|Samsung ATIV Smart PC 500T (Clover Trail)||Lenovo ThinkPad X230T|
|Asus Eee Slate|
|Samsung Series 7|
|System Drive||64 GB eMMC||Hitachi 320 GB (HTS723232A7A364)||SanDisk P4 SSD 64 GB||Samsung 470 mSATA SSD 64 GB|
|PCMark Overall||1261 PCMarks||2773 PCMarks||1508 PCMarks||2566 PCMarks|
|Lightweight Score||813 PCMarks||1318 PCMarks||1287 PCMarks||1994 PCMarks|
|Productivity Score||591 PCMarks||941 PCMarks||1100 PCMarks||1409 PCMarks|
|System Storage: Gaming||10.36 MB/s||3.71 MB/s||10.62 MB/s||13.44 MB/s|
|System Storage: Importing Pictures||3.56 MB/s||5.38 MB/s||4.69 MB/s||22.52 MB/s|
|System Storage: Windows Defender||4.39 MB/s||1.27 MB/s||4.20 MB/s||5.03 MB/s|
|System Storage: Adding Music||1.19 MB/s||1.18 MB/s||1.22 MB/s||1.38 MB/s|
|System Storage: Starting Applications||12.25 MB/s||2.06 MB/s||12.16 MB/s||30.98 MB/s|
The ATIV Smart PC 500T is a tablet with notebook-like aspirations. Its IA-32-based brains and Windows 8 heart mean you can install whatever you want, even if you probably shouldn't. How much slower is an Atom-based platform than one of Intel's Core processors? If you were to believe PCMark 7, it's not altogether than bad, coming close to Asus' Eee Slate with an Arrandale-based CPU. As we'll see on the next page, though, real-world apps don't reflect the same closeness.
But processor, memory, and graphics performance are only part of the story. Storage plays a big role too, and Samsung's tablet is interesting in that it allows us to benchmark an eMMC-based SSD under Windows 8.
If you're not already familiar with the differences between eMMC and the regular NAND found in SSDs, check out page 11 of The Amazon Kindle Fire: Benchmarked, Tested, And Reviewed, where we break them down. In short, eMMC puts block management and ECC onto the NAND itself, which you can see in the slide above.
The storage numbers show us that, in some cases, the 500T's eMMC-based storage can be substantially faster than a mechanical hard disk. That test is full of random reads, though. There are other storage subtests where the 500T is actually slower than the mechanical drive. In short, there are workloads where the Smart PC's storage performance is fairly impressive, and others where it's downright slow.
- Does Windows 8 + x86 + Tablet = Success?
- Windows 8's On-Screen Keyboard And Handwriting Recognition
- Doodling With The 500T's Active Digitizer And S-Pen
- The Atom Z2760: Specs And Theoretical Processor Performance
- Web Browser Performance: SunSpider, Octane, And BrowsingBench
- Can A Tablet-Oriented GPU Handle Desktop Gaming?
- PCMark 7: A Look At Storage Performance
- Benchmark Results: Photoshop, iTunes, And WinRAR
- Beyond IE10 And Multi-Monitor Browsing
- LCD Performance Analyzed
- Battery Life And Recharge Time
- On Paper, A Compelling Windows 8 Tablet