Ads

Best offers

Ads
All about Miscellaneous
 Latest Miscellaneous articles
Exclusive Interview: Nvidia's Ian Buck Talks GPGPU

Exclusive Interview: Nvidia's Ian Buck Talks GPGPU
With Snow Leopard and Windows 7 both offering GPGPU capabilities, we wanted to talk to Nvidia's Ian Buck. Not only is he one of the fathers of Brook, the programming language ultimately adopted by AMD/ATI, but the head of Nvidia's CUDA group as well. Read More

  • Beamforming: The Best WiFi You’ve Never Seen
    Forget 802.11n Draft 2.0. The future of video-capable WiFi depends on a signal-boosting technique called beamforming. We put the pioneers in this frontier through some real-world testing to find out which technology is going to change the wireless world. Read More
All Miscellaneous articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post
Popular Searches

Partners

The Games selection

kids : Bob Throw bubbles so as to make the ones that appear in the game disappear. For this, use the Right / Left arrow keys to duck or move about, and the...
crazy : PC Breakdown What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
Ads

Sponsored links

Microsoft Reveals ''Mouse 2.0'' Prototypes

Next news
6:50 PM - October 5, 2009 by Kevin Parrish

Microsoft is taking the desktop mouse to another level.

Isn't it about time our trusty mouse gets a facelift? Microsoft Research seems to think so, and has developed five peculiar prototypes deemed as "Mouse 2.0." Of course, the prototype designs aren't final, and they rather look like dirty old droids pulled out of the Sandcrawler trunk by local Jawas (that's a Star Wars: ANH reference). But the company's intentions are clear: it's moving into multi-touch computing land using various touch sensing techniques, form factors, and "interactive affordances."

The first mouse, dubbed as Frustrated Total Internal Reflection (FTIR), uses a curved sheet of acrylic "edge-lit" with infrared light. The light scatters at the touch of a finger, and is recorded by an IR camera. The Orb Mouse, on the other hand, looks a bit more "mousy," facilitating multi-touch sensing on its hemispherical surface. This mouse uses an IR-sensitive camera and an internal source of IR illumination. Rather than sensing movement via scattered light, the camera picks up on light reflected back from finger tips.

The third prototype, the Capacitive Mouse, takes a different route and incorporates capacitive-sensing electrodes that track the location of the user's touch. This device looks even more "mousy" than the Orb version, providing the typical sleek design currently used with many popular mice. The Side Mouse, protocol #4, virtually takes the hand off the device instead and senses the user's fingers as they touch the table surface. "The key interaction possibility that we explore with Side Mouse is the ability to create a multi-touch area that is not restricted to the physical surface of the device," Microsoft said.

The fifth and final mouse is probably the oddest of the bunch, the Arty Mouse, appearing as a crab and providing mouse buttons on each "claw" or "extension." With the palm resting on the main body, each extension resides under the index finer and thumb, and tracks their movement. Microsoft said that it plans to refine the Arty Mouse--in addition to the other four prototypes-- to "deeper explore the interaction techniques that are specific to these new class of input devices." In the meantime, to get more details on each prototype, read the official study and take a peek at the demonstration video here.

Source : Tom's Hardware US

Talkback
Add your comment
nun 10/06/2009 1:02 AM
Hide
-0+

sound interesting

Renegade_Warrior 10/06/2009 1:06 AM
Hide
-3+

Hey look at what the Trashman dragged in! :D

XD_dued 10/06/2009 1:06 AM
Hide
-12+

Interesting, but likely expensive. If that's the case I'm fine with my lazer mouse :)

socalboomer 10/06/2009 1:10 AM
Hide
-3+

Sweet - break the mold, experiment with things that go beyond mice or even touchpads! Gotta admit, even though they look like things Jawas would mess with, the ideas are interesting!

njkid3 10/06/2009 1:24 AM
Hide
-0+

i am really looking forward to see these being further developed. they are really innovating here.

etichi 10/06/2009 1:29 AM
Hide
--1+

looks like microsoft gets points for bringing this out first. Apple is due to revamp there mighty mouse very soon.

acecombat 10/06/2009 1:53 AM
Hide
-20+

etichi :
looks like microsoft gets points for bringing this out first. Apple is due to revamp there mighty mouse very soon.


I hear by 2010 it's going to have...TWO BUTTONS :O

shadow703793 10/06/2009 2:00 AM
Hide
-2+

lol. I'd still stick to my G5, while those that have G9,etc stick to those. :lol:

IzzyCraft 10/06/2009 2:07 AM
Hide
-1+

etichi :
looks like microsoft gets points for bringing this out first. Apple is due to revamp there mighty mouse very soon.


You mean the shitty mouse i dislike, i like the onmi direction ball but i like my two buttons clear cut buttons and side buttons. still better then the power puck design

kingnoobe 10/06/2009 2:09 AM
Hide
-10+

Sorry... I think their all gimicks. Maybe useful for a couple things here and there, but unlikely what the general mass would use/want to use for that matter.

The mouse is simply one of those things... They got right the first time around and has only need tweaking here and there.

buwish 10/06/2009 2:29 AM
Hide
-0+

The clear looking one looks rather interesting...

Envinyanta 10/06/2009 2:32 AM
Show
maigo 10/06/2009 3:10 AM
Hide
-0+

they still do the same thing as any other mouse, so whats it matter?

khimera2000 10/06/2009 3:55 AM
Hide
-1+

the one that turns your desk into a mouse surface might be intreasting if they can combine it with the ability to recognize other objects and make some kind of interactive space.

