ViewSonic XG2703-GS QHD G-Sync Monitor Review

Of the two adaptive-refresh technologies, G-Sync was first to market, but its price premium made progress and acceptance a slow process. But once FreeSync became available, it seemed that every manufacturer was jumping on the gaming monitor bandwagon. Today, most company product lines include both video processing methods even though G-Sync’s roughly $200-higher price still remains.

We’ve seen a bit of evolution in the latest module that includes an HDMI input and ULMB standard on all displays, regardless of maker. But that doesn’t necessarily mean every panel will perform the same. Pixel response and overdrive implementation make a huge difference in visual clarity and motion quality. So it’s not enough to simply check the G-Sync box and go on your merry way. You have to look more deeply, and that’s what we’re here to do.

Today, the ViewSonic XG2703-GS is on our test bench. It’s an AHVA (IPS) panel with QHD resolution, 350cd/m2 brightness, ULMB, 165Hz with overclock, and a full array of gaming-oriented features.

Specifications

MORE: Display Calibration 101

MORE: The Science Behind Tuning Your Monitor

It’s evident from initial power-up that ViewSonic has taken its time developing the XG2703-GS rather than rushing into the fray with a half-finished product. By using an AHVA panel, it falls into the luxury category rather than something used by those seeking every last ounce of performance. Though IPS offers superior image quality, it lags just a bit in speed compared to TN panels. The highest refresh rates and lowest latency numbers still belong to that technology.

AHVA offers slightly better color saturation when properly implemented and far superior off-axis image quality. To this, ViewSonic adds G-Sync, overclock to 165Hz, ULMB with variable pulse-width, multiple gaming modes, and solid build quality.

Ultimately, however, it’s accuracy and gaming chops that separate the best from the rest. ViewSonic is a fairly new player in the genre, but it’s had plenty of time to avoid the mistakes made by others. The XG2703-GS is priced close to the competition, so we’ll have to dig deep and see what might set it apart. Let’s take a look.

Packaging, Physical Layout & Accessories

The XG2703-GS’s packaging doesn’t scream gaming monitor. ViewSonic packs it in a generously-sized carton with plenty of space for protective foam. In fact, it does little to indicate its gaming intentions other than the application of its XG logo.

The panel, upright, and base are already assembled, so all you have to do is unwrap it and peel off a half-dozen bits of scratch-resistant plastic tape. The power supply is a medium-sized external brick. Included cables are USB 3.0 and DisplayPort. There is no HDMI, though few users would need it since that interface supports neither G-Sync nor 165Hz.

Product 360

The anti-glare layer is a typical 3H-hardness plastic that is fitted tightly to the TFT for clarity’s sake. The image is quite sharp but our sample suffered from a bit of light-bleed in the corners. It only mars the darkest images and may not appear on all examples.

The bezel is narrow at 11mm at the sides and top. Multiple XG2703-GSs will fit nicely together in a two or three-screen setup. The base is wide and deep and swivels with the panel. It floats just far enough above the desk to avoid rubbing. Swivel is 175° to either side, which means you can turn the screen towards someone sitting across from you. Just the thing to do when you’ve owned someone in a frag-fest. Height adjustment is 4” with 5° forward tilt and 15° back.

The upright has a couple of neat features. Most prominent is the cable management hole which is trimmed in a lime green. This matches the subtle trim found above and below the screen. Also around back is a small flip-out hanger. It took fingernail-breaking force to free it from its closed state. In fact, we had to use a screwdriver to pry it open. Don’t snap it back all the way and it will operate a little more safely. It’s endowed with a thick green rubber pad to keep your headphones from falling off.

The back is nicely styled with a small vent and polished surfaces to offset the sea of black plastic. A 100mm VESA mount is revealed by unscrewing the upright. The tiny speakers fire backwards so a nearby wall will help reflect their thin, weak sound towards you. Take our advice and plug in a decent pair of headphones instead. More ventilation is provided along the top edge, though the XG2703-GS runs very cool, even after long gaming sessions.

