The Motherboards Articles
- BCM QS750 Athlon Motherboard Review
- COMDEX/Fall '99 - Motherboard Manufacturers Report Part 2
- Intel's New CC820 Motherboard Review
- COMDEX/Fall '99 - Motherboard Manufacturers
- Athlon Motherboard Review
- Intel i820 Chipset Review
- 440BX Motherboard Review - Summer 1999
- Early Athlon Motherboard Review
- Preview of Intel's Upcoming 'Camino'-Chipset
- Preview of VIA's upcoming Apollo Pro+ 133 Chipset
12:02 PM - December 15, 1999 by
Thomas Pabst
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: rdram, avenger
Topics: Business
Syndication:
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: rdram, avenger
Topics: Business
Syndication:
Table of Contents:
Workstation Application Performance Under WindowsNT

Now we know why i840 is a workstation chipset! The i840-scores are up to 40% higher than the scores of BX, still up to 8% higher than i820. It's true, for a workstation user it may indeed be worth getting rid of his BX/GX-platform and investing in i840 and the expensive RDRAM.

These results remind us of the office application performance and the Sysmark98-scores. BX is as fast as, actually even a tad faster than i820. Why would anyone be interested in this chipset?
- Previous page 3D Gaming Performance Windows98,...
- Next page Summary
Hi,
REM: About the question "What should we see when testing the different chipsets against each other?"
Likely, or may be not, who knows.