ViPr 10/06/2009 4:55 AM
Hide
-0+

i thought this was going to be talking about 6 degrees of freedom mice. i've been bloody waiting ages for devices like that to become mainstream.

nbelote 10/06/2009 5:22 AM
Hide
-0+

"the one that turns your desk into a mouse surface might be intreasting if they can combine it with the ability to recognize other objects and make some kind of interactive space"

Multitouch trackpad in the shape of a mouse pad for your desk perhaps? Give it Bluetooth capabilities like MS Surface. Sure it'll be pricey but how cool would that be? The age of handheld controllers will be over soon... Hell, incorporate Project Natal into the PC and allow users to use hand gestures and the like to control desktop objects. Think "Minority Report."

goodgirls 10/06/2009 6:11 AM
Hide
-1+

As a gamer, I would like to have a mouse with force feedback.

Gin Fushicho 10/06/2009 7:41 AM
Hide
-0+

And this is why they are prototypes. how do I pay games with these things?

lifelesspoet 10/06/2009 7:50 AM
Hide
-2+

I like the mac mouse, but terrible non mac drivers and a 50 dollar price tag(70 for wireless) Just makes it unrealistic for normal use. No matter how many great things a mac product can do, it always has a few issues that piss everyone off.

wira020 10/06/2009 8:45 AM
Hide
-0+

i wish they could just focus on producing cheaper touch screen and making it more reliable.. dont anyone else feel like touchscreen is the way to the future?... i was kinda thinking that with all those smart phones now utilizing touchscreen input, that mouse would soon come to extinction...but i guess this article kinda proves otherwise...

barturtle 10/06/2009 9:08 AM
Hide
-1+

Could they just re-release the Trackball Explorer? Pretty Please?

jimmysmitty 10/06/2009 10:08 AM
Hide
-3+

acecombat :
I hear by 2010 it's going to have...TWO BUTTONS



So by 2020 they should have a two button mouse with a scrolling middle mouse button?

Then again with 2012 fast approaching they might never make it......

vh1atomicpunk 10/06/2009 10:22 AM
Hide
-0+

In my opinion, M$ has been making the best general-use mice around since the early 90's when mice started to become common place. M$ Explorer with a ball and wheel is the sturdiest (I have many that are 10+ years old at this point, still going strong) mouse I've ever seen, the weight and tracking speed are great. It's a quality product.

That said, I tried a more recent M$ optical mouse w/RF wireless. Very comfortable and well build, but would at least once a day cause my cursor to fly to the corner of the screen or cause me to 'spin' in any 3D game. Very annoying. I'm using a $5 wung-fung-chu brand from a wholesaler instead.

I'll try the M$ and Logitech laser mice in the future. Here's to hoping that M$ can produce another mouse as good as the Explorer.

chainsaw667 10/06/2009 12:10 PM
Hide
-0+

Trackballs Rule
"Mouse pad? Mouse pad, we don't need to stinking mouse pad!"

ssddx 10/06/2009 1:28 PM
Hide
-0+

The only viable option out of the bunch would be the one that turns your desk into a trackpad. However, I'd one up on that and say multi-touch screens are the way to go. Be that as it may, I doubt that we will ever see an end to the mouse/joystick. For pure functional design they are second to none.

mrface 10/06/2009 1:53 PM
Hide
-0+

it is quite hard to right click on ye ole mac

Eccentric909 10/06/2009 2:50 PM
Hide
-0+

barturtle :
Could they just re-release the Trackball Explorer? Pretty Please?



OMG Please!!! I have pretty bad carpal tunnel and can only use a trackball. I've found that I prefer them over a regular mouse anyway, even for gaming and especially for graphic design.

I have to use a Logitech Marble Mouse (ball on top) trackball now, since the discontinued MS Explorer Trackballs cost so much. I really want a scroll wheel, but all trackballs I've tried with scroll wheels have been pretty bad, including the Logitech Wireless Trackball. I've also not liked a single Kensington trackball I've tried, and for the most part they are just too expensive. Though, I might have to bite the bullet and try out one of these:
L-Trac

At least they are optical/laser tracking, instead of opto-mechanical like a lot of the other performance trackballs out there are (ie: iTac trackballs).

Please MS or someone, bring a nice affordable and durable trackball with a scroll wheel to the market (again). I love my $20 Logitech Marble Mouse, but lament that it doesn't have a scroll wheel.

deck 10/06/2009 3:42 PM
Hide
-0+

Eccentric909 :
OMG Please!!! I have pretty bad carpal tunnel and can only use a trackball. I've found that I prefer them over a regular mouse anyway, even for gaming and especially for graphic design.I have to use a Logitech Marble Mouse (ball on top) trackball now, since the discontinued MS Explorer Trackballs cost so much. I really want a scroll wheel, but all trackballs I've tried with scroll wheels have been pretty bad, including the Logitech Wireless Trackball. I've also not liked a single Kensington trackball I've tried, and for the most part they are just too expensive. Though, I might have to bite the bullet and try out one of these:L-TracAt least they are optical/laser tracking, instead of opto-mechanical like a lot of the other performance trackballs out there are (ie: iTac trackballs).Please MS or someone, bring a nice affordable and durable trackball with a scroll wheel to the market (again). I love my $20 Logitech Marble Mouse, but lament that it doesn't have a scroll wheel.




