Rosewill Photon-1200 PSU Review

Reviews
By
Published

Today, we evaluate Rosewill's Photon-1200, manufactured by Sirfa, featuring fully modular cabling, Gold-rated efficiency and a high watt-per-dollar ratio.

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Load Regulation, Hold-Up Time And Inrush Current

To learn more about our PSU tests and methodology, please check out How We Test Power Supply Units. 

Primary Rails And 5VSB Load Regulation

Load Regulation testing is detailed here.

Hold-Up Time

Our hold-up time tests are described in detail here.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware

The Photon-1200's hold-up time easily surpasses the minimum allowed by the ATX spec.

Inrush Current

For details on our inrush current testing, please click here.

The inrush current that our shiny, new power meter (N4L PPA1530) measured is very high, especially with 115V. Sirfa should make the necessary changes to fix this.

Load Regulation And Efficiency Measurements

The first set of tests reveals the stability of the voltage rails and the PSU's efficiency. The applied load equals (approximately) 10 to 110 percent of the supply's maximum in increments of 10 percentage points.

We conducted two additional tests. During the first, we stressed the two minor rails (5V and 3.3V) with a high load, while the load at +12V was only 0.10A. This test reveals whether a PSU is Haswell-ready or not. In the second test, we determined the maximum load the +12V rail could handle with minimal load on the minor rails.  

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Test 12V(A/V) 5V(A/V) 3.3V(A/V) 5VSB(A/V) PowerDC/AC(W) Efficiency(%) Fan Speed(RPM) Fan NoisedB(A) TempIn/Out(°C) PF/AC (V)
1 7.986A 1.932A 1.959A 0.971A 119.75 85.62 1630 55.7 40.07 0.899
12.296V 5.164V 3.367V 5.134V 139.86 42.20 115.1V
2 17.008A 2.907A 2.944A 1.170A 239.67 89.59 1690 55.6 41.35 0.928
12.276V 5.157V 3.360V 5.121V 267.51 43.76 115.1V
3 26.421A 3.393A 3.455A 1.369A 359.84 90.53 1730 55.1 41.64 0.948
12.255V 5.149V 3.354V 5.108V 397.48 44.31 115.1V
4 35.837A 3.882A 3.939A 1.568A 479.61 90.58 1780 54.3 43.16 0.961
12.235V 5.143V 3.348V 5.095V 529.51 46.36 115.1V
5 44.954A 4.867A 4.936A 1.768A 599.53 90.21 1820 54.5 44.02 0.969
12.214V 5.134V 3.341V 5.083V 664.60 47.58 115.1V
6 54.107A 5.848A 5.932A 1.970A 719.43 89.62 1830 54.6 44.61 0.974
12.192V 5.126V 3.336V 5.072V 802.76 48.68 115.1V
7 63.271A 6.834A 6.932A 2.170A 839.12 88.85 1830 54.6 45.46 0.978
12.171V 5.118V 3.331V 5.059V 944.40 50.17 115.1V
8 72.509A 7.831A 7.940A 2.374A 959.21 87.94 1830 54.6 46.86 0.981
12.148V 5.108V 3.324V 5.045V 1090.75 51.97 115.1V
9 82.183A 8.333A 8.470A 2.379A 1079.08 87.02 1830 54.6 48.28 0.982
12.125V 5.102V 3.318V 5.040V 1240.07 53.69 115.1V
10 91.239A 8.833A 8.970A 4.020A 1198.94 85.71 1830 54.6 49.16 0.984
12.103V 5.093V 3.311V 4.972V 1398.88 54.85 115.1V
11 101.338A 8.844A 8.986A 4.025A 1318.95 85.06 1830 54.6 49.34 0.984
12.081V 5.087V 3.305V 4.968V 1550.57 55.48 115.1V
CL1 0.099A 16.020A 16.000A 0.001A 137.13 80.93 1830 54.6 46.03 0.907
12.299V 5.136V 3.352V 5.177V 169.44 50.39 115.1V
CL2 99.944A 1.002A 1.003A 1.002A 1222.26 86.04 1830 54.6 50.67 0.983
12.094V 5.110V 3.319V 5.081V 1420.63 57.23 115.1V

Load regulation isn't bad, but it's not top-notch, either. Let's call it somewhere between good and bad. Compared with the more expensive PSUs in this category, the Photon-1200 doesn't score well. The supply does deliver its full power for prolonged periods, even at operating temperatures close to 50 °C (122 °F).  However, this result wasn't achieved without problems, as you will see from the ripple results we measured. So, if you're building a power-hungry system with this PSU, keep its operating temperature below 40 °C (104 °F).

