I paired a cheap $125 PSU with a $3,000 RTX 5090

A Montech Century II 1200W PSU next to an RTX 5090
(Image credit: Future)

When you’re building a new gaming PC or upgrading an existing build, you want to make sure that every dollar is spent optimally and that you’re not spending more than you have to.

The power supply unit is the last place you want to cut if you need to save cash. A low-quality PSU can take out some or all of the components connected to it should it fail, and less efficient units throw off more heat and suck down more power from the wall than a high-end 80 Plus Gold or Platinum unit might.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Jeffrey Kampman
Senior Analyst, Graphics

As the Senior Analyst, Graphics at Tom's Hardware, Jeff Kampman covers everything that has to do with graphics cards, gaming performance, and more. From integrated graphics processors to discrete graphics cards to the hyperscale installations powering our AI future, if it's got a GPU in it, Jeff is on it. 

  • thestryker
    Montech's Century II are definitely the budget leader when it comes to PSUs right now. I genuinely don't think there's a better choice in the range they cover if budget is the driving force behind PSU decision.

    The Cybenetics reports on them:
    850W: https://www.cybenetics.com/evaluations/psus/2813/
    1050W: https://www.cybenetics.com/evaluations/psus/2812/
    1200W: https://www.cybenetics.com/evaluations/psus/2808/
    Reply
  • closs.sebastien
    happily you are just one of the 99% of users....
    users who don't have any melting issue
    no scoop, no big news..
    Reply
  • bit_user
    The premise of this article is fundamentally flawed. N=1 samples prove nothing about risk.

    Nobody would say the existence of one smoker who lives to his mid-80's and doesn't die of lung cancer means that cigarette smoking is safe!

    I'm rather disappointed that such an article passes muster, under the publication's new oversight. If you want to review a cheap powersupply, fine. However, I'd hardly call this a quality PSU review.
    Reply
  • uplink-svk
    Now run it at full load for 10 000 hours straight and You'll see how cheap PSU fares against mid-grade to high-end SKUs'.
    Reply
  • scottslayer
    The premium (easily bypassed) article titled "What sort of power supply do you actually need for an RTX 5090?" by the illustrious Jarred Walton that is posted on this very website states that an 80 plus Gold PSU is the bare minimum recommended, but you should definitely buy and use a Platinum or Titanium if you are spending THOUSANDS of dollars on a graphics card to increase efficiency.

    So the first open bench test was one hour, how long was the case test?
    What is your case, cpu cooler, and fan configuration?
    Reply
  • Udyr
    So we're back to thinking the Cybenetics badge is a measure of quality?

    Regardless of how good or bad is this unit, this reads more like an advertorial.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    A year from now, some unfortunate person will pair a 5090 with a low end PSU.
    Resulting in release of the magic smoke.

    "But Tom's told me it was OK!!!"
    Reply
  • pineappl_e
    uplink-svk said:
    Now run it at full load for 10 000 hours straight and You'll see how cheap PSU fares against mid-grade to high-end SKUs'.
    The updated PSU tier list puts it at an A grade, it's not a cheap PSU either, it's just a good value PSU.
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    USAFRet said:
    A year from now, some unfortunate person will pair a 5090 with a low end PSU.
    Resulting in release of the magic smoke.

    "But Tom's told me it was OK!!!"
    After asking ChatGPT 7 if it's a good idea.
    Reply
  • Jeff Kampman
    Just to reiterate a few things that apparently got lost between the first line of the article and the comments section:

    First and foremost, we reviewed this same unit (or at least the platform), and our testing data shows that it's a high-quality PSU for a low price: https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/power-supplies/montech-century-ii-gold-1050w-atx-3-1-power-supply-review
    Cybenetics (run by a former Tom's editor) looked at this exact unit and came to pretty much the same conclusions: https://www.cybenetics.com/evaluations/psus/2808/
    scottslayer said:
    The premium (easily bypassed) article titled "What sort of power supply do you actually need for an RTX 5090?" by the illustrious Jarred Walton that is posted on this very website states that an 80 plus Gold PSU is the bare minimum recommended, but you should definitely buy and use a Platinum or Titanium if you are spending THOUSANDS of dollars on a graphics card to increase efficiency.

    So the first open bench test was one hour, how long was the case test?
    What is your case, cpu cooler, and fan configuration?

    Under a typical gaming load, the system mentioned in this article is pulling about 700-720W, or about 58% of this PSU's rated capacity. It's about 91% efficient at that point on the efficiency curve, or just shy of 80 Plus Platinum standards.

    The point is that if you are on a limited budget, you are willing to dive into the data, and know about where your system's load falls on this unit's efficiency curve, you can get darn good bang for the buck in exchange for a little time spent on research.

    Nothing about this article contradicts Jarred's advice.

    I'll also reiterate that I bought this unit on my own dime; it's not a review unit or golden sample or payola or anything to that effect:

    a/ck5z4iK
    In short, I had a problem and our coverage surfaced a potential solution to it that I hadn't considered, so I wanted to see if there was a catch. Surprisingly, there was not. If a company wants to sell a product that by all accounts performs like a higher-end unit for an attainable price, value-conscious builders should buy the dip. There's really nothing deeper to it (other than the cheekiness of using an RTX 5090 to illustrate a worst-case scenario).
    Reply