This is the mouse you want:

http://www.canadacomputers.com/ind [...] id=KBM.602

I bought a spare one in case they stop making them and my current one gets stolen or something.

bamslang 10/06/2009 4:03 PM
Hide
-0+

Grammar police here... will people PLEASE learn how to use correct tense and how to use the correct form of there/their/they're!?

etichi :
Apple is due to revamp there mighty mouse very soon.


kingnoobe :
Sorry... I think their all gimicks.


wira :
dont anyone else feel like touchscreen is the way to the future?...



Is toms's a place where a lot of non-English native speakers come to post?

On topic though, I'm excited for the new mice. I doubt they will fully replace the regular mouse or the 5 button. If they provide superior functionality for gamers, I'm on board.

eyemaster 10/06/2009 4:10 PM
Hide
-0+

There's something to be said about simplicity. Having a traditional mouse with buttons is great. The travel and response of the buttons on a normal mouse are the perfect mix of tactile response. You know when you clicked and it responds right away.

These new designs are more like a touch pad, where sometimes you're not really intending to click but it does anyway, or vice versa.

Still, even if I'm not a fan, I'm interested in how those will pan out.

ssalim 10/06/2009 4:49 PM
Hide
-1+

No. Mouse 2.0 will be scan and utilize brain wave. If it is not this, then it is not Mouse 2.0


