Cyberpunk 2077 CPU Scaling, What Processors Work Best?

Cyberpunk Header Image
(Image credit: CD Projekt Red)

Cyberpunk 2077 is the most hotly-anticipated game in recent history, but it has proven to be punishing for even the most well-equipped PCs. We set out to test the new game with a wide range of the best CPUs on the market to determine which processors provide the best performance in a wide range of resolutions, but you can also see how the individual processors stack up in other games in our CPU Benchmarks Hierarchy page. We've tested AMD's Ryzen 9, 7, 5, and 3 processors across several generations, along with Intel's Core i9, i7, i5, and i3 processors as well.

This article focuses entirely on CPU performance: If you're looking for a closer look at how the game performs with a range of different GPUs, be sure to check out our in-depth Cyberpunk 2077 performance analysis. Thus far, our CPU testing has been with the current 1.04 patch, bringing minor performance enhancements over the original game code. However, CD Projekt Red has announced that it plans to release a new 1.05 patch for PCs soon (consoles already have the patch) with some performance enhancements, but the impact of those changes remains to be seen.

Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • cewhidx
    I dont know yet what my average fps is but I can say that the game is running smooth as silk so far with my configuration:
    Ryzen 5 3600
    EVGA RTX 2080 XC Gaming
    Corsair Vengeance DDR4 3200 32 GB
    1440p GSync 144hz Monitor
    Pretty much maxed out settings with version 1.04, All RTX options enabled with DLSS on balanced.
    I'll update after trying 1.05, but so far after 3 hours of playing, Ive not had any bugs / slowdowns or anything.
    Reply
  • willburstyle06
    Admin said:
    We test a wide range of both Intel and AMD processors to determine which processors perform best in a variety of resolutions.

    Cyberpunk 2077 CPU Scaling, What Processors Work Best? : Read more


    Was the 9900K tested at stock 4.7GHz all cores? In general were the CPU’s all tested at stock? I have mine at 5.1GHz and I’m trying to see how it compares to this test
    Reply
  • Evill-Santa
    What really poor selection of CPU's. You will see a high % of gamers have older CPU's as they get swapped a lot less than GPU's, especially intel's with their more expensive upgrade path. As per the Nov 2020 a bit under 75% of gamers have Intel CPU's yet you have chosen only 2 generations of intel CPU's. (though you have done better with AMD) So it's not really a "wide selection" of nearly 75% of gamers is it?

    Looks like you have taken a wide selection of what is easy for you to test, rather than what would be useful for a large volume of your user base. You have provided good feedback for AMD CPUS's (~25% of market) but very shallow feedback on the intel generations.

    I get it, AMD is all the rage and it will probably be my next CPU, but this would be a much more useful article if you catered for what would be the more likely scenario of the gamers CPU.

    Using CPU performance websites is not really a great way for someone to work out where their CPU sits.
    Reply
  • Geef
    At a bare minimum, many enthusiasts enable the XMP profile in the BIOS

    The only enthusiast who doesn't enable it are the <<Removed by moderator>> ones, or the ones who possibly forgot to last time they reset their settings and they smack their head when they realize what they've done.
    Reply
  • Conahl
    Evill-Santa said:
    What really poor selection of CPU's. You will see a high % of gamers have older CPU's as they get swapped a lot less than GPU's, especially intel's with their more expensive upgrade path. As per the Nov 2020 a bit under 75% of gamers have Intel CPU's yet you have chosen only 2 generations of intel CPU's. (though you have done better with AMD) So it's not really a "wide selection" of nearly 75% of gamers is it?

    Looks like you have taken a wide selection of what is easy for you to test, rather than what would be useful for a large volume of your user base. You have provided good feedback for AMD CPUS's (~25% of market) but very shallow feedback on the intel generations.

    I get it, AMD is all the rage and it will probably be my next CPU, but this would be a much more useful article if you catered for what would be the more likely scenario of the gamers CPU.

    Using CPU performance websites is not really a great way for someone to work out where their CPU sits.

    or, what they tested, is what they had on hand to test, ever consider that ? what is on hand/easy to test vs what they have available to test, could be 2 different things.
    Reply
  • milaaaaaaan_63
    9700K is the best overall for a 199$ !!!
    Reply
  • Minh Nguyen
    the 1.05 patch pretty much does the hex fix, so the default will be the "modified" results
    Reply
  • Paul Alcorn
    willburstyle06 said:
    Was the 9900K tested at stock 4.7GHz all cores? In general were the CPU’s all tested at stock? I have mine at 5.1GHz and I’m trying to see how it compares to this test

    yes, the processors are all tested in stock configs. Head to our 9900K review to see what that chip looks like overclocked - you can kinda reverse engineer the numbers there to get a decent sense of how it does in gaming with an OC.
    Reply
  • Paul Alcorn
    Evill-Santa said:
    What really poor selection of CPU's. You will see a high % of gamers have older CPU's as they get swapped a lot less than GPU's, especially intel's with their more expensive upgrade path. As per the Nov 2020 a bit under 75% of gamers have Intel CPU's yet you have chosen only 2 generations of intel CPU's. (though you have done better with AMD) So it's not really a "wide selection" of nearly 75% of gamers is it?

    Looks like you have taken a wide selection of what is easy for you to test, rather than what would be useful for a large volume of your user base. You have provided good feedback for AMD CPUS's (~25% of market) but very shallow feedback on the intel generations.

    I get it, AMD is all the rage and it will probably be my next CPU, but this would be a much more useful article if you catered for what would be the more likely scenario of the gamers CPU.

    Using CPU performance websites is not really a great way for someone to work out where their CPU sits.

    Time is a factor, plus the patch was looming, so I went with what I had. The patch doesn't seem to make any significant changes, so as mentioned in the article, we'll soldier on with 7th and 8th gen Intel next.

    We don't suggest that you visit CPU benchmark sites for relative performance comparisons. We suggest that you go to our CPU benchmark hierarchy, which has testing performed with solid and repeatable test methodologies in a static test environment. :)
    Reply
  • TimmyP777
    Geef said:
    The only enthusiast who doesn't enable it are the <<Removed by moderator>> ones, or the ones who possibly forgot to last time they reset their settings and they smack their head when they realize what they've done.

    XMP has caused a plethora of problems over the last decade. Especially back when it was more an Intel feature being brought to AMD boards.
    Reply