Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Zotac’s Ion-Series Motherboard: Added Value

Zotac's Ion Board On Windows 7: Nvidia Re-Arms Intel’s Atom
By

The board’s most endearing quality is, arguably, its size. Conforming to the mini-ITX specification means dimensions of 17 cm by 17 cm. Right off the bat, we’re thinking of this platform as a potential HTPC contender.

Naturally, a mini-ITX form factor also means limited PCB real estate for enabling features that the chipset natively supports, too. But Zotac doesn’t seem to have a problem there. Most of the board’s space is consumed by a large passive heatsink, which covers the dual-core Atom processor and IGP core logic. There’s a fan included in the retail package; however, installing it is optional. We went ahead and used the fan, since it really didn’t generate much noise.

Two 240-pin DDR2 memory slots accommodate up to 4 GB (2 x 2 GB) of RAM running at up to 800 MHz. They’re arranged in a dual-channel configuration (2 x 64-bit), so you’ll want to be sure and populate them at the same time.

There isn’t enough room for expansion via full-sized PCI or PCI Express slots, but Zotac does enable a mini-PCIe slot populated by an 802.11b/g/n wireless adapter. This’ll undoubtedly serve as a huge boon for folks who want to put diminutive Ion boxes in the kitchen, living room, or den—spots likely to be lacking Gigabit Ethernet jacks nearby.

The Ion board’s I/O panel is loaded with ports and plugs normally found on full-sized ATX platforms. Six USB 2.0 ports accommodate plenty of peripherals (there’s a PS/2 keyboard port too, just in case). You also get optical/coaxial digital audio output, along with analog line in/line out/mix in 1/8” jacks. Display outputs include standard VGA, dual-link DVI (our 30” test platform originally only ran at 1280x800, unless we had it connected to an HDTV; Nvidia subsequently sent us a BIOS to enable all of the board's available resolutions, right up to 2560x1600), and HDMI 1.3. Gigabit Ethernet and eSATA round out the feature list around back. The last connector you see is a power jack—the board (and all attached storage) is powered by a 90W power brick.

Zotac’s minimalist bundle includes a custom I/O panel, one SATA cable, the aforementioned fan, an instruction manual, and an adapter able to turn one four-pin Molex connector into three SATA power plugs.

More Than A Motherboard

Zotac’s retail price for this Ion-based board is $189—an almost insane price tag for a motherboard alone. But you don’t get just the motherboard. There’s also an Atom processor soldered on and the power brick, which keeps you from having to buy a separate power supply. All told, the combination is supposed to enable high-performance sub-$400 PCs.

Back when we first looked at Intel’s Atom processor in Shuttle’s X27 (and found it a cumbersome configuration), it was a single-core CPU running at 1.6 GHz. Granted, Hyper-Threading gave that Atom 230 CPU the ability to execute two threads in parallel, but it was still painfully slow.

The Atom 330 is yet another model from the Diamondville family, running at the exact same clock speed and sporting the same 533 MHz front side bus. The only difference is a doubling of on-package die, resulting in a dual-core CPU with Hyper-Threading able to address four threads at once. It uses the same .9-1.1625V range, and thus consumes exactly twice as much power: 8W instead of 4.

Those low-ball power figures are what lets Zotac bundle its 90W external power brick. We’ll get into the actual power figures shortly, but suffice to say, energy efficiency is going to be one of this board’s greatest selling points versus true desktop architectures re-purposed for this nettop space.

Display all 59 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 13 Hide
    SpadeM , May 12, 2009 2:36 PM
    Quote:
    Granted, we could have done significantly better in the power department had we been a little choosier with our CPU. The Athlon X2 7850 was attractive due to its $69 price tag, 2.8 GHz clock speed, and unlocked multiplier, but its Kuma core is still rated at 95 W. You can dip down to the $60 Athlon X2 5050e (running at 2.8 GHz as well) and cut your maximum TDP down to 45W for $10 less.


    If you knew you could have done better with a 45W not a 95W processor .. what gives? The supplier didn't have it in stock or why go for the obvious power monster?