Styling dictates a relatively thick side profile that is 3" deep. The right edge contains two USB 3.0 ports, and you can also see the control keys, which feel more like tiny levers than buttons. They click satisfyingly and make OSD navigation reasonably intuitive, though they won’t replace the joysticks we love so much on LG and Asus displays.

The input panel is pretty sparse, like all G-Sync monitors. There is one each of DisplayPort and HDMI only. You’ll have to use the latter to unlock all the XG2703-GS’s adaptive refresh and 165Hz capabilities. HDMI works fine for things like Blu-ray players or gaming consoles that are limited to 60Hz and FHD output. Also down here are the remaining USB ports, one upstream and two downstream.

MORE: Best Computer Monitors

MORE: How To Choose A Monitor

MORE: All Monitor Content

Create a new thread in the Reviews comments forum about this subject
35 comments
    Your comment
  • dstarr3
    "120Hz ULMB... 1440p IPS panel... looking good so far..."
    *checks price*
    "Sigh... Figures..."
    2
  • Sam Hain
    Ditch that 1970's avocado green accent color! Why for?
    2
  • Dantte
    Slow, glows like it was built in a nuclear test zone, and no contrast to speak of. But hey, your red is very red, your blue is very blue, your green is very green, and if you stare at your monitor from the side (cause thats how everyone is doing it); IPS is the monitor for you!
    1
  • 10tacle
    So who makes the actual panel? LG? Samsung? Regarding the price, I see it on Amazon and NewEgg right now for $650 (US). Considering I paid over $500 for my Dell U2713HM 27" 1440p 60Hz IPS monitor back in 2013, I'd say this is an excellent bargain.

    Regarding out of box calibration, you can buy a very good monitor calibration tool like Datacolor's SpyderCHECKR 24 for $50. Well worth the investment if you care about color accuracy on not only your PC and laptop monitors, but your HDTVs.
    -4
  • 10tacle
    Never mind, I found the answer on another website's review. The panel is made by AU Optronics (merger of Acer Display Technology and Unipac Optoelectronics). Going forward on monitor reviews can you guys please include information on who makes the panel?
    2
  • coolitic
    3H AG is awful for any high-quality monitor and the low brightness will make ULMB subpar.
    0
  • bentonsl_2010
    If you read the article you would of seen that they stated the panel is made by AU Optronics
    0
  • the nerd 389
    Just curious: why do you calibrate to a gamma of 2.2?

    The sRGB standard, IEC 61966-2-1:1999, varies between 1.0 and 2.4 across the output range. I understand that the decision to write the standard in that way stems from how the CRTs of the day responded, so it may not apply to LCD screens.
    0
  • InvalidError
    Anonymous said:
    *checks price*
    "Sigh... Figures..."

    Don't expect G-sync to get significantly cheaper any time soon as Nvidia has a monopoly over the proprietary scaler it requires. The joys of single-vendor proprietary standards.
    -1
  • 10tacle
    Anonymous said:
    If you read the article you would of seen that they stated the panel is made by AU Optronics


    I did not read the first part of the conclusion page which is where it is referenced. So it was my bad. Still, I would expect that info to be mentioned in the introduction page, not the conclusion page.
    2
  • templarklimek
    Gents educate me on this. I just bought a 70" samsung 4K tv as a monitor. 120 refresh rate. It's HUGE and a wonderful display. $1100.00(returned to microcenter). Why not use 40-65 inch TV'S? Thanks
    -1
  • KrazedMaddy
    templarklimek said:
    "Gents educate me on this. I just bought a 70" samsung 4K tv as a monitor. 120 refresh rate. It's HUGE and a wonderful display. $1100.00(returned to microcenter). Why not use 40-65 inch TV'S? Thanks"

    My experience with tv's is that most don't have display port. So running 1440p at 120hz won't work with HDMI. You won't even get 4k at 60hz. That means at 4k you will get a max of 30hz on HDMI and it won't be a great regular experience with a computer attached. Also the other problem is contrast and color accuracy. Many of these TV's and monitors have poor contrast and color which may not seem important until you use one that is good and realize you don't want to go back to poor quality.
    0
  • Gillerer
    Anonymous said:
    Gents educate me on this. I just bought a 70" samsung 4K tv as a monitor. 120 refresh rate. It's HUGE and a wonderful display. $1100.00(returned to microcenter). Why not use 40-65 inch TV'S? Thanks


    TVs advertized as "120 Hz" don't usually accept 120 Hz input, but only 60 Hz and then interpolate every other frame displayed to achieve the 120 Hz.

