Join for quick access. Enter your email below and we'll send confirmation plus sign you up to our newsletter.
By submitting your information, you confirm you are aged 16 or over,
have read our
Privacy Policy
and agree to the
Terms & Conditions. Geographical rules apply.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Join the club
Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.
An account already exists for this email address, please log in.
The latest news to come out of the memory segment focuses on next-generation memories that slot in-between NAND and DRAM. This is an interesting turn of events, but in all honesty we haven't even begun to completely reap the benefits of NAND-based storage. Competing new types of memory will be expensive in comparison to NAND, but luckily we're just hitting the sweet spot of NAND's developmental cycle as the cost continues to plummet.
To be more accurate, Samsung is hitting the sweet spot. They are, after all, the only manufacturer shipping 3D NAND. When Samsung's first generation 3D NAND emerged many of the competition countered that Samsung likely wasn't turning a profit, and supply would be limited.
Samsung is now onto its second-generation 32-layer V-NAND products, and already has the next, 48-layer generation locked and loaded. Samsung continues to enjoy the benefits of its early entrance into the 3D realm, and questions about profitability aren't really of concern to the end users as long as the product is competitively priced.
The SM863 wields the latest V-NAND and comes with the normal high performance and endurance we have come to expect from 3D NAND products, but it also offers a very competitive price point. This doesn't bode well for the competition.
We would appreciate reviews of smaller sizes such as SM863 (and PM863) 240 & 480 Gb how they run vs 960 and bigger models, please. A further plus would be how customer-oriented models (e.g. 850 / 850 Pro) running enterprise tests compare vs these enterprise line.
