AMD CEO Lisa Su reportedly hits $1 billion net worth on back of AI boom
Well, behind Nvidia's CEO, though.
With AMD's stock price crossing the $170 mark, the company's CEO, Lisa Su, has now seen her net worth increase to over $1 billion, according to Forbes. She is now the 26th woman in the U.S. to become a self-made billionaire, largely thanks to her copious holdings of AMD stock. Though AI has made Su pretty rich, she still has quite a ways to go before reaching the net worth of arch-rival CEO Jensen Huang of Nvidia.
Su's estimated net worth is $1.1 billion, and about three-fourths of that is made up of shares in AMD that total roughly four million with a total value of approximately $700 million. AMD's stock price has been on a record-breaking streak since January, first hitting a new 52-week high, then beating the previous record of $164.46 in November 2021, and finally peaking at $184.92 to then settle in at just above $170 in the past couple of weeks. Since Su has sold about $400 million of AMD stock since 2016, her net worth is (at minimum) $1.1 billion.
That over a billion dollars worth of AMD stock has passed through Su's hands is notable, especially now that it is so valuable. As AMD's CEO, Su is paid in hard cash and stock, which isn't unusual except for the part where Su's billion-dollar fortune is almost entirely propped up by AMD stock. She owns and has owned millions upon millions of shares.
However, Su's circumstances are unique; she became AMD's CEO in 2014 when the company was rumored to be nearly bankrupt. She was paid a lower salary than outgoing CEO Rory Read, and to make up for it, she was paid in stock, which hovered around $2 to $4 before 2016. Su was paid so much in stock in her first year as CEO that AMD paid her too much according to stock awarding rules, resulting in an award of 1.76 million shares being canceled.
Since her pay was and still is primarily tied to the performance of AMD's stock, Su has been strongly incentivized to make the stock price go up. She turned the company around essentially thanks to the Zen CPU architecture, which has resulted in record CPU revenue and market share for AMD. AMD's market capitalization surpassed Intel's for the first time after the acquisition of Xilinx, which provides the technology crucial for AMD's AI ambitions.
Of course, Su is probably worth considerably more than just $1.1 billion; it's hard to imagine that her $400 million from selling AMD stock is just sitting around. The CEO likely has other investments and assets that buoy her net worth, and she has been on the board of companies like Cisco during her time at AMD. It's unclear when Su became a billionaire, but she certainly is one at this point, at least because of her AMD holdings.
Though being a billionaire is pretty great, being a multi-billionaire is even better, which is the situation in which Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang finds himself. He was worth a little over $40 billion in November of last year, and that has since ramped to over $60 billion today. Like Su, Huang also owns lots of shares of the company he's in charge of. Huang's much higher net worth is likely due to his tenure at Nvidia stretching back to its founding, the company's much more prosperous position in 2014, and the stock price's meteoric rise, especially since 2023.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Matthew Connatser is a freelancing writer for Tom's Hardware US. He writes articles about CPUs, GPUs, SSDs, and computers in general.
-
thisisaname Think how much she has lost selling the shares when they where cheaper 🤯Reply
The share price ended the year at $11.34, if she had sold them at their high this year that would have been more like $6.5Billion. Most likely it would have been even more as the share price went up 309.4% for the year, at best $23Billion!! -
Neilbob Which ever way you swing it, I don't think she'll be needing to apply for Social Security any time soon.Reply -
TerryLaze
Aren't there conditions and limitations on how many shares an CEO ,and people in the company in general, can sell in how much time?thisisaname said:Think how much she has lost selling the shares when they where cheaper 🤯
The share price ended the year at $11.34, if she had sold them at their high this year that would have been more like $6.5Billion. Most likely it would have been even more as the share price went up 309.4% for the year, at best $23Billion!!
I mean shares are great and all but they only become money if you sell them, until then it's shroedingers net-worth. -
Co BIY TerryLaze said:Aren't there conditions and limitations on how many shares an CEO ,and people in the company in general, can sell in how much time?
I mean shares are great and all but they only become money if you sell them, until then it's shroedingers net-worth.
Insider trading regulations and market constraints do limit what they can do.
Important insiders like CEOs usually sell shares in boring well planned tranches over time. Their stock options usually have maturity dates as well. If they try and make "well-timed" market trades or large moves they are open to "insider trading" accusations and can create confidence problem for the company.
Despite these limits they seem to do OK. -
thisisaname
Most likely but I was just playing a game of whatifshedidnotselling :ROFLMAO:TerryLaze said:Aren't there conditions and limitations on how many shares an CEO ,and people in the company in general, can sell in how much time?
