Intel Core i5-14400 Review: Intel's value gaming chip falls behind AMD

The Intel 7 refresh train chugs along.

Core i5-14400
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The 14th-gen Intel Core i5-14400 is an underwhelming and lackluster refresh of the prior generation, and the minor frequency tweaks don't equate to meaningful performance gains in real-world applications. However, pricing for Ryzen chips and motherboards has improved, making them the better option for builders looking for the best value.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Memory overclocking

  • +

    Balanced performance in gaming and applications

  • +

    Adequate bundled cooler

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Pricing relative to AMD Ryzen

  • -

    Minor frequency improvements that don't translate to real-world performance gains

  • -

    No CPU core overclocking

  • -

    Power increases for minimal gain

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

The $225 14th-gen Intel Core i5-14400 comes to market packing the same blend of performance in productivity applications and gaming as its predecessor, and you can also find the graphics-less i5-14400F model for $15 less, even though it offers the same level of performance. However, the new 14th-gen Intel models are a lackluster refresh of the existing 13th-gen chips yet still carry the same pricing, and that isn't enough to climb the ranks of our CPU benchmark hierarchy and take a spot on our list of the best CPUs for gaming.

Intel's Core i5 lineup is feeling the pressure of price reductions to the Ryzen 5 7600 and 7600X, which has substantially improved their value proposition. Lower DDR5 memory and motherboard pricing have also helped catapult Ryzen back into contention for value-centric builds. 

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • -Fran-
    Snake oil? Le gasp!

    In any case, I have to say I'm surprised the perf/$ kind of sucks with this chip (not suck, but not beat AMD as it was the case). This was the last bastion for Intel to claim "superiority" from recent memory, so it's surprising.

    Thanks for the review and great data, Paul!

    Regards.
    Reply
  • usertests
    I didn't realize the 7600X was that far behind the 5000X3D CPUs.

    Seems the gap is wider than this review:
    https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-9-7950x-ryzen-5-7600x-cpu-review/6
    Reply
  • edzieba
    Particular for DIY upgraders, the DDR4 aspect for Raptor Lake still likely makes it more attractive in total upgrade (CPU + mobo + RAM) perf/$. Even with DDR5 getting less expensive, it will still be more expensive than paying nothing to re-use your current DDR4 DIMMs.
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    -Fran- said:
    Snake oil? Le gasp!

    In any case, I have to say I'm surprised the perf/$ kind of sucks with this chip (not suck, but not beat AMD as it was the case). This was the last bastion for Intel to claim "superiority" from recent memory, so it's surprising.

    Thanks for the review and great data, Paul!

    Regards.
    I'm just wondering, but what exactly is surprising about a company having to sell older technology for less money, or newer for more, anyway you take it.

    The 7600x was $300 when it came out...and now AMD is forced to sell it for 70% of that because of the x3d CPUs and the newer intel CPUs, even though it is current gen.
    Reply
  • Glutonias Hambonias
    Maybe Ryzen will start to pull ahead.
    Reply
  • rluker5
    The 14th series pricing is not the best compared to older named products. You can buy the same chip, but faster, unlocked and at 2/3 the price at Newegg right now: the 12600kf https://www.newegg.com/intel-core-i5-12600kf-core-i5-12th-gen/p/N82E16819118349
    It would probably beat the 7600x(at $210) for $155. A real world performance/price thrashing. Although you would have to buy a $20 cooler if you didn't already have one: https://www.amazon.com/Thermalright-Assassin-SE-Heatpipes-TL-C12C/dp/B09Y869Z8B/ref=sr_1_20?crid=2SX1Y3LFI5SQZ&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.oWn8-RfUPfvuDzeOWU8_36bSlzc8uRnTjORmhoO2C0vsUFZ2STUVF1WtAEnZKG4Z-zUmrifpulpSJuMlZsGSFeEKCMLhJtaGVL11yTUskSdNXF1vBh_BKnhNbXbFp3tXCfLhF5edknjQiEoY5HyH03kxieOlLxKUutlOXeloABhP1HFS0d8K3bcCwNERJBSq830llUJSSoS_NVuNQxFQtR_-9MBwMGiEx6rd9EcgLtA.GH6nMT41xmldgof1e-hTaPzaY_pNrkZhB5XDJ4IX1Mo&dib_tag=se&keywords=lga%2B1700%2Bcooler&qid=1713446673&sprefix=lga%2B1700%2Bcoo%2Caps%2C104&sr=8-20&th=1
    Reply
  • Roland Of Gilead
    The base and boost clocks for the 14400/13400 are reversed in the first table.
    Reply
  • strobolt
    I don't quite understand why the article mentions "adequate stock cooler" as a pro but then also within the article it's mentioned that "we always recommend upgrading the stock cooler". If the stock cooler is adequate then what's the reason for upgrading? I understand that some people who run very extensive multithreaded workloads and in warmer climate you might end up with excessive noise and even bottlenecking but the average gamer / productivity user in a airconditioned environment probably doesn't even notice the difference. And even in gaming when you want to run high fps, the GPU is likely going to make so much noise that the CPU cooler is not distinguishable anyway.
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    TerryLaze said:
    I'm just wondering, but what exactly is surprising about a company having to sell older technology for less money, or newer for more, anyway you take it.

    The 7600x was $300 when it came out...and now AMD is forced to sell it for 70% of that because of the x3d CPUs and the newer intel CPUs, even though it is current gen.
    Saying the i5 14400 is "new" is a big stretch given is a toss between being a re-hashed Alder or a defective Raptor.

    As for the price: Intel decided that price point, so they have only themselves to blame. I believe Intel thinks they can get away with people not doing their research (much like AMD does as well; 5700 non-G, looking at you) only looking at the price point relative to the rest.

    That's what is surprising to me: why didn't Intel read the room and chose such a price point that would make them look bad. Weird. Are they with no other options anymore?

    Regards.
    Reply
  • Amdlova
    You can grab a used 13500t on ebay for 175us. Cheap gaming little machine.
    Reply