Sponsored links

Related articles

  • Athlon KX133 Motherboard Roundup - A Nail-Biting Affair

    Friends of the AMD Athlon had to wait quite a long time: Until recently there used to be only AMD's 750/Irongate chipset for Slot-A Athlon platforms. We especially described the rather weak performance of the AGP and memory interface in our previous tests. The Super Bypass was obviously not the appropriate remedy for speeding up the now quite tired AMD750/Irongate. Finally, VIA is offering the KX133 chipset that comes with modern features like AGP 4x and an asynchronous memory clock up to 133 MHz. The new candidate sets high expectations on paper, but the support of upcoming CPUs has recently been castrated by VIA. The KX133 will not support Athlon's successor code named Thunderbird anymore. VIA, who originally planned to offer this support, withdrew from it due to stability problems with Thunderbird prototypes. On the other hand, AMD will not supply large quantities of Slot-A Thunderbirds to the vendors. Thunderbirds, which incorporate L2 cache on-die instead of using external cache components, will primarily become available in Socket-A versions (462pins), which are driven by the new KZ133 (VT8363) chipset. The only way to power up the few remaining Slot-A Thunderbirds now is Grandpa Irongate - it's quite embarrassing for VIA that they cannot offer upgradability for their KX133 chipset. Patience Required - Not For The Faint-Hearted! To say it right at the beginning: Compared to previous motherboard tests, this one really stressed our patience. Of course, some of the test candidates are early revisions with BIOS versions partially still in beta stage, thus not completely up to the demands of stable day-to-day use. But on the other hand we especially had quite a hard time to run the extensive benchmark tests under Windows 2000 Professional. Finally we decided to use the workstation version of Windows NT 4.0 SP6a, and ran the benchmark test on this operating system instead, in addition to Windows 98 SE. Windows 2000 seems to pose some kind of problem to both, VIA as well as NVIDIA. While VIA supplied only some half-baked support to the Win2k package, NVIDIA is unable to release a final Win2k driver for their recent chips, although Windows 2000 is now available for several months already. The two chips of KX133: On the left the south bridge VT82C686A and on the right the north bridge VT8371. Follow-up by reading the article 'VIA's Apollo KX133 Chipset and Windows2000 '. Architecture Of The KX133 Chipset At a closer look, only the new north bridge VT8371 differentiates the boards with KX133 chipset from the boards with AMD 750 chipset. Many motherboards with AMD 751 north bridge are already equipped with the new VIA south bridge VT82C686A, that is also used on the Slot 1 or Socket 370 platform for Intel processors. The south bridge VIA VT82C686A is a part of the KX133 chipset as well. The main improvements are in the north bridge VT8371, however: It contains an AGP 4x interface and a memory controller that allows asynchronous clocking to the front side bus and also handles a memory clock with 133 MHz. The north bridge of AMD's 750 chipset does not offer these functions. Another advantage of the VIA chipset compared to the AMD part is the option of using VC-SDRAM modules (Virtual Channel Memory) besides regular SDRAM memory. Here is a main function summary for the VT8371 north bridge : AGP 4x interface Asynchronous memory clocks of 66, 100, and 133 MHz Support of SDRAM and VC-SDRAM Overclocking of FSB clock to up to 155 MHz (optional) The south bridge VIA VT82C686A for different platforms (Slot A, Slot 1, Socket 370) principally only offers a few new features: Ultra-DMA/66 support for both the IDE channels 2 USB hubs with two interfaces each (4 port USB) A maximum of 6 PCI and 3 ISA slots ACPI support for suspend to disk/RAM Optional AMR slot for sound and soft modem Hardware monitoring and system management bus Very rare and almost not available on the market: VC-SDRAM memory is generally supported by all KX133 boards. The table below shows a general overview of the new features of the VIA KX133 in comparison to the AMD 750. Chipset VIA KX133 AMD 750 North Bridge VIA VT 8371 AMD 751 South Bridge VIA VT82C686A AMD 756 or VT82C686A Front Side Bus * 100/133 MHz 100 MHz Memory Clock 66/100/133 MHz 100 MHz Max. physical memory 2048 MB 768 MB Max. available memory 1024 MB 392 MB 33 MHz PCI at 133 MHz FSB yes no Asynchronous Memory Clock yes no VC-SDRAM Support yes no Ultra-DMA/66 yes yes # USB ports 4 2 AGP 1x / 2x / 4x yes / yes / yes yes / yes / no * uses Double Data Transfer mode thus doubling the effektive FSB bandwidth The north bridge VIA VT8371 is responsible for the main advantages of the VIA KX133 in comparison to the AMD 750. A Lot Of Inconsistencies We observed the following incidence several times during a test run; it could almost be listed under 'curiosities': With some boards (for example QDI Kinetiz 7A and LuckyStar) the initial startup in combination with a GeForce card did not produce a video signal - the system simply failed to boot. Afterwards we replaced the GeForce card with an ATI Rage 128 - the system booted without any complaint. Following this procedure and using the GeForce graphics card again, there were no more problems, however. Obviously not every user has a second or third graphics card available to investigate the cause of a failed system test. We do not have a definite explanation for this phenomenon either. More inconsistencies occurred with a few test candidates (like for example Asus K7V, LuckyStar) at exactly the moment when we set the jumper for the CMOS delete process after flashing a new BIOS version. Often the 'old' BIOS settings remained unchanged or the system refused to boot. Only after removing the battery for the CMOS memory and briefly switching on the board, the settings of the BIOS menus were deleted. We suspect that the CMOS registers of some boards hold the stored data longer than desired even without power supply. Driver Problems With VIA And Nvidia After optimizing the BIOS settings the tests ran almost without any problems under Windows 98 SE and NT 4.0. However, we experienced an increasing number of system crashes under Windows 2000 Professional. In addition to that, we had to switch on the AGP support under Windows 2000 Pro with our patched MACHINE.INF - except on the Asus K7V. But testing all candidates under Microsoft's latest offspring was more like an odyssey: We were unable to guarantee a reasonable and stable test run with any of the newer driver versions (available at www.reactorcritical.com ). While driver version 5.13 produced a black screen on a few boards in irregular intervals (for example QDI Kinetiz 7A, LuckyStar K7VA133) during the boot process of the system, version 5.14 showed significant instabilities during operation. Interestingly, the K7V gave the most stable impression. With this board we succeeded in determining all benchmark results - but only after several attempts. As mentioned, the attempts with all other test candidates under Windows 2000 were practically unsuccessful, and we decided to run all OpenGL tests with the GeForce card under the more stable Windows NT 4.0. We do not want to blame the motherboard manufacturers for those problems, because the boards were relatively stable under Win 98 and NT. We think that a missing INF update and a flawed Windows 2000 driver from VIA are responsible. We already contacted several motherboard manufacturers concerning this problem, as well as the chipset manufacturer VIA. We heard indirectly that VIA is actually working on the issue. BIOS And Overclocking There are hardly any differences among the BIOS functions of the test candidates. Apart from the Gigabyte GA-7VX that is equipped with an AMI BIOS, all other boards work with an Award BIOS. The differences were