Intel talks Meteor Lake AI and efficiency: Head of performance marketing lab is 'most excited' about battery life improvements

Intel
(Image credit: Intel)

Intel's Core Ultra chips (formerly Meteor Lake) launched on December 14th, and are already appearing in laptops you can buy. At Intel's official launch here in New York City, I sat down with Dan Rogers, the head of Intel's performance marketing lab in its Client Computing Group.

Rogers, the former product manager for Alder Lake and Raptor Lake, has a unique job as Intel pushes out its first chips based around AI: figuring out how to tell the story of what these can do, and also measuring their performance for Intel's marketing to the general public (Intel is in the PC business, after all).

Because right now, while Intel (and, let's be frank - AMD, Qualcomm, and Apple) have systems with neural processing units, or NPUs, lots of potential customers don't quite know what they could do with them, or why it would matter. I asked him about how people are supposed to know what an AI PC can do, when they can expect software that will affect their lives, and also learned more about how Intel is benchmarking AI applications internally.

Selling the AI PC

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Andrew E. Freedman
Senior Editor

Andrew E. Freedman is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on laptops, desktops and gaming. He also keeps up with the latest news. A lover of all things gaming and tech, his previous work has shown up in Tom's Guide, Laptop Mag, Kotaku, PCMag and Complex, among others. Follow him on Threads @FreedmanAE and BlueSky @andrewfreedman.net. You can send him tips on Signal: andrewfreedman.01

  • kjfatl
    It looks like all of these parts come from the same mask set. During testing the parts that test good for low power are given the low power SKU. The parts remaining parts are given a high power SKU. At the end of the testing process fuses are blown to configure the part appropriately.
    Reply
  • JamesJones44
    we're actually benchmarking the code paths
    That's what all benchmarking is. Whether it's benchmarking general compute, SMID instructions, FPS, etc. those are "code paths" and benchmarking a specific piece of software against various different hardware configurations. I'm not sure why Intel believes the NPU is any different. Running a ResNet or YOLO model on various NPUs to judge relative performance from one NPU to the next is no different than running a compression test on two different CPUs.
    Reply
  • ThomasKinsley
    The last laptop I got is a decade old and the best battery life was maybe 4 hours? Now it's down to 2, and that's with a fuzzy 1366x768 screen. I might end up checking one of these out if the battery is good.
    Reply
  • endocine
    thermals looked insane on those meteor lake laptop previews, is 106C really OK?
    Reply
  • peachpuff
    Battery life and 115w turbo boost go hand in hand 👌
    Reply
  • syadnom
    It's all even more confusing to the end user. Intel Core Ultra 9 185H? that's a mouthful and what does it mean? And the mix of P and E cores and how that isn't really reflected in the part number is a concern as well. Turbo at 115W? or even 65W?

    I feel like they are sort of trying to copy Apple with a big push into P & E core mixes, but they are still handing us >100W *laptop* CPUs.

    How exactly does this compete with Apple hardware first of all, and then we have upcoming arm64 windows machines that are maybe not quite as fast as Apple's M2 and M3, but they are actually respectable performance and in a fraction of the power envelope. ie, that base 28W is actually max and idle is under 10W.

    Not making this a 'mac' argument, just that Apple showed everyone what is possible and Qualcomm is fighting very very hard to make windows machines that do the same. Intel needs to do a lot better than 28W/65W/115W in a mobile chip or the only things you'll find intel logos on are high end gaming laptops.


    Is intel going to be relegated to high powered desktop and barely portable gaming laptops? These chips simply don't look like 2024's laptop parts to me.
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    peachpuff said:
    Battery life and 115w turbo boost go hand in hand 👌
    Being able to finish a job in less time does help with battery life, especially if the efficiency peak point is higher up the power curve, so if the cpu can use a good amount of power and that helps it to finish a job in far less time it will do so with less total power.

    Also why would you want to be artificially limited to a low power draw on a 8p core system with a decently big iGPU? I understand it for when you are on battery, but why would you want to be forced to use little power when you are on mains?
    Reply
  • Colif
    Some interesting points raised in

    DuNu9K7fDB8
    seems to be a soft launch since nothing out there to test yet.
    Reply
  • bluvg
    Colif said:
    Some interesting points raised in

    DuNu9K7fDB8
    seems to be a soft launch since nothing out there to test yet.
    MLID is a great source and he would likely deny AMD bias, but I think he's let his MTL and general Intel disappointment cause him to lose perspective. For example, at 8:33 in that video, he says MTL is has "gone backwards in efficiency," while simultaneously showing a screenshot of a MTL benchmark from Dave2D showing it's far more efficient than Raptor Lake, almost double the battery life in one case.

    Availability is going to take a bit of time (keep an eye on CES), though a few are available now. He also only occasionally points out that AMD Phoenix and Hawk Point are not that widespread in laptops, either (sadly).
    Reply
  • bluvg
    a handful of devices from MSI, Lenovo, Dell, HP, Asus, Acer, Samsung, Gigabyte, and more launched this week

    Where? I didn't see anything from HP.
    Reply