New AMD Ryzen 3000 Firmware May Cut Boot Times Considerably

AGESA 1.0.0.3 ABBA - 1.0.0.4 Boot Time Comparison

AGESA 1.0.0.3 ABBA - 1.0.0.4 Boot Time Comparison (Image credit: HKEPC)
Zhiye Liu
News Editor, RAM Reviewer & SSD Technician

Zhiye Liu is a news editor, memory reviewer, and SSD tester at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.

  • hannibal
    Well, well even more improvements... this is worrying ;)
    Reply
  • Walter Smith
    Sooooo.....where exactly were these firmwares deployed to? Cuz I ain't seeing em at the MSI website for the godlike or the ACE.
    Reply
  • hannibal
    They Are still at beta stage. Official release version in few weeks.
    Reply
  • xerces9
    Huh? My old Intel mainboard needs 10 seconds to BIOS setup. (from power on)
    Reply
  • waltc3
    This article is mistaken as the boot-time improvement cited is for MSI boards--certainly not every x570 mboard...;) My x570 Aorus Master boots in 10 seconds right now and has done so since I installed it on July 9th. Why people do not understand that in every bios version released for every motherboard, there is of course the AMD AGESA it's built on, but also the fixes and improvements each motherboard vendor makes to their specific motherboard designs--all of them are different! Which is why you cannot use an Asus bios version for a like-featured Gigabyte or MSI motherboard, and etc. This stuff is basic, Computers 101.
    Reply
  • NightHawkRMX
    Lol can they release a patch for my b350 board. It takes like 15-20 sec to post.

    Oh wait, it has been almost 4 months since ryzens launch and yet msi still hasnt released an alpha bios with ryzen 3000 support.Apparently they literally dont care about people with older boards.

    So i dont expect any more bioses.
    Reply
  • mdd1963
    16 seconds normal just to get into BIOS..after the improvement?

    I'd already be surfing the 2nd website by then...!
    Reply
  • alextheblue
    Hmm it would be interesting to see a shootout article with boot-to-BIOS times for various boards.
    Reply
  • Darkbreeze
    Honestly, I don't get it anyway.

    Seriously, is it REALLY that big of a deal that your system can POST in 16 seconds instead of 20? Four seconds of your life, really? How many hours of human resources went into producing that? Geezis, there's got to be some other performance related aspect of the system that would benefit in a far more frequent and noticeable way that they could put their time into, rather than this.

    People sit and stare at nothing, on random sites, or spend hours searching for something actually interesting in a sea of stupidity, but they lose their marbles if the system takes 20 seconds to boot.

    It's just like when I ask WHY did you buy that NVME drive? So I could shave off two seconds from my boot times. Seriously? You spent 100-140 bucks so you could save TWO SECONDS on the rare occasion you have to restart or shut down? Ridiculous.
    Reply
  • CheckDM
    Long POST times (20+ seconds) appear to be a very consistent complaint about X570 motherboard / 3000 series cpu. The usual explanation is "increased memory training time".

    So this is really good news. A fast boot up time makes all the difference between "just a sec. let me check something on the computer real quick" vs. "ahh forget it, lets go. I don't want to wait for that stupid thing to boot".

    Or the more common scenario: Your game hard crashes, and you need to power cycle and get back into the game immediately. Every second matters.
    Reply