Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

PCMark 7: A Look At Storage Performance

Samsung's ATIV Smart PC 500T: An Atom-Based Windows 8 Tablet
By
PCMark 7

Samsung ATIV Smart PC 500T (Clover Trail)Lenovo ThinkPad X230T
(Ivy Bridge)
Asus Eee Slate
(Arrandale)
Samsung Series 7
11.6" Slate
(Sandy Bridge)
System Drive
64 GB eMMC
Hitachi 320 GB (HTS723232A7A364)SanDisk P4 SSD 64 GBSamsung 470 mSATA SSD 64 GB
PCMark Overall
1261 PCMarks
2773 PCMarks
1508 PCMarks
2566 PCMarks
Lightweight Score
813 PCMarks1318 PCMarks
1287 PCMarks
1994 PCMarks
Productivity Score
591 PCMarks941 PCMarks
1100 PCMarks
1409 PCMarks
System Storage: Gaming
10.36 MB/s
3.71 MB/s
10.62 MB/s
13.44 MB/s
System Storage: Importing Pictures
3.56 MB/s
5.38 MB/s
4.69 MB/s
22.52 MB/s
System Storage: Windows Defender
4.39 MB/s
1.27 MB/s
4.20 MB/s
5.03 MB/s
System Storage: Adding Music
1.19 MB/s
1.18 MB/s
1.22 MB/s
1.38 MB/s
System Storage: Starting Applications
12.25 MB/s
2.06 MB/s
12.16 MB/s
30.98 MB/s


The ATIV Smart PC 500T is a tablet with notebook-like aspirations. Its IA-32-based brains and Windows 8 heart mean you can install whatever you want, even if you probably shouldn't. How much slower is an Atom-based platform than one of Intel's Core processors? If you were to believe PCMark 7, it's not altogether than bad, coming close to Asus' Eee Slate with an Arrandale-based CPU. As we'll see on the next page, though, real-world apps don't reflect the same closeness.

But processor, memory, and graphics performance are only part of the story. Storage plays a big role too, and Samsung's tablet is interesting in that it allows us to benchmark an eMMC-based SSD under Windows 8.

If you're not already familiar with the differences between eMMC and the regular NAND found in SSDs, check out page 11 of The Amazon Kindle Fire: Benchmarked, Tested, And Reviewed, where we break them down. In short, eMMC puts block management and ECC onto the NAND itself, which you can see in the slide above.

The storage numbers show us that, in some cases, the 500T's eMMC-based storage can be substantially faster than a mechanical hard disk. That test is full of random reads, though. There are other storage subtests where the 500T is actually slower than the mechanical drive. In short, there are workloads where the Smart PC's storage performance is fairly impressive, and others where it's downright slow.

React To This Article