I mean shares are great and all but they only become money if you sell them, until then it's shroedingers net-worth. -
ezst036 I am happy for Lisa Su. There are a lot of jealous haters on these forums who because they aren't wealthy, they want to destroy anybody who is, but we should celebrate when people are successful and especially given how Su has turned AMD around and into a powerhouse.Reply
Let us all not forget that it wasn't all that long ago that we had re-badged Radeons and the CPU line was based on Steamroller derivatives.
RDNA2/3 didn't turn out as had hoped but they are way more competitive than previous generations, and Ryzen is the star of the show.
The AI boom is only icing on the cake. Su already did great things before that. -
TerryLaze
Calling them a power house is very far fetched, when they barely keep the lights on.ezst036 said:I am happy for Lisa Su. There are a lot of jealous haters on these forums who because they aren't wealthy, they want to destroy anybody who is, but we should celebrate when people are successful and especially given how Su has turned AMD around and into a powerhouse.
Let us all not forget that it wasn't all that long ago that we had re-badged Radeons and the CPU line was based on Steamroller derivatives.
RDNA2/3 didn't turn out as had hoped but they are way more competitive than previous generations, and Ryzen is the star of the show.
The AI boom is only icing on the cake. Su already did great things before that.
Last quarter they turned 6% of their revenue into actual money, and that is up from 4% the previous quarter and up from -3% yoy quarter.
For the whole of 2023 they made 2% of money vs 5% for all of 2022. (operating margin)
https://www.amd.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2024-1-30-amd-reports-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-2023-fina.html -
Tom Sunday
She absolutely deserves the 'threshold money' and all of the other parts offered in tandem with her overall package. But for me and now it’s back to looking for the next pay check or overtime which cannot come early enough! Yes...reality bites for some of us.thisisaname said:Most likely it would have been even more as the share price went up 309.4% for the year, at best $23Billion!! -
DavidLejdar Yeah, a number of stock has increased quite some recently. Nvidia (NVDA) was the top rider for 2023 (in percentage), but other stock performed quite some as well.Reply
Talk about AI apparently put some companies more into focus of (older) stock investors. And there seems to be some industrial-scale business going on - as in, not just selling individual GPUs and similar to us guys in the street, and a server here and there, but now also perhaps even huge AI brains.
Personally, I am not sure how much revenue AI will bring these companies long-term. It's not like e.g. artists would be paid that much to begin with, that it could mean a huge revenue stream for the clients of these companies, if they would rely on AI drawing pictures. On the other hand, there arguably is quite some potential in AI to help with weather models, medical research and diagnosis, etc.
Either way, I am now entering the stock market as well. Tomorrow I will be worth like $100. :) Not gonna rely on the market discovering, that AMD has a more spread product portfolio than Nvidia does, and even outdid Nvidia in revenue some years in the past. But I am going to setup an ETF savings plan, with an ETF with relatively high allocation of AMD, hoping that it will outdo inflation. Mostly to save up a bit for in 20 years or so - we don't have 401(k) as such here in Germany. Pension saving plans here are like: "You give us $100 a month for 25 years, and then we are going to give you at least $1,000, or perhaps even up to $2,000 every year, once you retire.". That isn't the worst. But when investing $5,000 over five years, and possibly having it double every 10 years, that's $20,000 in 25 years - and then a yearly return of 5% would already be the $1,000, at way less invested.
Of course there is risk. Such as when all young folks in the world rush to fight over some hills, to please some older guys, who just want to feel something, then that's not necessarily going to be great for stock in particular. But in terms of actually moving on, there is a need for technological and IT solutions.
Well, e.g. in 2022, AMD had nearly as much revenue as Nvidia. Not only from GPUs - but when i.e. Nvidia already had been considered someone (based on company performance), then AMD surely is as well.TerryLaze said:Calling them a power house is very far fetched, when they barely keep the lights on.
Last quarter they turned 6% of their revenue into actual money, and that is up from 4% the previous quarter and up from -3% yoy quarter.
For the whole of 2023 they made 2% of money vs 5% for all of 2022. (operating margin)
https://www.amd.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2024-1-30-amd-reports-fourth-quarter-and-full-year-2023-fina.html
And by the way, AMD's gross margin was 46% for the year. One could of course argue, that they should turn that into as much operating margin as possible. But them having put e.g. nearly $6bn into R&D in one year, that's quite some R&D.