident because each key is so flat and slick. I didn’t live with this computer for months, and if I did I would surely adapt to its quirks, but why should a keyboard force a user to deal with a steep learning curve?


The U110’s trackpad is perfectly smooth and matte—it doesn’t have quite the same lacquering as the rest of the chassis, but it does have a little. It is very responsible and slick, and the seam between the trackpad and wristpad is obvious without feeling jarring when you reach it with your finger. The mouse buttons are similar, but received the full piano black paint job. They’re even, only slightly raised from the trackpad, and not too springy when clicked. Some people might prefer a bit more response from the buttons, though.

Hardware Controls

The "magical" swiping action that activates scrolling the soft keys above the keyboard is one the most whimsical and cutting-edge features of this computer. It might seem inefficient to have buttons that aren’t always visible, but how many people even set up the physical multimedia buttons that grace a typical laptop? One of the buttons launches an audio manager, and two of the other buttons can be tied to a macro that activates just about any other application. There’s also a visible volume control light (up, down and mute). On the left side there is a power button and a "Novo" button. This latter button performs many tasks: generally, clicking it activates power settings to conserve battery life. But if something’s amiss with the machine, clicking it when the computer’s off can activate a system restore the next time the machine is powered on (let’s hope you never have to use it!) Behind these keys are the small "Dolby Home Theater" speakers, one on each side. Perhaps they produce better than average external sound, but it’s still nothing to write home about.

Heat and Noise

I never felt this machine get warmer than room temperature, nor make any noise at all. That’s surprising given the U110 has a weak hard drive (only running at 4,200 RPM), though the processor never seemed to struggle with any typical tasks, except perhaps upon startup, which took an above average of 90 seconds. I also lost a bit of time every time the facial-recognition software popped up when starting; it works, but steals at least 15 seconds every time you open up the machine. Remember, this is a consumer machine, and it does media well—better than most of its suit-and-tie ultraportable competitors. Check out the Performance section below for more details.

Usability score: 3

Create a new thread in the US Reviews comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
Comment from the forums
    Your comment
  • Anonymous
    Thanks for writing this article; I have been interested in how these things perform.
  • Anonymous
    these are all at the high-end of the price spectrum, have you considered the asus eee pc or acer aspire one? i have one of these, and while it's not exactly a gaming powerhouse it does all you need in a small laptop... mind you the linux distros these things come with can be a real pain
  • JJeng1
    A possible reason for the fingerprint reader placement. Look into the options of the fingerprint software, as sometimes the reader doubles as a scroll wheel.
  • Regulas
    Rubbish, get the the new Macbook, 13" screen plenty of power no viruses and no bloated Vista for the low end of cash stated in this review.
  • bjornlo
    Rubbish, get the the new Macbook, 13" screen plenty of power no viruses and no bloated Vista for the low end of cash stated in this review.

    Typical ignorant fanboi BS.
    Get your facts straight. Nothing wrong with a Mac other than total cost of ownership and slightly reduced software choices... although the default browser is very unsecure (but fixable, DL any other). But, there is nothing special about them except their style and slightly better ease of use for the "technologically challenged".
  • Placebo
    First of, Macs are rubbish. Buying one is alright for the creative crowd, whose fav. software is exclusive for OSX. Other than that, the company would have already closed up, if not saved by the mighty (LOL) Ipod-brand.

    Regarding the otherwise brilliant review, how come the Dell M1330 isn't mentioned, or even tested, its not even on the site?!?!

    Best selling product in the category for almost two years. Anyone buying should look into it. Had one for around a year, can honestly say its the best electronic device i ever owned.

    Its cheap, lightwight and with supurb spec! for notebooks :-)Sry... they jus do a better job.
  • cruiseoveride
    Linux > OSX >> Windows

    I wish the IBM one was cheaper.
  • boostercorp
    i guess i never understood why you'd need such a small underpowered laptop and also never knew who would buy such a thing.
    But if you're on the road alot like me it would be more handy then dragging around a 8 pound 17" laptop like i 'm currently doing.

    i only hoped they'd be a little less expensive cause i bought my 17" for € 899 and got a shedload of stuff i didn't need like that fingerprint scanner ,bluetooth ,ir , ...
  • Anonymous
    Can we post a review of ultraportables with eSATA and Express Card ? I think the ASUS U6V (not sure) has one, the Dell E4200 and E4300 have eSATA but no Express Card. The Lenovo X200 and X300 series have some great features. I really hope manufacturers start making machines with eSATA and Express Card and not one or the other. Oh and How about the Toshiba dynabook R6 ?
  • enforcer22
    "Rubbish, get the the new Macbook, 13" screen plenty of power no viruses and no bloated Vista for the low end of cash stated in this review."

