Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.
Intel Core i5-14400 Productivity Application Benchmarks, the TLDR:
We boil down productivity application performance into two broad categories: single- and multi-threaded. These slides show the geometric mean of performance in several of our most important tests in each of these categories, but be sure to look at the expanded results below for more granular analysis.
The $225 Core i5-14400 is only 1% faster in multi-threaded and 2% faster in single-threaded work than the previous-gen Core i5-13400, an imperceptible difference between the two chips. In terms of real-world workloads, this is the same chip.
Again, we see that DDR4 memory with the Core i5-14400 delivers a slight improvement over DDR5 at stock settings. Memory tuning confers small gains in multi-threaded applications for both configurations, but there's no gain in single-threaded work. We also see limited uplift from tuning with the Ryzen models.
The $210 Ryzen 5 7600X is 6% faster than the Core i5-14400 in single-threaded work and 3% faster in multi-threaded applications, showing that it's a solid all-rounder if you prize performance in productivity workloads.
The $245 Ryzen 7 5700X3D uses the previous-gen Zen 3 CPU microarchitecture, so it loses steam in our application benchmarks. The Core i5-14400 is 10% faster in multi-threaded work and 27% faster in single-threaded applications, so it offers a much more balanced profile overall. However, the Ryzen 7 5700X3D is positioned for AM4 upgraders and those who are more focused on gaming, and there, it provides incredible value.
The Ryzen 5 7600X provides the best performance in productivity applications overall, again providing more value than the Core i5-14400.
Rendering Benchmarks on Intel Core i5-14400
The Core i5-14400 is 9% faster than the Ryzen 5 7600X in the Cinebench multi-threaded benchmark but trails by 8% in the single-threaded test. The 14400 also scores notable wins in POV-Ray and the various Blender renders, but the 7600X remains competitive in many of these workloads.
Meanwhile, the Ryzen 7 5700X3D predictably lags across the board.
Encoding Benchmarks on Intel Core i5-14400
Our tests include single-threaded encoding benchmarks, like LAME and FLAC, but the SVT-AV1 and SVT-HEVC tests represent a newer class of threaded encoders.
The Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms the Core i5-14400 in all single-threaded encoder benchmarks and leads in most threaded encoders.
Compilation, Compression, AVX on Intel Core i5-14400
This selection of tests spans from massively parallel molecular dynamics simulation code in NAMD to compression/decompression performance. Y-cruncher computes Pi with the AVX instruction set, making for an incredibly demanding benchmark.
The Ryzen 5 7600X carves out a lead in compression/decompression and y-cruncher, while the 14400 leads in compilation workloads.
Many of these tests aren't very relevant to the target audience for this class of chip, but we include them for completeness.
30-year-old Pentium FDIV bug tracked down in the silicon — Ken Shirriff takes the microscope to Intel's first-ever recall
Cyberpunk 2077 update 2.2 claims to improve Arrow Lake performance by up to 33%, theoretically matching the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Empyrean Technology gives control to CEC after U.S. blacklisting — China’s top developer of chip design systems hands reins to state-owned firm
