Ryzen 7 9800X3D left Core i9-14900K in the dust in Battlefield 6 early streamer tests — both systems included an RTX 5080, but the 3D V-Cache system was roughly 30% faster
Consoles aren't left behind, though.

Tantalizing Battlefield 6 morsels have been making the rounds ever since the title's official announcement last month. The iconic shooter franchise is poised to make its return this year with a back-to-basics approach, something sorely missing from contemporary FPS titles. Add to that the disappointing response to COD: Black Ops 6 and EA has found themselves stirring the perfect concoction of demand for an AAA game launch. A couple of days ago, it revealed the relatively modest hardware requirements for the upcoming Battlefield 6 and, today, we allegedly have our first performance report to pick over.
Popular Twitch steamer, Bruhskey, took to social media to show off the game's average performance. Running at 1440p, they were able to get over 300 FPS on a setup consisting of an AMD Ryzen 9800X3D CPU and an RTX 5080 GPU — both attractive top-end components. Upon this foundation was 32GB of 6400MT/s DDR5 memory running in a 1:1 ratio, which explains the excellent 6.7-8.5 total system latency the streamer was able to achieve. The game is still under embargo so they couldn't say much, like whether any upscaling was used to hit those numbers, but in general ~300 FPS in a modern blockbuster title remains impressive.
BATTLEFIELD 6 Average fps performance was very good, NUMBERS/SPECS BELOW👇 330-370fps gpu310-330fps cpu6.7-8.5 PCL Latency Not allowed to show screenshots but for those asking, 9800x3d + 6400 1:1 2133 32gb + 5080 3200mhz core AND no optimized nvidia driver.August 1, 2025
In the same thread, Bruhskey mentioned that their friend rocking an Intel Core i9 14900K, and the same RTX 5080 GPU, were short about 110 FPS compared to the 9800X3D, signaling that the extra L3 cache in the AMD CPU was being utilized very well by the game engine.
Please add a sprinkle of salt to these comparison numbers, which we can't guarantee are representative of the finished game, or be certain were based on reasonably equivalent 9800X3D vs 14900K systems (all else being equal), among other potential issues.
The 14900K is the Blue Team's best-performing consumer desktop CPU at the moment, but it only has 36MB of L3 cache whereas the 9800X3D has 96MB, and in this case it trails behind its Ryzen counterpart by roughly 30%. This is a good sign for 3D V-Cache CPU owners because, if Bruhskey's right, they'll be able to get the most out of their processors, ensuring minimal chances of a processor bottleneck here.
These performance numbers aren't just limited to PC either, by the way, as the devs are working hard to push 60 FPS across all consoles as well. In an interview with Tech & Co., Florian Le Bihan, Principal Game Designer at Battlefield Studios, said optimization was one of the most important things to get right. Not only does every console, including the Xbox Series S, get a 60FPS mode by default, but you'll be able to cross that barrier with Performance Mode. On PC, of course, the sky (read: your hardware) is the limit, so it's great to see an AAA launch in 2025 not bogged down with unrealistic requirements.
Bruhskey did not attach any screenshots or gameplay clips to support their claims (because the game is under embargo) but it is probable that the game was running natively at 1440p since there was no mention of frame-gen or DLSS anywhere in their thread. That being said, Battlefield 6 will support all the major upscalers and feature real-time environmental destruction that the franchise is known for. The game is set to release on October 6, 2025 with an open beta planned for August 9-10. Everything seems to be lining up nicely for Battlefield's comeback, and initial impressions have been nothing but positive, to say the least.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.
-
Alvar "Miles" Udell Newer gaming focused CPU beats older non-gaming focused CPU in gaming.Reply
In 2025 does anyone really need to be reminded that X3D chips perform better in gaming than any non-X3D chip? -
txfeinbergs Well, the older Intel CPU is because it is the best "gaming" CPU Intel has produced. It would be even less fair to compare the current gen Intel against the AMD. The amount of performance difference is what is newsworthy here.Reply -
Alvar "Miles" Udell txfeinbergs said:Well, the older Intel CPU is because it is the best "gaming" CPU Intel has produced. It would be even less fair to compare the current gen Intel against the AMD. The amount of performance difference is what is newsworthy here.