more in the number of functions: For example, the Asus K7V and Abit KA7 offer a large variety of special settings for the CPU core voltage, Front Side Bus and memory clock, and therefore appeal to overclockers, the remaining test participants, however, come with more or less standard functions. Recommended Bios Settings For KX133 Boards For all users who want to achieve optimum performance in conjunction with high system stability based on a KX133 board, we summarized the most important BIOS settings below. The described functions are principally available on all boards with Award or AMI Bios. The only differences may occur in the combination of the individual features. One major option for the memory performance is the "SDRAM Cycle Length", a.k.a. "CAS Latency Time". Memory modules with CL2 (CAS Latency Time = 2) are definitely better and significantly faster then modules with CL3. Operating a memory module with CL3 at a BIOS setting for CL2 endangers the stability of the system. Most memory modules (with CL=3) cannot deal with these short latency times. Another critical option in the "Advanced Chipset Features" menu is the "SDRAM Bank Interleave". Only few boards offer this function, but it leads to irregular system crashes when activated. Advanced Bios Features Spread Spectrum Modulated disabled Virus Warning disabled CPU L2 Cache ECC Checking disabled Advanced Chipset Features Memory Parity/ECC Check disabled SDRAM Cycle Length 2 SDRAM Bank Interleave disabled Memory Hole disabled Fast R-W Turn Around enabled P2C/C2P Concurrency enabled CPU to PCI Write Buffer enabled PCI Dynamic Bursting disabled AGP Master 1 WS Write enabled AGP Master 1 WS Read enabled AGP Fast Write disabled Special Features An interesting feature of the KX133 chipset is the support of four USB interfaces. All boards have access to this extended functionality. However, the additional interfaces do not change anything regarding the existing bandwidth problems when connecting special peripherals like for example a TV card. Most boards still come with WOL and WOM connectors (Wake up on LAN or Wake up on modem), which are rarely used. On the other hand, the query function for the opening of the housing is very useful, especially for the OEM business. Among all the tested boards only the Chaintech CT-7ATA is equipped with the appropriate pins. The KX133 chipset supports all modern ACPI features (Advanced Configuration and Power Interface) to lower the power consumption of all devices and to shorten the boot process drastically. We did not closely investigate both the modes STD (save to disk) and STR (save to RAM). PC99 Specification All boards of the test field come with PC99 color-coded connectors (PS/2, COM, sound and USB). Similarly coded connectors are still pretty rare in peripheral devices, however. All boards in the test field possess color-coded connectors according to the PC99 specification. This standard defines a common color code for parallel, serial, PS/2 and USB interfaces. To be completely PC99 compatible, a board cannot be equipped with an ISA slot anymore. Apart from the Asus K7V, all other candidates have at least one ISA interface. Completely Unused - The IrDA Interface In the era of wireless communication more and more peripheral devices possess an infrared interface for data transfer. This includes for example notebooks, cameras, speakers, cell phones or organizers. Every desktop PC based on a standard motherboard could also be equipped with an infrared transmitter/receiver. The majority of the test participants offer an appropriate Fast IrDA interface on board, but the right cable with an IR unit for data transmission is missing. The interesting point: Most manufacturers do not even carry this accessory as an option. There is full support from the operating system side, so we are not blaming Microsoft in this area - Windows 98 SE as well as Windows 2000 offer IrDA support with different transfer standards. With this in mind, it should not be too big of a problem for most motherboard manufacturers to optionally offer suitable cables and sensors. Surely, quite a lot of users would like to synchronize their data from the notebook with the desktop PC via an infrared link. The large PC vendors like Compaq, Fujitsu-Siemens or Hewlett-Packard have recognized this already and equip their systems with full IR functionality. Neglected and often unused: The IrDA interface is integrated on all boards. However, without the appropriate cable with IR sensor it has no practical use. On top of that: Most manufacturers do not even offer IR units as an option. Power Consumption At The Limit? It should be widely known by now, that boards with Slot A for Athlon processors have high power consumption. Just the 1000 MHz version of the Athlon processor itself uses up to 68 watts of electrical power. When a modern graphics card with Nvidia's GeForce chip is added, the voltage controller on the motherboard operates at the limit. Consequently the circuit transistors heat up very quickly. A weak controller in a fully equipped PC system might reach its capacity limit due to the number of components, which could lead to a system crash or unstable operation. The manufacturers integrated very different controller options on the 12 boards we tested. Epox and Asus, for example, installed a very safe solution by implementing generously designed power transistors and capacitors (controller stage). During the whole test these two candidates had the lowest heat increase. The controller of the Jetway 771AS left a less solid impression: During the test run the temperature of the power transistors increased even with very few peripheral components. Why the manufacturer did not include a heat sink for the transistors remains a mystery. This is what a strong controller design looks like: The four power transistors of the Epox EP-7KXA are equipped with large heat sinks and only heat up very slightly during operation. Overclocking Features Among all test participants only two boards are very suitable for overclocking: The Abit KA7 and the Asus K7V. Both boards allow variable settings for the CPU core voltage and the clock frequencies for Front Side Bus and memory clock via a comfortable BIOS control. But there are also points of criticism with these boards: Above 100 MHz the Front-Side-Bus can only be changed in relatively large steps. A continuously adjustable clock rate would be great, like Abit has already implemented it in the BF6 (board with Intel 440BX chipset). Overclocking fans could then better test the boundaries of their system with an almost continuously adjustable FSB. A Look At The Test Candidates Below is the detailed description of the individual test participants as well as a more in-to-depth investigation of important characteristics. We only comment on the special features of the individual boards. An assessment and evaluation of the performance follows after the individual descriptions. Abit KA7 Abit stays true to its image as overclocking-friendly manufacturer: The "Soft Menu III" of the KA7 offers numerous features for overclocking. The downside: When fully equipped, the six PCI slots quickly generate IRQ conflicts. The KA7 is the first board for Slot A from overclocking specialist Abit. It is the only candidate in the test field that comes with six PCI slots. However, they generate IRQ conflicts when fully equipped, especially under Windows 2000. The manufacturer did not implement the AMR slot that is found on a lot of the other test participants. With the "Soft Menu III" the BIOS enables elaborate settings for adjusting the Front Side Bus and CPU clock as well as the core voltage. The Front Side Bus scales from 66 to 155 MHz allowing to operate future processors with more than 1 GHz. Because of its special features the board is interesting for overclocking fans and convinces with quite a good performance.

