Nvidia GeForce GTX 465 1 GB Review: Zotac Puts Fermi On A Diet
We've already crowned Nvidia's GeForce GTX 480 the fastest (and most power-hungry) single-GPU card we've ever seen. Now the company is launching its GeForce GTX 465, based on the same massive GF100 GPU. Can such a complex part compete with AMD's value?
Benchmark Results: DiRT 2
Originally one of the titles showcased by AMD to demonstrate DirectX 11 on its Radeon HD 5000-series cards, DiRT 2 actually seems to run better on Nvidia’s high-end GF100-based cards.
Once you get down to the GeForce GTX 465, though, performance is marginally better than the Radeon HD 5830 at 1680x1050 and 1920x1200, while the positions flip at 2560x1600.
Without anti-aliasing, the GeForce GTX 465 actually comes pretty close to the Radeon HD 5850, too. But this illustrates the problem we originally had with the Radeon HD 5830—mainly, it serves up similar performance to the old Radeon HD 4890, but is more expensive. If you have an older 4000-series board, the 5830 simply isn’t an inspiring part. Nvidia takes that problem and expounds it with a card that’s almost priced like a Radeon HD 5850, but doesn’t give us corresponding performance on a consistent basis. DiRT 2 sans AA is an exception to that generalization.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Benchmark Results: DiRT 2
Prev Page Benchmark Results: Aliens Versus Predator Next Page Benchmark Results: Battlefield 2: Bad Company-
Annisman Dang, it looks like Nvidia has almost no real answers for the AMD/ATI lineup of cards. However, if this card can drop in price a little it may be competitive because of some of it's Nvidia-only features. I mean, it runs cooler and uses a fair amount less power than the 470 and 480, maybe this will become the Phsyx card to get ? Espescially if they could manage a single slot version and drop the price. Anyways, no competition is bad for everyone and I hope Nvidia can get their act together asap.Reply -
tacoslave fatkid35i'll stick to my crossfire'd 5770s. same money and same power consumption.Or a 5870 same thing less problems but thats just me. oh and that thing got pwnd by a 5830 and thats not saying much.Reply
-
welshmousepk wow, the pricing of this thing is all wrong. given how well the the 480 and 470 sit in the market, this just seems like a pointless card.Reply -
liquidsnake718 How many times do I have to say that this is nothing but a marketing gimmick for defective GTX480's and possibly 470's as well. Like the 5830 which was a cut/gimped/ or limited 5850Reply -
bombat1994 make it 60 cheaper and you might have a good card but i would buy a 5850 over this thing everyday of the weelReply -
dco retail is messed up they charge you for a brand not the product by comparison. Whats worse is that people will buy it.Reply -
rohitbaran The GTX4xx line is definitely not the way it is to be played and this latest crappy piece of hardware further proved it. Hot and expensive but poor on performance. The more cards they launch, the clearer ATI's victory becomes.Reply