    On a different note, I'm looking forward to the transcoding article.
Other Comments
  • 13 Hide
    SpadeM , May 12, 2009 2:36 PM
    Quote:
    Granted, we could have done significantly better in the power department had we been a little choosier with our CPU. The Athlon X2 7850 was attractive due to its $69 price tag, 2.8 GHz clock speed, and unlocked multiplier, but its Kuma core is still rated at 95 W. You can dip down to the $60 Athlon X2 5050e (running at 2.8 GHz as well) and cut your maximum TDP down to 45W for $10 less.


    If you knew you could have done better with a 45W not a 95W processor .. what gives? The supplier didn't have it in stock or why go for the obvious power monster?

    On a different note, I'm looking forward to the transcoding article.
  • -7 Hide
    one-shot , May 12, 2009 2:37 PM
    Everyone down-rates the first post which is posted by the author of the article. I'm not sure if anyone has noticed that yet because I see every author's first post down-rated many times.
  • 6 Hide
    teeth_03 , May 12, 2009 2:46 PM
    I thought the ION platform used the Geforce 9400 and not the 9300?
  • 2 Hide
    sublifer , May 12, 2009 3:04 PM
    Quote:
    Here’s the short of it. When it comes to running multiple apps at the same time, compressing/decompressing large archives, and yes, even trasncoding

    Just wanted to help: transcoding
  • 2 Hide
    wyvern287 , May 12, 2009 3:10 PM
    Does anyone know if this system can play Hulu videos?
  • 5 Hide
    hellwig , May 12, 2009 3:23 PM
    I almost wish you hadn't even tried playing games on it, but I suppose you needed some sort of comparison for the performance of the ION chipset.

    How many people will use this as a satellite PC in their homes, and what ever happened to Windows Home Server? I would think you let your central PC/server handle the computing and just use this guy as a remote terminal to stream media to.
  • 0 Hide
    Anonymous , May 12, 2009 3:42 PM
    I'm looking for a low power system like this... my old father leaves his p4 system on ALL the time, and wonder why his electric bill is so high :-\
  • 3 Hide
    siliconchampion , May 12, 2009 3:48 PM
    I love that they mentioned the GeForce 9300-ITX WiFi board at the end of the review. I used that board with an e7400, 4GB corsair, a low profile 9800 GT, a 320GB 7200RPM 2.5 inch drive, and an Antec 380 watt PSU. The reason I love it so much is three-fold.

    First, I put all of the above mentioned components and put them into the case from the original Xbox (while maintaning totally stock appearances except for the back.

    Second, the board boots lightning fast, and is a pleasure to work with.

    Third, before we put the 9800GT into the build, using the same 9300 chipset as the Ion platform, we were running HL2 on max settings at 1680x1050 resolution (except with only 2x AA) and getting 35-45 FPS. We also played Halo 2 on medium settings and that played very well also. Obviously, after the 9800 was added, the computer flies. That just goes to show you that the Atom really is what is holding back the capabilities of the 9300 chipset.

    All of this was accomplished with about $500, so it is a good budget computer that is inside of an Xbox. My i7 system has nothing on the "coolness" factor of this computer.
  • 1 Hide
    cangelini , May 12, 2009 4:20 PM
    teeth_03I thought the ION platform used the Geforce 9400 and not the 9300?


    The difference between 9300 and 9400 is clock speed. This one is slower than the 9300, even.
  • 0 Hide
    cangelini , May 12, 2009 4:23 PM
    subliferJust wanted to help: transcoding


    Thanks sub: fixed!
  • 0 Hide
    cangelini , May 12, 2009 4:23 PM
    wyvern287Does anyone know if this system can play Hulu videos?


    Yes, you'll be fine with Hulu videos.
  • 0 Hide
    cangelini , May 12, 2009 4:25 PM
    hellwigI almost wish you hadn't even tried playing games on it, but I suppose you needed some sort of comparison for the performance of the ION chipset.How many people will use this as a satellite PC in their homes, and what ever happened to Windows Home Server? I would think you let your central PC/server handle the computing and just use this guy as a remote terminal to stream media to.