    O your right and look i cant do anything i want to do with it either.. I also cant get it to look like a computer instead of a over priced pos paperweight. Linux is as usless to me as that over priced thing keeping my desk up to.
  • Anonymous
    have you actually read this article. NO! If you read the very first page, you will understand why we need these so called "ultraportables", and can't stand the new fashion of eee pc's, that can barely surf the net.

    We need these things to be small, so they can be with us at all times, but also powerfull enough to run heavy software. For an example, i would need one to be able to run apache server, illustrator cs4, firefox, dreamweaver cs4 and perhaps even photoshop at the same time.

    See some of us make a living from the nets and are not stuck in the office, so we want a computer that can perform in the tasks we need to accomplish, but also easily travel the world with us. One!
  • onesloth
    For the price range of these machines, this article should have included the MacBook Air. It meets all he requirements the author chose, with the exceptions of not having a screen too small to read nor keyboard too small for serious typing.
  • Anonymous
    Is there a reason the P8020 and the Sony TT weren't reviewed here? I know they're new, but it would be more informative to review the latest models, especially considering the advances in Intel's Centrino 2 package.
  • Anonymous
    Mac Book Air beats all these hands down. While you can install Vista on a MacBook Air? Why would you. A notebook with OS X has a way better battery life and it runs faster then Vista. It's also more secure.
  • Anonymous
    Not having the Thinkpad X200 feels like a big slap in the face. It is a 12.1" notebook with an optional LED Backlit 1440x900 screen, something none of these offer. Plus it runs normal, not low-voltage, Core 2 Duo processors for outstanding performance. I just don't understand at all why it was not included.
  • Anonymous
    @Anonymous 11/06/2008 1:47 AM

    take it easy, i was ASKING why not, the article doesn't specify those particular programs - and while yes, they're not 'powerful' they are portable, so i asked about it.
    the atom isn't so bad, i have a core2 laptop (19 inches and about 10 kilos) and while it outstrips the atom one in performance, they can both run the same stuff, it's just one is a bit faster than the other...

    perhaps you should think about going back to the office, all those programs you're running will suck the life out of any battery, get a desktop, a comfy chair and a window.
  • Anonymous
    Windows is an operating system for those who need the absolute best software compatibility they can get. Windows has trouble running at times and it is has security wholes. Windows was designed to be played with and be customized to how you want it (lol staying with in copyright of course) to be for you.

    Mac OSX is a very stable operating system that comes with most all of the software you need and is by far the easiest to use. I still can not get used to the fact everything is done for me though. If you are technically challenged, do not care for Windows, or if you love Apple products then the Apple Macintosh is for you. The big flaw with Apple is there is ABSOLUTELY NO DIY COMPUTER BUILDING. I do not care for the hardware you get stuck with and can not change. Hardware customization is very important for those actively upgrading.

    Finally, there is Linux. Linux is the best running operating system you can get and is also the ultimate OS in customizing (if you have the know how). Linux has so many distributions to choose from such as Fedora Core, Red Hat Enterprise, Ubuntu (the most common from what I have seen), etc. Linux has been the choice operating system for many programmers due to the ease of customizing, low requirements, compatibility with most hardware, and most of the time the OS is free. Lol Linux is probably the only OS you can get for free only due to the fact that it has been in what I would think to be a never-ending "Beta." Linux is not very common due to the lack of it being less-user friendly for the technically challenged, however recent distributions have begun to solve that issue with Windows emulation and user-friendly GUI. Linux does not suffer from spyware and virus attacks due to Windows being the most pre-dominent OS on the market.

    One note on Mac OSX. OSX has a core and kernel with Linux FreeBSD coding at the heart. That's right Mac users you use Linux. This version of FreeBSD is just tweaked with ALOT of eye candy and a very-user-friendly GUI. This makes it very secure for the most part. However, concern has been growing within advanced users as the popularity of Apple computers are increasing. Windows is attacked not only because Microsoft can't build a brick wall to stop a virus, but also because of the fact it is the most used OS. If Mac OSX becomes the dominant OS of the world, expect spyware and viruses to begin infiltrating your hard disks. In the mean time make the switch from using Safari to Firefox. You will save the headache of someone stealing your logins or even worse your financial info. Sorry Apple users but Safari sux just as much as Internet Explorer. Make the switch to Firefox.
  • Anonymous
    is it just me or...
    @Sony Vaio TZ298: Style and Usability page
    it states about using SSD HD yet at "Noise and Heat" section it mentions about "the drives were spinning" as far as i know SSD HD does not spin.
    or it might be the author plugs in supplied external optical drive.
    correct me if i'm wrong.