Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Results: SiSoft Sandra

Lenovo Erazer X700 Gaming PC Review: Is It As Fast As It Looks?
By

Famed for its ThinkPads, data center-oriented servers, and dependable office PCs, Lenovo is looking to carve out a piece of the enthusiast segment with its Erazer X700 gaming system. Can this sexy-looking setup stand up against our SBM configurations?

The SBM $2550 PC uses the same CPU as Lenovo’s Erazer X700, yet still outperforms it in Sandra Arithmetic by a fairly wide margin. The X700’s 3.9 GHz overclock performs roughly the same as the $2550 PC’s baseline, with XMP memory as its primary differentiating factor. Some manufacturers automatically enable fixed-ratio Turbo Boost mode when XMP is enabled.

To keep a processor within its rated power envelope, the amount of frequency Turbo Boost applies is supposed to decrease as the number of loaded cores increases. Enhanced Turbo sets a fixed boost frequency at the CPU’s highest rated frequency, which for the Core i7-3930K is 3.8 GHz.

Memory performance coincidentally scales in proportion to price. The expensive systems have quad-channel memory controllers, while the mid-priced builds are stuck with two channels.

Display all 64 comments.
Top Comments
  • 19 Hide
    monsta , November 26, 2013 9:39 PM
    Why do these companies insist on using tacky cases?
  • 10 Hide
    larsoncc , November 26, 2013 9:24 PM
    I won the $2550 computer featured in the Q3 SBM Marathon. I believe their scores using that system were 'slightly' hampered by fact that one of the 760s that was going bad. After RMA'ing the card, and using the same overclocks as featured in the SBM article, as well as moving the system to a high airflow case (Corsair Carbide Air 540) the 3DMark score is 19,100 (http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/7455484). Thanks Tom's!
Other Comments
  • 10 Hide
    larsoncc , November 26, 2013 9:24 PM
    I won the $2550 computer featured in the Q3 SBM Marathon. I believe their scores using that system were 'slightly' hampered by fact that one of the 760s that was going bad. After RMA'ing the card, and using the same overclocks as featured in the SBM article, as well as moving the system to a high airflow case (Corsair Carbide Air 540) the 3DMark score is 19,100 (http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/7455484). Thanks Tom's!
  • -5 Hide
    chumly , November 26, 2013 9:36 PM
    wtf resolutions are you testing? How about 1440p? Hardly ANYONE uses dual/triple monitor setups because the framerate sucks so entirely and 99% of the people on the planet don't have $5k to throw at a gaming PC. you are wasting your time. give us SINGLE monitor configs, for the love of god.
  • 19 Hide
    monsta , November 26, 2013 9:39 PM
    Why do these companies insist on using tacky cases?
  • -1 Hide
    chumly , November 26, 2013 9:40 PM
    ....and wth is an HD 8950?!?!?!
  • 4 Hide
    g-unit1111 , November 26, 2013 10:05 PM
    That case looks like it's going to transform into something.
  • 6 Hide
    dudewitbow , November 26, 2013 10:32 PM
    Quote:
    ....and wth is an HD 8950?!?!?!


    HD 8XXX cards are rebranded 7XXX cards for OEMS to use for marketing, cause you know, uninformed Consumers love to think that larger number means better and that new products(despite not really being new) convinces them to buy it. an 8950 should be a rebranded 7950
  • -3 Hide
    lunyone , November 26, 2013 10:34 PM
    What is this 8950?? Is it a R9 280x or something else???
  • 1 Hide
    vaughn2k , November 26, 2013 10:38 PM
    Nice review... I don't like how the wires are setup though... kinda ugly... ;) 
  • 0 Hide
    SWEETMUSK , November 26, 2013 10:45 PM
    the case is looking cool but,why they set the power at top?the power can't be hot it should set under the case and video card is not good
  • 8 Hide
    m32 , November 26, 2013 10:47 PM
    They could've put a R9 280x in it, but this isn't meant for the guys on this site. This is meant for sucke...... cough..... the average consumer.
  • -6 Hide
    lostgamer_03 , November 26, 2013 10:59 PM
    Radeon 8950? Sir, it doesn't exist.
  • 0 Hide
    djorgji , November 26, 2013 11:57 PM
    How come the 3DMark score of the O/Ced Lenovo is lower the than the stock one? It seems to be loosing a lot in Physics score. Are you sure the CPU is not throttling?
  • 5 Hide
    bryonhowley , November 26, 2013 11:57 PM
    Quote:
    Radeon 8950? Sir, it doesn't exist.


