Arctic Freezer i32 Cooler Review

Early Verdict

The Arctic Freezer i32 is a great choice for buyers seeking a powerful-yet-inexpensive cooler with a six-year warranty and silent-mode capability.

Pros

  • +

    Inexpensive

  • +

    Relatively cool for its size

  • +

    Relatively quiet for its fan speed

  • +

    Silent mode capable under low CPU loads

  • +

    Six-year warranty

Cons

  • -

    Second-place finish in price-per-performance

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Everyone has a perspective on value, yet manufacturers and marketing teams don’t always seem to get the word on pricing from the street. Arctic launched its $50 MSRP slim tower cooler to compete against models quoted up to around $75. Because street pricing has put some of those competitors between $50-60, we’re happy to see the Freezer i32 available for as little as $30.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Thomas Soderstrom is a Senior Staff Editor at Tom's Hardware US. He tests and reviews cases, cooling, memory and motherboards.
  • dstarr3
    In pros: "Silent mode capable under load CPU loads" Hmm?
    Reply
  • CalHob
    I assume it meant under low or light CPU loads.
    Reply
  • colinstu
    wow no numbers from the Hyper 212+ / Evo included??
    Reply
  • CalHob
    The pictures and article describe this as Freezer i32 product; that product has fluid dynamic bearing. The Freezer i32 CO product has dual ball bearing. Please confirm which fan design is included in this review. It would have been interesting to include a Hyper 212 product in the comparison as Artic has marketed the Freezer i32 as cooler than that product line. Seems unusual to review this product since it has been out for some time and Artic released an updated version compatible with all recent Intel and AMD sockets, the Freezer 33. But, they are so similar in design I'm sure one can infer 33 performance from the i32.

    Lastly, what do people think of weight as another factor to consider? There have been several times for me that I see only marginal difference in heatsink performance, but see that one is significantly lighter (say 30%) than another. Wouldn't the lower weight have a positive attribute in that it may reduce stress on your mounting and motherboard and thus result in better reliability?
    Reply
  • Adm1ra1P
    "wow no numbers from the Hyper 212+ / Evo included??"
    I instantly thought the same thing.
    Reply
  • FritzEiv
    19557389 said:
    In pros: "Silent mode capable under load CPU loads" Hmm?

    Whoops. Fixed. (I'll let Crashman respond to the other queries.)
    Reply
  • Rookie_MIB
    I have one of these, it's a decent cooler...
    Reply
  • Crashman
    19557945 said:
    The pictures and article describe this as Freezer i32 product; that product has fluid dynamic bearing. The Freezer i32 CO product has dual ball bearing. Please confirm which fan design is included in this review. It would have been interesting to include a Hyper 212 product in the comparison as Artic has marketed the Freezer i32 as cooler than that product line. Seems unusual to review this product since it has been out for some time and Artic released an updated version compatible with all recent Intel and AMD sockets, the Freezer 33. But, they are so similar in design I'm sure one can infer 33 performance from the i32.

    Lastly, what do people think of weight as another factor to consider? There have been several times for me that I see only marginal difference in heatsink performance, but see that one is significantly lighter (say 30%) than another. Wouldn't the lower weight have a positive attribute in that it may reduce stress on your mounting and motherboard and thus result in better reliability?
    Working backwards: Yes, lower weight is important particularly when you move your case around. This is a lightweight cooler. I don't believe we've tested a Hyper "Any version" on this platform, and we've been using it for two years: The Gammaxx 400 has replaced it as the budget cooler to beat. And thanks for pointing out the error: I received combined marketing materials and really needed to get the bearing references out of there. The six-year warranty remains, and is the biggest reason to chose this cooler over the Gammaxx 400.

    Reply
  • WINTERLORD
    yea thats wqhat im wondering how does it compare in relation to the cooler master 212 evo
    Reply
  • WINTERLORD
    calhob is the artic freezer lighter then the 212?
    Reply