Drive Performance Per Watt
Streaming Reads Performance per Watt
Again, the fast mode clearly required a bit less power in dealing with sequential workloads.
Since performance does not change for streaming reads…
… the performance per watt ratio resulted in a better result for the drive using fast mode, since it required a bit less power using this setting. However, the difference is small.
Workstation I/O Performance per Watt
Here is more proof of slower head movement when the drive is set to quiet mode. In our workstation I/O test, the Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.B delivered fewer I/O operations per second compared to fast mode.
This result was as expected and perfectly clear: the Hitachi drive set to fast mode requires more power for I/O intensive tasks than when it is set to quiet mode. The difference was 1.1 W on our test system.
As a result of the power savings compared with a relatively small performance difference, the quiet mode comes out on top, and actually provides a better performance per watt ratio on workstation I/O workloads than the drive’s fast mode!
Current page: Drive Performance Per WattPrev Page Application Benchmarks, Noise, Temperature, Idle Power Next Page Conclusion
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.