Page 2:Test System Specs And Methodology
Page 3:Ubuntu Software Center, Evolved
Page 4:What's New And What's Changed
Page 5:Look And Feel
Page 6:Test System Experiences And Observations
Page 7:Benchmark Results: Boot, Hibernate, Wake, And Shut Down Times
Page 8:Benchmark Results: File Copy And Compression Times
Page 9:Benchmark Results: Multimedia
Page 10:Benchmark Results: Peacekeeper And GeekBench
Page 11:Benchmark Results: UNiGiNE Heaven
Page 12:Benchmark Results: Tropics, Sanctuary, And Lightsmark
Page 13:Benchmark Results: Games
Taking into account changes to the OS, new additions, personal observations, and overall end-user experience, Ubuntu 10.04 LTS is definitely worth an upgrade. I had limited issues across five very different test systems, none of which were deal-breakers. This is a far cry from the past two pitiful October releases, 9.10 Karmic Koala and 8.10 “Intrepid Ibex." Lucid has also shown itself to not only be a worthy successor to the previous LTS release, 8.04 Hardy Heron, but also an overall improvement to our previous favorite Linux distro, Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope.
Areas that were previously weak on the Linux desktop, such as volume mounting, user account access, video editing, retail music, cloud storage, and WiFi drivers have all been taken care of over the past two years. In Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, these changes have culminated in an absolutely fantastic product. I have personally moved all of the machines that I administer over to Lucid, and have recommended the upgrade to several people still running my tweaked version of 9.04.
If my critiques in this review seems a little lukewarm compared to the thorough bashing that I gave to Karmic, that's because they are. In Lucid Lynx, everything seems to just work- the first time! There's really very little for me to complain about.
While the numbers don't amount to a landslide, Ubuntu 10.04 LTS beat its predecessor, Ubuntu 8.04 LTS, in a solid sixteen out of twenty-five benchmarks. Lucid's performance only dropped below that of Hardy in Lame (MP3 encoding), Lightsmark 2008 (3D lighting), hibernate time, Blender (3D render time), 7z (file compression), FutureMark Peacekeeper (Firefox performance), UNiGiNE Tropics, UNiGiNE Sanctuary, and Doom 3. Among these tests, only Lightsmark 2008, Lame, and Blender showed 8.04 with any significant lead over Lucid.
On the other hand, Lucid is faster than Hardy in most of the tests, and by notable margins in several of them. With both operating systems running at their respective default settings, the Hardy Heron can stand on its own against the Lucid Lynx. But when all variables (video drivers and desktop effects) are equal, the bird is absolutely no match for the kitty.
The one thing I've noticed about the release of Lucid Lynx is the lack of fanfare. I spoke about the dangers of a failed launch in the conclusion of our last Ubuntu review. I believe the tepid reception for Lucid Lynx is due to the colossal letdown that was Karmic Koala. That release had all the buzz in the world, and when it finally arrived, it sucked big time. I saw the same thing happen to 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope due to the lackluster product that was 8.10 Intrepid Ibex.
Canonical needs to break the cycle of good April release, over-hyped (but poor) October release, under-appreciated April release, over-hyped October release, and so on. When the next installment, Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat arrives in October, we'll see how the company handles it. Canonical has already stated that it is switching gears to move toward GNOME 3.0 development, now available in the repos as GNOME Shell.
Unfortunately, I don't hold out that much hope for a change in this pattern. I'm sure that the slow-building momentum of Lucid will just fuel the Maverick hype-machine. And I'm also sure that, ready or not, Canonical will give the upcoming release top billing on its Web site, pushing the LTS download link into a hidden drop-down menu, like always. If my early experience with GNOME-Shell is any indication, Meerkat will probably be the most half-baked release for Ubuntu possibly ever (think KDE 4.0, but buggier). Hopefully, it'll realize that the next release is going to be highly experimental (more so than any previous October releases), label it as such, and stick by the Long Term Support product. Only time will tell.
The Bottom Line
The bottom line is that this operating system installed flawlessly on all five of our test systems. It also performed quite well, showing both significant and incremental improvements in most areas over the previous Long Term Support release. The stacked feature set, unparalleled ease-of-use, rock-solid stability, and heavy coat of polish make Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx the most approachable Linux OS to date.
So, it is without an ounce of trepidation that we are unseating the now one year-old Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope and calling Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx the desktop Linux distro king.
- Test System Specs And Methodology
- Ubuntu Software Center, Evolved
- What's New And What's Changed
- Look And Feel
- Test System Experiences And Observations
- Benchmark Results: Boot, Hibernate, Wake, And Shut Down Times
- Benchmark Results: File Copy And Compression Times
- Benchmark Results: Multimedia
- Benchmark Results: Peacekeeper And GeekBench
- Benchmark Results: UNiGiNE Heaven
- Benchmark Results: Tropics, Sanctuary, And Lightsmark
- Benchmark Results: Games