Workstation Shootout: Nvidia Quadro 5000 Vs. ATI FirePro V8800
Nvidia sure didn't waste any time introducing its Fermi architecture to the workstation space. Its Quadro 5000 is one of the first models to use the company's GF100 graphics processor. How does this card stack up against ATI’s flagship FirePro V8800?
Comparisons And Applications
| Model | GPU | Fab | Mainstream Equivalent | Memory | DVI | DisplayPort | 3-Pin Stereo | Max Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATi FirePro V8800 | RV870 Cypress | 40 nm | Radeon HD 5870 | 2048 MB GDDR5 (256-bit) | 2 (Adapter) | 4 | Yes | 208 W |
| ATi FirePro V8700 | RV770 | 55 nm | Radeon HD 4870 | 1024 MB GDDR5 (256-bit) | 1 | 2 | Yes | 151 W |
| Nvidia Quadro 5000 | GF100 Fermi | 40 nm | GeForce GTX 465 | 2560 MB GDDR5 (320-bit) | 1 | 2 | Yes | 152 W |
| Nvidia Quadro FX 4800 | GT200 | 65 nm | GeForce GTX 260 | 1536 MB GDDR3 (384-bit) | 1 | 2 | Yes | 150 W |
| Model | Memory Bandwidth | DirectX | OpenGL | Shader Model | Core Clock | Memory Clock | Pixel & Vertex Processing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATi FirePro V8800 | 147.2 GB/s | 11.0 | 4.1 | 5.0 | 825 MHz | 1150 MHz | 1600 SPUs |
| ATi FirePro V8700 | 115.2 GB/s | 10.1 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 750 MHz | 900 MHz | 800 SPUs |
| Nvidia Quadro 5000 | 120 GB/s | 11.0 | 4.1 | 5.0 | 513 MHz | 1500 MHz | 352 SPUs |
| Nvidia Quadro FX 4800 | 76.8 GB/s | 10.0 | 3.1 | 4.0 | 600 MHz | 800 MHz | 192 SPUs |
New Applications
Workstation graphics cards of this caliber are usually employed by engineers. Companies like Autodesk, Dassault and Mental Images offer specialized software solutions. Less-powerful models are a good fit for less-demanding applications in fields like digital content creation and desktop publishing.
As a result of the increasing popularity of 3D movies, demand for workstation cards has increased dramatically in Hollywood and its production studios. In the case of films aimed at a theatrical release (as opposed to straight-to-DVD production) the producers often use a resolution that is four times that of full HD. These companies need a quick way to check how their 3D models will appear to the audience. Since time is money, they obviously want to see the results as quickly as possible, and can’t afford long rendering times every time one of the parameters of a model is altered. One such production company is The Foundry, which also produced several scenes for last year’s blockbuster Avatar.
Workstation cards are also very beneficial for video enhancement. For example, MotionDSP offers a software solution that acts as a retroactive image stabilizer for shaky home videos. One solution used by the police and the military is called Ikena. There is even a freeware variant available to home users called vReveal that also offers image stabilization, but has some other tricks up its sleeve as well.
Current developments in the medical sector are interesting as well. Here, powerful workstation solutions like Nvidia's Quadro are used in real-time 4D imaging. Until recently, imaging systems, such as ultrasound and CAT scans, only provided moving images in 2D. 3D images, on the other hand, were always snapshots. That is different today. Medical equipment able to show the beating heart and the flow of blood through its chambers usually rely on workstation-class graphics cards like the ones we are looking at in this review.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Comparisons And Applications
Prev Page Introduction Next Page Nvidia Quadro 5000: Overview
-
tacoslave if amd put a little more work on their drivers (i.e crossfire and firepro performance)they would be the clear performance champion.Reply -
Gin Fushicho I really wish I knew what these numbers meant.Reply
For someone who doesn't do 3-D design these benchmarks are kinda confusing. -
joytech22 You need to remember, Fermi is designed not "Just" for games, but was also designed, from day one, with computing in mind as well.Reply -
SchizoFrog Once again the arguement regarding AMD Drivers is brought to the fore. But more than this, when AMD has a line of products that could be said to 'miss' they absolutely FAIL. nVidia on the otherhand seem to have learned their lesson well from the 5xxxFX series and can still produce products that can compete at least at some level, ie: GTX460. Although these are Workstation products, nVidia have a complete package with GPUs and Drivers that work from the off.Reply -
davefb sort of interesting, but why is there no comparison to mainstream boards? There is a massive premium of cost here but nothing to be able to say 'hey boss, the onboard graphics we use really don't cut it any more, how about a quadro'.Reply
(or have I sped-read past the reason why ;) )