  • Manufacturer Asus Asus Gigabyte Intel Internet Website www.asus.com.tw www.asus.com.tw www.gigabyte.com.tw www.intel.com Model NCT-D NCCH-DL GA-9ITDW SE7525GP2 Revision 1.06 1.02 1.0 1.0 BIOS Version 1000 BETA 000 (09/14/2004) 1001 (06/21/2004) F1 E(06/17/2004) P03 (06/22/2004) Form Factor / Size 26.8 cm x 30.5 cm 26.0 cm x 31.5 cm 30.5 cm x 33.0 cm 30.5 cm x 26.7 cm Power Connector 24-pin ATX, 8-pin ATX 24-pin ATX, 8-pin ATX 24-pin ATX, 8-pin ATX, 4-pin ATX 24-pin SSI, 8-pin SSI, 5-pin SSI Chipset CPU Support Dual XEON Socket 604 (Nocona) Dual Xeon Socket 604 (Nocona) Dual XEON Socket 604 (nocona) Dual XEON Socket 604 (nocona) CPU Clock (2200/2000 MHz) 3600.2 MHz (+/- 0.00%) 3600.2 MHz (+/- 0.00%) 3600.2 MHz (+/- 0.00%) 3600.2 MHz (+/- 0.00%) FSB Clock (200 MHz) 200.0 MHz (0/- 0.00%) 200.0 MHz (0/- 0.00%) 200.0 MHz (0/- 0.00%) 200.0 MHz (0/- 0.00%) Northbridge Intel E7525 Intel 82875P Intel E7525 Intel E7525 Southbridge I Intel 6300ESB Intel 6300ESB Intel ICH5 (FW82801ER) Intel 6300ESB (FW80001ESB) Southbridge II N/A N/A Intel 6700 PXH N/A Clock-Chip ICS952618BF ICS9D81088F ICS932S208DG Memory Memory Type DDR2 SDRAM DDR SDRAM DDR2 SDRAM DDR SDRAM Memory Speed(s) 400 266/333/400 400 266 / 333 Memory Modes Dual-Channel Dual-Channel Dual-Channel Dual-Channel Memory Timings by SPD by SPD CL 3.0-3-3-7 (SPD) CL 2.5-3-3 & 2.0-2-2 & 2.0-3-3 (SPD) Memory Sockets 4 4 6 4 Maximum RAM 8 GB 4 GB 16 GB 8 GB ECC / Registered Memory yes/yes yes/no yes/yes yes/yes System Components Piezo PC Speaker yes yes yes no (onboard buzzer) PCIE Card Lock yes no yes yes North-/Southbridge Fans no no yes (6700 PXH) no 4-Pin CPU FAN Headers yes (2 x CPU) yes (2 x CPU) yes (2 x CPU) 3-pin fan headers x 2 FAN Headers 2 x CPU, 4 x System 2 x CPU, 4 x System 2 x CPU, 3 x System 2 x CPU, 6 x system Voltage Regulators 2 x 4-Phase 2 x 4-Phase I/O Components Mass Storage Controller Intel 6300ESB Intel 6300ESB Intel ICH5 (FW82801ER) Intel 6300ESB (FW80001ESB) Storage Ports Raid 2 x SATA 150, 2 x Ultra ATA 100 Raid 2 x SATA 150, 2 x Ultra ATA 100 Raid 2 x SATA 150, 4 x Ultra ATA 100 Raid 2 x SATA 150, 4 x Ultra ATA 101 Secondary Mass Storage Controller Adaptec AIC-8130 (NCT-D(A)) Promise 20319 Adaptec None RAID Support 1, 0, 1+0 1, 0, 1+0 7902W (Ultra 320) 1, 0, 1+0 Secondary Storage Ports 4 x SATA 300 (NCT-D(A)) 4 x SATA 150 no Floppy Controller yes yes yes yes Primary Network Controller Broadcom BCM5751 (Gbit, PCIe) Intel 82547GI (Gbit, PCI-X) Broadcom BCM5751 (Gbit, PCIe) Intel 82548PI Secondary Network Controller no no no no Parallel 1 1 1 0 Serial (integrated / additional) 1 1 1/1 1/1 USB Ports (integrated / additional) 4/4 4/0 4/2 2/2 Firewire TI 1394 TI 1394 Texas Instruments TI 1394a none Ports (integrated / additional) TSB43AB22A 1/1 TSB43AB22A 1/1 TSB43AB23 1/0 Game Port 1 (Slot) 1 (Slot) 0 0 IR Connector 0 0 0 0 Expansion Components PCI Express (16 lines) 1 1 x AGP Pro 8x 1 1 PCI Express (1 lines) 1 (PCI E - 4 lines) 0 0 0 PCI Slots (32 Bit) 1 x 32 bit/ 33 MHz (PCI2.3) 2 x 32 bit/ 33 MHz 2 x 32 bit (PCI 2.3) 2 x 32 bit (PCI 2.3) PCI 64 0 0 2 x 64 Bit/64~100 MHz 0 PCI-X (1.0a) 2 x 64 bit/ 66 MHz 2 x 64 bit/ 66 MHz 1 x 64 Bit/ 133 MHz 2 x 64 bit/ 66 MHz Features