Power utility built $95 million 500-megawatt power substation for Intel's $100 billion Ohio fab, but six-year delay leaves substation capable of powering 500,000 homes idle

Intel
(Image credit: Intel)

Financial troubles have forced Intel to delay building and equipping its site in Ohio on multiple occasions, and now that the timeline has slipped to 2031, it is beginning to impact Intel's partners. NBC4i reports that the company now expects to start making chips at its Ohio fab in 2031, which leaves American Electric Power (AEP) Ohio with an idle power substation that cannot start operations without Intel.

Intel's decision to delay the launch of its Ohio semiconductor facility, once called Silicon Heartland, to 2031 has left AEP Ohio with completed but idle power infrastructure that costs $95 million. The utility company built a major substation specifically to meet Intel's expected power needs, but now it must wait years before it can start generating a return on its investment. 

Back in September 2024, the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) approved a financial arrangement between Intel and AEP Ohio. Under that deal, AEP would invest in building a new 500-megawatt substation, which Intel would begin using once the first fab (Mod 1) at its Ohio site comes online. In 2024, Intel expected this to happen in 2027 – 2028, which was already a delay from the originally expected 2025 kick-off. However, in early 2025, Intel shifted the completion of the first fab to 2030, with production to start at the Silicon Heartland Mod 1 in 2030-2031.

The substation, known as Green Chapel Station, was designed to meet Intel's massive power demand and is scheduled to be operational by August 2025. The infrastructure is capable of supporting the electricity needs of up to half a million homes, but it will stand idle until Intel's site becomes operational. Under the 2024 agreement, Intel was set to receive electricity at a reduced rate for 20 years, while other users of the substation would be billed separately. As a consequence, Intel and its supplier need to revise their deal. 

On June 5, 2025, Intel and AEP submitted a request to PUCO to amend their existing agreement, just four days after AEP Ohio announced an increase in customer rates. Despite the overlap in timing, AEP stated that the new rates had nothing to do with the Intel-related deal, emphasizing that the changes were caused by power supply and demand dynamics across its 13-state energy grid.

Once the fabrication plant is active, Intel's electricity costs will be partially offset through small charges on residential bills under a program called the Distribution Investment Rider. This mechanism already appears on customer bills for other infrastructure projects, typically adding $2 to $3 per month. AEP explained that none of the Intel-related costs will appear on bills until the facility actually begins drawing power.

AEP Ohio noted that the construction of Green Chapel Station was aligned with Intel's original project schedule, which aimed to start making chips in Ohio between 2027 and 2028. Despite being ready on time, the equipment cannot be placed into service without Intel, which prevents AEP from recovering its costs.

As part of the revised arrangement, AEP is seeking continued cost coverage to bridge the gap created by Intel's delay. Meanwhile, Intel has agreed to absorb any additional expenses if the project ultimately exceeds the original plan, which will protect AEP from financial loss caused by the Silicon Heartland delay.

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

TOPICS
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • TechieTwo
    The utility company will just continue to raise consumer prices to pay for it all.
    Reply
  • passivecool
    Kudos for the local companies and authorities who managed to get such a large infrastructure project implemented so quickly and on time! I live in a place where it seems this would take a decade to get done. as as Process is easily 50% of the cost, I think the situation is not so bad.

    Intel's track record for said achievements has been ... mixed ... my 30tft estimate is that local authorities carefully considered the SWOT matrix and decided that a few 100 $ per household risk was worth the long-term benefits for the entire community.

    Now, if some madman were to have thrown a red monkey-wrench into the works, causing this delay, this could have justified implications in a year or two. But generally, I would say better to invest in solid infrastructure, even at the dire risk of benefiting someone else more than yourself.
    Reply
  • das_stig
    How on earth is that fair, consumers are paying for Intel's electricity and boosting everybody's profits, no wonder the US top riches people and companies they own or manage are getting richer by screwing over the little guy and Government is helping them!
    Reply
  • ejolson
    I don't know details of the contract that explains why the substation can't go online without Intel; however, more power could also be used by an AI datacenter and many of those are ready except for the power.
    Reply
  • SonoraTechnical
    das_stig said:
    How on earth is that fair, consumers are paying for Intel's electricity and boosting everybody's profits, no wonder the US top riches people and companies they own or manage are getting richer by screwing over the little guy and Government is helping them!
    welcome to capitalism where everyone competes fairly.... well... except for the corporate welfare part..
    Pfff, I remember all of the excitement around big high paying jobs returning to the rustbelt.... Instead, the rustbelt gets an additional burden paid by their already stretched taxes...

    For Non-Americans, the rustbelt is a region of the united states from western NY/western PA, through Ohio, Indiana, Illinois and south-eastern Michigan. Former strong holds of blue-collar industrial activity, now full of brown fields and rusting structures with cities sporting decaying infrastructure (roads, bridges, water supply, sewar, rail etc...)
    Reply