Not really. The 9800X3D is about 33% faster at 1920x1080 gaming than the 14900K per TH's review with some games scoring upwards of 80fps higher with the 9800X3D than the 14900K, and the missing "about 110 FPS" is roughly a third of the 330fps, so it's about in line with existing results, with the difference no doubt dropping significantly at 2560x1440 and then to negligble as you approach 4K as is typical as the importance of the CPU drops compared to the GPU.
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/UacqtYWFJGCCzZSuS553nV-1200-80.png.webp -
Energy96
You are missing his point. If they compared it against the latest gen Intel (which is ironically worse than the previous gens) the gap would be even larger. Frankly hardly any point in comparing Intel to AMD at all on the higher end, They aren’t even in the running. X3D chips, even the previous gens are miles ahead. Intel needs to get it together, they have a couple years at most before they age into irrelevance. A new CEO was definitely needed but I’m not sure this new one is going to save them.Alvar Miles Udell said:Not really. The 9800X3D is about 33% faster at 1920x1080 gaming than the 14900K per TH's review with some games scoring upwards of 80fps higher with the 9800X3D than the 14900K, and the missing "about 110 FPS" is roughly a third of the 330fps, so it's about in line with existing results, with the difference no doubt dropping significantly at 2560x1440 and then to negligble as you approach 4K as is typical as the importance of the CPU drops compared to the GPU.
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/UacqtYWFJGCCzZSuS553nV-1200-80.png.webp -
Alvar "Miles" Udell Energy96 said:You are missing his point. If they compared it against the latest gen Intel (which is ironically worse than the previous gens) the gap would be even larger. Frankly hardly any point in comparing Intel to AMD at all on the higher end, They aren’t even in the running. X3D chips, even the previous gens are miles ahead. Intel needs to get it together, they have a couple years at most before they age into irrelevance. A new CEO was definitely needed but I’m not sure this new one is going to save them.
There's no point in comparing AMD 9000 series or 7000 series X3D to Intel anything when it comes to gaming at 1920x1080, they're always going to come out on top in the benchmarks.
But benchmarks aren't real life, and as Techspot just showed a few days ago when they compared a high end gaming oriented CPU to a mainstream non gaming oriented CPU across 4 GPUs ranging from the ultra high end 5090 to the mainstream 9060XT, you're not really losing anything at the mainstream level by using a mainstream non gaming CPU, a 9060XT or 9070 is just as happy with a 7600X as a 9800X3D even at 1920x1080, it's only at the upper midrange 5080 and high end 5090 that the differences show, and there are far more people who fall in the 9070 area than the 5080 and above.
https://www.techspot.com/review/3017-ryzen-9800x3d-vs-7600x-cpu-scaling/
https://www.techspot.com/articles-info/3017/bench/AV-1M-p.webp
https://www.techspot.com/articles-info/3017/bench/AV-1U-p.webp -
FunSurfer Drooling about how much FPS the upcoming 10800X3D with its 144MB cache and 7.0GHz will produce in BF6...Reply -
PixelAkami
Not guaranteed. Also that'll run hot if 7 Ghz is really true. 9800X3D's run hot unless you toss on an undervoltFunSurfer said:Drooling about how much FPS the upcoming 10800X3D with its 144MB cache and 7.0GHz will produce in BF6... -
Energy96
My 9950x3d runs just fine on a good AIO cooler. Rarely ever see it over 65c even under decent load and am running expo ram profile as well. I need to push it to 100% to even reach over 75c.PixelAkami said:Not guaranteed. Also that'll run hot if 7 Ghz is really true. 9800X3D's run hot unless you toss on an undervolt