Tom's CPU Architecture Shootout: 16 CPUs, One Core Each, And 3 GHz
The CPU landscape is really complex. Both AMD and Intel offer tons of different models. But how would today’s processors perform if they didn't have multiple cores? We take 16 different CPUs and compare them all using a single core running at 3 GHz.
Benchmark Results: 3DMark 11
3DMark 11 requires DirectX 11-compliant hardware.
If you just look at 3DMark's graphics test, it is pretty obvious that most of the Intel processor cores deliver very similar results, whereas the AMD CPUs without L3 cache suffer from noticeable performance drops.
The overall score seems to reflect the potential of each core's caching architecture. Sandy Bridge is the most sophisticated, and the latest Phenom II processors do relatively well, too. The AMD processors without L3 cache aren’t any faster than the old Intel Pentium 4 in this metric.
The combined test taxes both the processor and graphics card by incorporating tessellation and physics. The results show clearly that a modern quad-core processor (or more) makes sense in situations where the software is properly optimized for threading. Once again, this is a synthetic measurement, which means it may represent a best- or worst-case scenario; real-world outcomes are probably going to be very different.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Benchmark Results: 3DMark 11
Prev Page Test Setup And Benchmarks Next Page Benchmark Results: Sandra 2010 Pro