Billionaire investor regrets dumping Nvidia shares that are now worth $1.19 billion — pulled the trigger before 10-to-1 split, missing out on hundreds of millions of dollars

Nvidia
(Image credit: Nvidia)

In mid-June, Nvidia was the world's most valuable company, with a market capitalization of $3.34 trillion. Today, it is the No. 2 company in the world by market capitalization, with a market cap of $3.329 trillion. However, some investors sold Nvidia stock just before the 10-to-1 split in May because they thought it was too expensive. One of them is Stanley Druckenmiller, who now deeply regrets his actions, he told Bloomberg.

Stanley Druckenmiller, who used to be the head of Duquesne Capital and is now a top-down investor running Duquesne Family Office LLC, regrets the decision he now considers a mistake. Initially, he planned to hold his Nvidia stock for years but sold it when it was priced between $800 and $950, missing its rise to $1,300. At a conference 18 months earlier, he was confident in maintaining the investment long-term. However, when Nvidia's value tripled in just a year, he felt the valuation was too high and decided to sell as he was not the kind of investor to hold through such rapid gains. 

According to CNBC, in the third quarter of 2023, Nvidia was Duquesne's largest position, with 8.75 million shares valued at about $400 million. Then he started selling. At the start of the year, Duquesne held 6.18 million Nvidia shares, which dropped to 1.76 million by Q1's end and 214,000 by Q2's close. Had the fund kept that stake, it would now be worth roughly $1.19 billion. The firm has not yet shared its Q3 holdings this year, so we do not know how much it lost in missed opportunities. Still, with a net worth of $9.98 billion, Druckenmiller is rich anyway.

Despite regretting missing opportunities, the investor remains optimistic about Nvidia's future, especially its role in AI infrastructure. The most exciting part is that while the company's stock is still attractive, he is waiting for its price to drop before repurchasing it. However, as the stock remains expensive, Druckenmiller can only 'lick their wounds' from the missed opportunity, according to himself.

While Stanley Druckenmiller admits that he is a big believer in AI and sees enormous opportunities for Nvidia in this market segment, he still believes that the green company's stock could plunge, which is when it is time for him to buy. 

The question is, if Nvidia's stock price drops from $136 per share to, say, $80–$95 per share, it would mean that over a trillion dollars will be erased from the company's market capitalization, and that would be a shock for the whole market. Such changes are unlikely to happen overnight, so Nvidia or the AI sector would need to underperform for a while before that could happen. That in turn raises doubts as to whether Stanley Druckenmiller or other investors would be interested in reinvesting in stocks and market segments that have underperformed.

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • jg.millirem
    I’m always sad when a billionaire misses out on more billions.
    Reply
  • JamesJones44
    Hard to complain about taking a profit. Sure, could have, would have, should have. However, had the stock gotten chopped in half and him taken a lose it would have been a lot worse if he didn't take the profit.
    Reply
  • Notton
    More evidence that rich people don't get rich from working hard or having a keen financial sense.
    They're just lucky.
    Reply
  • toffty
    I'm filthy rich but I could have had more money! Cry for me!

    He should just jump off a cliff and make that money available to everyone else
    Reply
  • DavidLejdar
    Yeah? Well, I have some Intel stock, since before it went down, by like a lot. :D

    Shows though, that even the big guys don't always get it right.

    For me, intensive trading is simply too time-intensive. When I started with stock trading last February, I did spend some time on learning stuff, and did some day-trading, over-night trading, and stuff, on free days (working full-time, but shifts also on weekends).

    Within a few weeks I was up +10% on the total amount I went in with, without any derivatives - which isn't as good as at least 1% per trading day (which I figure may be around the minimum to do that stuff professionally, like for a company with money of other people), but it outdid likely performance of just passive investment, also thanks to well performing market.

    It involved a lot of time though, watching for possible opportunities, and then that moment to sell. And with just a few thousands in, didn't really seem as lucrative, as an 2nd job would. Some of the stuff is possible to have notifications for, or buy/sell orders. But still needs a plan, even if the shortlist of companies is short. So, these months, just having some of the income go into ETF savings plans. Currently best performing is for me a Taiwan ETF, at +15%.

    Won't buy me a home. But I'll be glad to have a small financial cushion. In example, $200 invested per month, that's $2,400 a year, and $24,000 in 10 years. IF the investments grow by 5% per year, then that is likely to outdo inflation, and adds some on top. And that amount will help to be able to afford stuff for the household and perhaps a new GPU or so. Such as when then at some point in retirement, where the monthly income will likely be barely enough to get by on - especially if politicians listen even more to guys like Mr Druckenmiller, who apparently argues for reduced social spending - something which can be quite hardcore for many people, especially if there is no regulation about rents, and not enough jobs to go around, when all them companies reduce staff as much as they can, to squeeze out another million in managerial bonus, for such "cost reduction", with no regard to next year, when all that qualified staff may be needed even more, etc. etc. Broader topics though, of course.
    Reply