Chassis Intrusion Detection yes yes yes yes Temperature Monitoring CPU 1+2, MB CPU 1+2, MB CPU 1+2, SCSI, PXH, LAN CPU 1+2 Fan Monitoring CPU 1+2, Front 1+2, Rear 1+2 CPU 1+2, Front 1+2, Rear 1+2 CPU 1+2, SYSTEM 1+2+3 CPU 1+2, System 1+2+3+4+5+6 Smart/Manual Fan Control yes yes no no Voltage Monitoring CPU 1+2, 3,3V, 5V, 5VSB V, VBAT, 12V CPU 1+2, 3,3V, 5VCC V, 5VSB V, VBAT, 12V "CPU 1+2, +3.3V, +5V, +12V, +1.8V, +5VSB, Battery, FSB VTT, DDR2 VTT, +3.3VSB" CPU 1+2, +3.3V, +5V, +12V, +1.8V, +5VSB, +1.5V, -12V, FSB VTT, MCH VTT Power-Up on... Keyboard, Mouse, Ring, LAN, PME, RTC Alert USB, PCI, Modem, Keyboard, Hotkey, RTC Alert, Mouse, LAN "Schedule, Keyboard, Mouse, LAN, Modem, USB" Keyboard, mouse, LAN, Modem, USB Power-Up after Power Loss off, on, last state off, on, last state off, on, Former-Sts off, on Other Features ASUS Post Reporter ASUS Q-Fan2 ASUS EZ Flash ASUS CrashFree BIOS2 ASUS My Logo 2 ASUS Instant Music ASUS Post Reporter ASUS Q-Fan ASUS EZ Flash ASUS My Logo 2 no 1 x8 PCI-E connector (wired x4) On-Board Audio Type ADI ADI Realtek none Chip AD1980 AD1980 ALC655 Surround Support 5.1 Channel Audio 5.1 Channel Audio 5.1 Channel Audio Jackets Mic-In, Line-In, Line-Out, SPDIF-Out Mic-In, Line-In, Line-Out MIC-In, Line-In, Line-Out (front ch.), Line-Out (F-SUR), Line-Out (Center & Subwoofer), Line-Our (R-SUR) none onBoard Connectors SPDIF-Out CD-In, AUX-in none BIOS Details Type AMI Phoenix/Award Phoenix/Award AMI Version / Date 1000 BETA 000 (09/14/2004) 1001 (06/21/2004) F1E (09/14/2004) P03 (06/22/2004) Update via DOS, EZ Flash DOS, EZ Flash DOS, BIOS (3.5" Disk), Windows Windows, Linux, DOS, USB, Floppy Special Features EZ Flash BIOS EZ Flash BIOS overclocking recovery ASUS C.P.R. ASUS C.P.R. yes no Configuration Setup via BIOS BIOS BIOS BIOS FSB Frequency Range / Steps 100 MHz - 400 MHz / 1 MHz 100 MHz - 400 MHz / 1 MHz always FIX 200 MHz fix 200 MHz Memory Frequencies 400 MHz 266/333/400 MHz 400 MHz 266 / 333 MHz auto PCIE Frequencies auto - auto auto Asynchronous - Memory: FSB auto auto Asynchronous - PCI/PCIE: FSB auto auto CPU Voltage adjustable adjustable auto auto Memory Voltage adjustable adjustable auto auto Chipset Voltage adjustable (PCIe) adjustable (AGP) auto auto Additional Information Model Variations NCT-D(A) with Adaptec AIC-8130 onboard SATA II Controller/ ZCR optional NCCH-DR Rackmountversion with integrated VGA (ATI Rage XL), second Gbit LAN ???? all Add-Ons from the Motherboard BOX Book 1 x Board 1 x Board 1 x Board On CD Board I/O-Shid yes yes yes yes Cables 6 x SATA 150 3 x SATA Powercable 3 x Floppy(1)/Ultra ATA(2) 3 x Floppy(1)/Ultra ATA(2) 6 x SATA 150 3 x SATA Powercable Bag of Jumpercaps 1 x UDMA 133 2 x SATA 150 1 x Floppy 1 x SCSI 4 Port + Terminator 1 x UDMA 133 2 x SATA 150 1 x Floppy 1 x Serial Slots 1 x Serialportmodul 1 x USB + Gameportmodul 1 x 1Port 1394 Modul 1 x Gameportcable 1 x SPDIF Out Modul with cable 1 x 1Port 1394 Modul no no Add on 1 x CPU Heatsink supportkit 1 x CPU Heatsink supportkit no Included Software 1 x Driver CD 1 x ASWM Servermanagement Software 1 x Driver CD 1 x ASWM Servermanagement Software 1 x Driver CD 1 x Driver and Documentation CD System Management CD