    Some brands even go as far as advertizing "SpecialProprietarySmoothMotion(TM) (or whatever) 240 Hz", where in reality they only accept 60 Hz input, interpolate to 120 Hz, and then use various motion smoothing techniques that (according to the marketing) will achieve motion fluidity comparable to real 240 Hz video.

    Common to both the above cases is that TVs have various techniques in place that are meant to smoothen the motion of video, but at the same time increase response time in interactive use (user input affects what happens on the screen), which doesn't work well for fast-paced gaming. Some TVs have a game mode that may have less processing to reduce the latency.

    Neither G-Sync or FreeSync/DisplayPort Adaptive Sync are used in TVs (and they usually don't have DisplayPort), so this makes them inferior when dealing with fast-paced games.
    4
  • templarklimek
    Anonymous said:
    templarklimek said:
    "Gents educate me on this. I just bought a 70" samsung 4K tv as a monitor. 120 refresh rate. It's HUGE and a wonderful display. $1100.00(returned to microcenter). Why not use 40-65 inch TV'S? Thanks"

    My experience with tv's is that most don't have display port. So running 1440p at 120hz won't work with HDMI. You won't even get 4k at 60hz. That means at 4k you will get a max of 30hz on HDMI and it won't be a great regular experience with a computer attached. Also the other problem is contrast and color accuracy. Many of these TV's and monitors have poor contrast and color which may not seem important until you use one that is good and realize you don't want to go back to poor quality.


    Thank you, but the samsung will let you run@60HZ@4K. I agree on many TV's not looking crisp though. The samsung has a "crisp/bright mode. Just think 70 inch monitor. ;)
    0
  • Gillerer
    Anonymous said:
    Thank you, but the samsung will let you run@60HZ@4K. I agree on many TV's not looking crisp though. The samsung has a "crisp/bright mode. Just think 70 inch monitor. ;)


    I have to say 70 inches is far too large to use as a monitor (meaning within ~1 meter viewing distance). The angle between the edges of the monitor becomes so large that you can't view the entire display at a glance. Essentially having a tunnel vision is especially bad if you're playing competetive multiplayer games.

    The pixels on a 70 inch 4K UHD TV become distractingly large if viewed from monitor use distances. The pixel size is the same as on a 35" FullHD display.
    0
  • dstarr3
    Anonymous said:
    Anonymous said:
    Gents educate me on this. I just bought a 70" samsung 4K tv as a monitor. 120 refresh rate. It's HUGE and a wonderful display. $1100.00(returned to microcenter). Why not use 40-65 inch TV'S? Thanks


    TVs advertized as "120 Hz" don't usually accept 120 Hz input, but only 60 Hz and then interpolate every other frame displayed to achieve the 120 Hz.


    This. I don't know if I've ever heard of a TV that natively accepted a true 120Hz signal.
    0
  • ledhead11
    Not a fan of NV G-Sync tax, but with my P27q and 1080ti it's a perfect match. Really is a experience to see ultra settings w/ 80-130fps and no tearing. Reminds of those old school games from the 80-90's when tearing wasn't really a thought. And BTW at 4k tearing can make you dizzy so 1440p G-Sync can feel really nice.

    That being said I'm at least happy that other companies are coming forward with some competition. Might help lower some prices in the future.

    Thank's Toms for the review!
    0
  • Co BIY
    The verdict seemed positive but no TH 'approved' stamp?
    0
  • xXBananasXx
    Is this monitor better than the asus pg279q or the acer xh271hu?
    1
  • zodiacfml
    There should be a brief discussion between AMVA and AHVA which I have to search for. AHVA is nice for ultrawides or those exceeding 27" diagonals but I prefer AMVA for the physical dimensions of this screen.
    0