The situation gets worse when we start looking at noise output. Even at light loads, high ambient temperatures cause the fan to get really loud. Also, as you can see from the table above, it has significant bearing noise at around 1600 RPM where its acoustic output peaks. The inefficient platform doesn't leave room for a more relaxed fan profile.

TOPICS
Aris Mpitziopoulos
Aris Mpitziopoulos
Contributing Editor

Aris Mpitziopoulos is a contributing editor at Tom's Hardware, covering PSUs.

7 Comments Comment from the forums
  • MasterMace
    Sirfa has produced too many poor units in the past to get any leeway or benefit of the doubt. It failed 80 Plus Gold in the hotbox at 100% load.
    Reply
  • boller
    I have a good perspective on that ripple thing: just finished repairs of a PC power supply and when I was measuring ripple I found it was out of whack (300 mV pp). After some investigation I found out that measuring ripple is a tricky thing. Tom's description on how they do it is very incomplete. Eevblog guy spent an entire episode on ripple. In my case I had to do this: limit oscilloscope bandwidth 20 MHz, instead of the grounding clip use that spring attachment and measure loaded PSU at the last cap before leads. Ripple went down from 300 to 48 mV pp.
    Reply
  • Aris_Mp
    First of all you don't just hook a scope on a PSU's output and measure ripple else you will catch huge spikes, like in your case, which will totally alter the measured result.

    Secondly most users aren't interested on how I do things (and even if I elaborated on all the procedures I follow only a fraction of them would understand them) but about the final result. For me the most important is to explain what ripple is and how it can affect the components of a system.

    Thirdly. You don't have to watch Dave to see how ripple is measured properly. You can check on the ATX spec which includes the ripple measurement procedure. I follow all guidelines of the ATX spec so if you need to see how I measure ripple or load regulation just take a look at them. In any case the following scheme will show you how to measure ripple on a PSU.

    Reply
  • boller
    No need to be defensive, I was just pointing out that your _description_ is incomplete, not that you do it wrong. Although it would be nice for you to place a note over there saying that actual procedure involves some additional caps and an honest to god differential probe (!)
    Reply
  • Aris_Mp
    I just replied to your concerns. No need to think that I am defensive because clearly this is not the case with me.

    I already stated that I don't mention how I measure ripple since among others all of us reviewers have to follow the ATX spec procedure. There is no point in repeating the whole ATX spec from the moment that anyone can download and read this spec with a simple google search.

    Besides these two caps (which are already pre-installed on the fixtures that most of us reviewers have. There also present on loaders like the Sunmoon ones) and the good quality probes you also need to isolate all external noise that can pass from the PSU's EMI filter. In other words you need to provide "clean" power to the PSU. Personally I do this with a Chroma AC source and in the near future I plan to get a online UPS with some extra circuits for EMI/noise protection which will feed the AC source (so I will have two layers of protection). In order to check if your line is clean firstly take some readings on the major rails (+12V, 5V and 3.3V) with the PSU in standby. If you see increased ripple (normally it should be close to zero mV) then your scope picks up noise or the PSU isn't properly isolated from the rest devices on your home/lab.
    Reply
  • CTurbo
    It's not a bad unit, but it's not competitive at all. It's more expensive than an EVGA G2 1300w Gold and and Rosewill Capstone 1200w Gold, and almost as much as an EVGA P2 1200w. Yikes!
    Reply
  • Mac266
    Shame it performed badly, a cheap high rated supply could stir the market up nicely!

    It's not a bad unit, but it's not competitive at all. It's more expensive than an EVGA G2 1300w Gold and and Rosewill Capstone 1200w Gold, and almost as much as an EVGA P2 1200w. Yikes!

    CTurbo! How ya been mate?
    Reply