  • Manufacturer Iwill Supermicro Tyan Internet Website www.iwill.net www.supermicro.com www.tyan.com Model DH800 X6DA8-G2 S2676 Revision 1.0 1.1 TC45F BIOS Version 1.02 (07(/12/2004) 1.1 (08/14/2004) 1.03 (08/17/2004) Form Factor / Size 26.5 cm x 30.5 cm 33.1 cm x 33.2 cm 33.0 cm x 30.5 cm Power Connector 24 pin and 8pin EPS12V or ATX 24 pin ATX PWR, 12V 8 pin, 12V 4 pin PWR Connector 24 pin SSI, 8 pin SSI Chipset CPU Support Dual XEON Socket 604 (nocona) Dual XEON Socket 604 (nocona) Dual Xeon Socket 604 (Nocona) CPU Clock (2200/2000 MHz) 3600 MHz 3600.2 MHz (+/- 0.00%) 3600.2 MHz (+/- 0.00%) FSB Clock (200 MHz) Up to 250 MHz (for version 1.1) 200.0 MHz (0/- 0.00%) 200.0 MHz (0/- 0.00%) Northbridge Intel 875P Intel E7525 Intel E7525 Southbridge I Intel 6300ESB (HR) ICH5R Intel ICH5 (FW82801ER) Southbridge II Winbond W83627THF PXH+82546 GB Intel 6700 PXH Clock-Chip ICS952618BF ICS 9DB108AF Memory Memory Type DDR Unbuffered Memory ECC or Non-ECC DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 SDRAM Memory Speed(s) 400/333/266 400 400 Memory Modes Dual-Channel Dual-Channel Dual-Channel Memory Timings by SPD CL 3.0-3-3-7 (SPD) CL 3.0-3-3-7 (SPD) Memory Sockets 4 8 6 Maximum RAM 4 GB 16 GB 8 GB ECC / Registered Memory yes/no yes/yes yes/yes System Components Piezo PC Speaker no no yes PCIE Card Lock no no North-/Southbridge Fans no/no passiv no/no 4 pin CPU FAN Headers no yes/8x 4 pin Header 2 x CPU (PWM) no FAN Headers 2 x CPU, 3 x System 2 x CPU, 6 x System 2 x CPU, 2 x System Voltage Regulators 2 x 4-Phase 2 x 8-Phase I/O Components Mass Storage Controller Intel 6300ESB (HR) ICH5R Intel ICH5 (FW82801ER) Storage Ports 2 x SATA 150, 4 x Ultra ATA 101 Adaptec HOST RAID 0, 1 Raid 2x SATA, 2 x Ultra ATA 100 Raid Secondary Mass Storage Controller no Adaptec Adaptec RAID Support Dual Channel 7902 (Ultra 320) 1, 0, 1+0 (13 Drives) Supports up to 15 Ultra320 devices per channel on a standard cable configuration up to 12 meters 7902W (Ultra 320) 1, 0, 1+0 Secondary Storage Portsno Floppy Controller yes yes yes Primary Network Controller Intel CSA Gigabit Ethernet Controller 82546 GB Dual Gigabit Broadcom BCM5751 (Gbit, PCIe) Secondary Network Controller 4 (see above) no Parallel 1 1 1 Serial (integrated / additional) 1 2 1 USB Ports (integrated / additional) 4/0 4x rear ports/4x header 4/0 Firewire Texas Instruments TI 1395a 0 Texas Instruments TI 1395a Ports (integrated / additional) TSB43AB22A 1/1 TSB43AB22A 1/1 Game Port 1 (Slot) 0 0 IR Connector 1 0 1 Expansion Components PCI Express (16 lines) 1 x AGP Pro 8x 1 x (16x), 1(x4) using (x16 slot) 1 PCI Express (1 lines) 0 0 PCI Slots (32 Bit) 1 1 2 x 32 bit (PCI 2.3) PCI 64 2 x 32 bit (PCI 2.1/2.2) 2 2 x 64 Bit/ 64~100 MHz PCI-X (1.0a) 2 x 64 Bit/ 66 MHz 1 1 x 64 Bit/ 133 MHz Features Chassis Intrusion Detection yes yes yes Temperature Monitoring CPU 1+2 CPU 1+2, SCSI, PXH, LAN CPU 1+2, Front, Rear Fan Monitoring CPU 1+2, FAN 1+2 CPU 1+2, SYSTEM 1-6 CPU 1+2, Front, Rear, PSU Smart/Manual Fan Control no no no Voltage Monitoring CPU 1+2, +3.3V, +5V, +12V "CPU 1+2, +3.3V, +5V, +12V, +1.8V, +5VSB, Battery, FSB VTT, DDR2 VTT, +3.3VSB" "CPU 1+2, 12V VRM0 + 1 CPU VTT, 3.3VSB, 3.3V, 5V, -12V, 12V, Battery" Power-Up on... USB, PCI, Modem, Keyboard, Hotkey, RTC Alert, Mouse, LAN "Schedule, Keyboard, Mouse, LAN, Modem, USB" USB, PCI, Modem, Keyboard, Hotkey, RTC Alert, Mouse, LAN Power-Up after Power Loss off, on, last state off, on, Former-Sts on Other Features n/a IPMI 2.0 Supprt n/a On-Board Audio Type Analog Device Realtek Analog Device Chip AD1980 ALC655 AD1981B Surround Support 5.1 Channel Audio 5.1 Channel Audio 5.1 Channel Audio Jackets MIC-In, Line-In, Line-Out; S/PDIF Out MIC-In, Line-In, Line-Out (front ch.), Line-Out (F-SUR), Line-Out (Center & Subwoofer), Line-Our (R-SUR) MIC-In, Line-In, Line-Out; S/PDIF Out onBoard Connectors CD-In, AUX-in CD-In, AUX-in CD-In, AUX-in BIOS Details Type AMI Phoenix Phoenix/Award Version / Date 1.02 (07(/12/2004) 1.1 (08/14/2004) 1.03 (08/17/2004) Update via DOS DOS, BIOS (3.5" Disk) DOS Special Features n/a n/a overclocking recovery Iwill Smart Setting no Configuration Setup via yes BIOS yes FSB Frequency Range / Steps 1 MHz steeping up to 300 or higher always FIX 200 MHz - Memory Frequencies 266/333/400 MHz 400 MHz 400 MHz PCIE Frequencies - auto auto Asynchronous - Memory: FSB auto auto Asynchronous - PCI/PCIE: FSB a)66/33/100 b)72/36/100 c)40/80/100 auto auto CPU Voltage 1.1000 ~ 1.6000 step 0.0125 auto auto Memory Voltage CPU=4:5/1:1/6:5 auto auto Chipset Voltage 2.6/2.7/2.8/2.9 auto auto Additional Information Model Variations 10 Variations all Add-Ons from the Motherboard BOX Book DH800 User's Manual 1 x Board/ 1 x Ultra SCSI 320 Manual 1 x Board Board I/O-Shid Yes yes yes Cables SATA Cable+ SATA Power Cable Floopy disk driver cable ATA-66/100 IDE Cable 1 x ATX Floppy Cable 1 x LVD, Ultra 320 SCSI Cable 1 x ATA 100/66 Cable 2 x SATA 150 Cable 1 x UDMA 133 1 x SATA 150 1 x Floppy 1 x SCSI 2 Port + Terminator 1 x 2 Port Power Cable Slots 3 Jumper caps Two heat sink retention module IWILL Iron Plate Two Hat Spring Add on IPMI 2.0 card can be ordered 1 x Quick reference Sticker Included Software CD (contains drivers and utilities) 1 x Driver CD and SuperO DoctorIII Monitoring 1 x Driver CD 1 x RAID Driver Disk