Page 1:Enhancing High-End Value
Page 2:Motherboard And Graphics
Page 3:CPU And Cooler
Page 4:Case And Power
Page 5:Memory And Storage
Page 6:Hardware Installation
Page 8:Test Settings
Page 9:Benchmark Results: Modern Warfare 2 And Crysis
Page 10:Benchmark Results: DiRT 2 And S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Call Of Pripyat
Page 11:Benchmark Results: Audio And Video Encoding
Page 12:Benchmark Results: Productivity
Page 13:Benchmark Results: Synthetics
Page 14:Power, Heat, And Efficiency
Benchmark Results: Synthetics
3DMark Vantage appears to prefer AMD’s architecture, though it would have given our new Nvidia-equipped system a far higher score had we left the PhysX processing unit enabled. The problem with PPU scores is that they artificially inflate the CPU score, further removing the 3DMark score from actual GPU performance.
PCMark, on the other hand, was expected to favor the $3,000 system’s storage configuration. Our former machine used a pair of high-performance SSD drives in RAID 0, and PCMark is the only benchmark in our set to reflect the speed at which a system launches and closes programs.
Sandra’s CPU benchmarks point to the inability of our Core i7-930 to live up to its predecessor’s high overclock.
It appears that we should have spent a little more time tuning the $2,000 overclocked configuration’s memory timings.
- Enhancing High-End Value
- Motherboard And Graphics
- CPU And Cooler
- Case And Power
- Memory And Storage
- Hardware Installation
- Test Settings
- Benchmark Results: Modern Warfare 2 And Crysis
- Benchmark Results: DiRT 2 And S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Call Of Pripyat
- Benchmark Results: Audio And Video Encoding
- Benchmark Results: Productivity
- Benchmark Results: Synthetics
- Power, Heat, And Efficiency