    GPU power is one of the main advantages that Nvidia has over Intel's Atom-oriented platforms--it's worth looking at, even if you aren't going to be able to run much on it.
  • 1 Hide
    quantumrand , May 12, 2009 5:30 PM
    The point of a nettop is low power consumption, and a small footprint. Its uses really dont go any further than general office productivity, web browsing, file serving, or maybe as an HTPC.

    As long as you're not planning to use it as a file server or HTPC, you might as well get a netbook and a docking station of some sort. There really wont be much difference in real use performance, but you'll get the added option of portability.
  • 3 Hide
    Anonymous , May 12, 2009 5:45 PM
    and the review with Linux ?
  • 2 Hide
    cangelini , May 12, 2009 6:03 PM
    gotdieseland the review with Linux ?


    At least officially, there are no Linux drivers for Ion yet. That'd make the review a little tough to write ;-)
  • 0 Hide
    vinehoyle , May 12, 2009 6:19 PM
    Granted, we could have done significantly better in the power department had we been a little choosier with our CPU. The Athlon X2 7850 was attractive due to its $69 price tag, 2.8 GHz clock speed, and unlocked multiplier, but its Kuma core is still rated at 95 W. You can dip down to the $60 Athlon X2 5050e (running at 2.8 GHz as well) and cut your maximum TDP down to 45W for $10 less.

    ok, let's pick this statement apart. Tom's has really lost it's way of late, and this is yet another example of what's really wrong. Ok the first obvious mind blowing error here is 5050e @2.8ghz. Unless you plan to overclock it, negating it's 45 TDP effectiveness, it arrives to you at 2.6 ghz.I own one, that's exactly how I know. Course if Tom's had done a review of it, they'd know this..but they didn't...I suppose their too busy writing boatloads of I7 reviews... Now to go farther with this, yeah this might sting a bit I grant ya, but oh well, a person who's considering an Atom Platform or a Low Energy AMD platform, their NOT EVEN LOOKING at a Kuma 95 watt core. Their looking at 45 watt, at most, like that 5050E, or maybe some LE-1600 series. I've said this before, but Tom's needs to start comparing oranges to oranges...what they really did here was compare a kiwi to a grapefruit. Tom's better start thinking or this site will lose it relevance very soon. Hard times are here, and shoppers are indeed shopping like this too. I fully recommend that Tom's redo this article with a proper watt AMD cpu, in this case 5050e or an LE-1600 series. Geeezzzzz..........95 watt kuma??? Roflao!!
  • 2 Hide
    cangelini , May 12, 2009 6:30 PM
    It would have probably been enough to point out the typo ;-) If someone is looking for an Atom platform to use in any of the environments being sold here (gaming, HTPC, or desktop), then the benchmarks should show them that maybe they SHOULD be looking at a Kuma-based Athlon. Or, if they must go mini-ITX, the Zotac board suggested at the end of the story with a Core 2-class chip. Does the fact that the micro-ATX comparison platform used more power under load? If that's your only criteria, sure. But it hardly invalidates all of the other Ion-only observations.

    I actually *used* this board. Why put a bunch of anemic platforms up against each other, suggesting, "Hey, if you're fine with creeping along at 2 MPH, here are five different solutions that'll make you pull your hair out as an anti-virus runs in the background?" The point is that, on the desktop or in a gaming situation, *you can do much, much better.*

    Thanks for the feedback, though! =)
  • -1 Hide
    The Schnoz , May 12, 2009 7:40 PM
    one-shotEveryone down-rates the first post which is posted by the author of the article. I'm not sure if anyone has noticed that yet because I see every author's first post down-rated many times.

    That's us sending a message that we don't like it. Why post a comment with a link to the article we just read on the same page?
  • -1 Hide
    The Schnoz , May 12, 2009 7:50 PM
    I'm thinking about getting the 775 chipset version of this to use with my old 2160. I would like to see a comparison of these two, or something comparable, but I guess that's wishful thinking.
  • 1 Hide
    cangelini , May 12, 2009 7:57 PM
    And btw, we're trying to get rid of that top comment as well--not sure when or what that was added...
Display more comments