    http://www.amd.com/us/products/desktop/graphics/8000/Pages/8950.aspx
  • 5 Hide
    joditas , November 27, 2013 1:17 AM
    These OEMs make so-call "gaming PC" really need to know gaudy and oversized front bezel that take unnecessary space are the things of past. Without looking at some nice looking DIY computer cases out there, just take a look at design of next gen consoles. Those systems are used mainly for gaming yet they don't design their cases this way, why do these OEMs always think they have to design their "gaming PC" like this? What is more important are good cooling while keep noise own, preferably positive air pressure, practical features like easily removable dust filters for all intake fans, vibration cancelling fixture for HDD, and clean cable routing. The cables in this thing is a mess. I would say one thing good for the X700, the extra cooling for PWM is a nice touch.
  • 2 Hide
    Divyanshu Sah , November 27, 2013 1:46 AM
    The gpu could have been much better.
  • 3 Hide
    Crashman , November 27, 2013 2:03 AM
    Quote:
    wtf resolutions are you testing? How about 1440p? Hardly ANYONE uses dual/triple monitor setups because the framerate sucks so entirely and 99% of the people on the planet don't have $5k to throw at a gaming PC. you are wasting your time. give us SINGLE monitor configs, for the love of god.
    You got it. 1920x1080. I don't know anyone outside the company that owns a 1440p monitor.
    Quote:
    ....and wth is an HD 8950?!?!?!
    Read much? It's in the article.
    Quote:
    HD 8XXX cards are rebranded 7XXX cards for OEMS to use for marketing, cause you know, uninformed Consumers love to think that larger number means better and that new products(despite not really being new) convinces them to buy it. an 8950 should be a rebranded 7950
    Thanks
    Quote:
    Quote:
    Radeon 8950? Sir, it doesn't exist.


    http://www.amd.com/us/products/desktop/graphics/8000/Pages/8950.aspx

    Excellent! I see you guys have the thread well covered, thanks again!
  • -2 Hide
    lunyone , November 27, 2013 2:42 AM
    So we have a 8950 (7950 renamed) and it's between the R9 270x and the R9 280x....hmmmm what a bunch of crap if you ask me. It should be called the R9 275x instead to fall within the "New" naming scheme (which is crap too, BTW).
  • 0 Hide
    Metalrenok , November 27, 2013 3:12 AM
    "4 x Hyundai HMT451U6AFR8C DDR3-1600 C11, 16 GB (4 x 4 GB)"

    WHAT.THE.[removed]? It's Hynix dude!

    Watch the language. - G
  • 1 Hide
    Crashman , November 27, 2013 3:55 AM
    Quote:
    "4 x Hyundai HMT451U6AFR8C DDR3-1600 C11, 16 GB (4 x 4 GB)"

    WHAT.THE.FUCK? It's Hynix dude!
    Same thing give or take a decade, right?

  • 0 Hide
    Metalrenok , November 27, 2013 4:01 AM
    Quote:
    Quote:
    "4 x Hyundai HMT451U6AFR8C DDR3-1600 C11, 16 GB (4 x 4 GB)"

    WHAT.THE.[removed]? It's Hynix dude!
    Same thing give or take a decade, right?

    Watch the language. - G


    Yeah I know, but you say Hyundai and I start thinking in asian cars lol
Display more comments
React To This Article