Best offers
|
Core i7 I7-920 Quad Core Processor... | $349.99 Dell Home More info |
|
Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition Quad... | $185.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Core i5 750 Qaud Core Processor... | $199.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Core i7 Extreme Edition I7-975 Quad... | $974.99 TigerDirect More info |
|
Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition Quad... | $174.99 TigerDirect More info |
- compare processor performance
- cpu energy consumption
- running two graphics cards
- using dual power supply
- compare processors performance
- compare processor power consumption
- yearly energy consumption of pentium 4 processor
- cpu list idle power consumption
- low energy cpu
- table compare processors performance
- graphics card kwh
- power drawn by a desktop computer
- monster energy
- idle power consumption amd intel
- energy consumption of the system
Partners
The Games selection
crazy :
PC Breakdown
What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
|
kids :
Bob
Throw bubbles so as to make the ones that appear in the game disappear. For this, use the Right / Left arrow keys to duck or move about, and the...
|
Sponsored links

About 200+ Watts of idle power can easily be reached with a dual core machine running two graphics cards.
My desktop system I am using now is an Athlon 64 machine with an ATI X800 graphics card. It draws approximately 120 W in idle which equals 1051 kWh per year. Although energy costs can differ quite a lot, the 15 cents per kWh I pay should be a good average to reckon up from a global perspective. This equals $158 per year for having the system running 24/7 only. As soon as I turn my displays on or put the system under load, the number inflates quite a lot. An average of $230 is what I am actually paying per year.
This system is all but sophisticated today. Any fast Pentium 4 will help driving the power consumption up to 150 W or more, together with a decent graphics card of course. Using a dual core system will get you close to 200 and a CrossFire or SLI based dual graphics machine has no problems exceeding that. Please keep in mind that we are talking about idle power consumption only! Running CPU and/or graphics intensive applications will drive a single core, single graphics machine to somewhere between 200 and 250 W and a fully-featured dual core, dual graphics monster to energy consumptions of far more than 300 W.
Let's repeat the calculation with an idle power of 225 W for a dual core SLI machine. In this case, the annual idle power drawn would be 1971 kWh or almost $300! Of course the power consumption may vary with the efficiency of the power supply, but energy prices are certainly not going down again.
The following table lists the power consumption for low-end, average and high-end systems at low, medium and high energy costs. According to an article from USA Today, the U.S. has an average price of 8 Cent per kWh today. The high energy costs column can be considered quite normal for Europe.
| Low Energy Costs
(6 Ct / kWh) |
Average Energy Costs
(9 Ct / kWh) |
High Energy Costs
(25 Ct / kWh) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Low-End, integrated graphics (75 W, 657 kWh) | $39 | $59 | $164 |
| Average System (120 W, 1051 kWh) | $63 | $95 | $263 |
| High-end, dual core, dual graphics (225 W, 1971 kWh) | $118 | $177 | $493 |
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
Related news
- Intel Claims Core Microprocessors Saved World Economy $2 Billion In Energy Costs
- Sun, AMD call for creation of energy efficiency metric for servers
- Banking Crisis Hits Second Life
- With Intel increasing its technology lead, will AMD become more creative?
- AMD Improves CPU Market Share - With Little Impact On Intel





