Asus RT-BE96U Wi-Fi 7 router review: A new 6 GHz wireless speed king emerges

The Asus RT-BE96U emerges as a top contender for speed among Wi-Fi 7 routers

Asus RT-BE96U Wi-Fi 7 router
Editor's Choice
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

If you have plenty of 6 GHz gear in your home or simply want to futureproof your network, the Asus RT-BE96U is a wise choice.

Pros

  • +

    Fastest 6 GHz performance I’ve seen yet

  • +

    Adequate ports, including two 10 GbE ports

  • +

    Support for smartphone tethering

  • +

    Wireless Time Machine backups for Mac users

Cons

  • -

    Wi-Fi 7 devices still aren’t mainstream… yet

  • -

    Still expensive at $700

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

I recently had a chance to look at the ROG Rapture GT-BE98 Pro Wi-Fi 7 router, which is a flagship product in Asus’ expansive networking lineup. However, not everyone wants to spend $800 just to join in on the Wi-Fi 7 festivities. Although it won’t save you a large sum, Asus also sells the cheaper RT-BE96U with an MSRP of $700.

The RT-BE96U resembles the more expensive ROG Rapture GT-BE98 Pro but lacks the fancy RGB lighting, includes fewer Ethernet ports, and has only one 6 GHz band instead of two. If you don’t require a ton of physical networking connections yet but still want to enjoy Wi-Fi 7 speeds, you might want to look at this offering.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Brandon Hill
Senior Editor

Brandon Hill is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware. He has written about PC and Mac tech since the late 1990s with bylines at AnandTech, DailyTech, and Hot Hardware. When he is not consuming copious amounts of tech news, he can be found enjoying the NC mountains or the beach with his wife and two sons.

  • bit_user
    Who makes the SoC? My current Netgear router has a Qualcomm SoC, which is a fact they state quite openly. I don't love Qualcomm, but at least I trust them.
    Reply
  • SonoraTechnical
    Uff $700... For that price It should replace my DSL Modem and provide a dedicated VPN Channel for one of the Ports (so that my wife can view Disney+ and Discovery+ on the Roku TV while we are in Mexcio)
    Reply
  • peachpuff
    Strange model number compared to all the previous asus routers.
    Reply
  • SydB
    Asus, fugly, overpriced. Next.
    Reply
  • abufrejoval
    I keep wondering about these antennae...

    For all I understand from physics, the higher the frequency the smaller the waves and the shorter the antennae that transmit and receive them. Those protrusions clearly seem made for the 2.4 GHz band, which is what I'd call last resort or what you really don't want to use, ever, if possible.

    And all those really expensive office building access points very much look like a smoke sensor, no protrusions whatsoever and the most advanced tuneable antenna arrays completely hidden inside...

    So my take on these is that they are mostly, if not completely unnessesary for 5 and 6 GHz bands, unless they did in fact include them there in one tiny corner or another.

    But I don't take well to someone who evidently is trying to fool me with a misleading design that is rather unpractical on top.

    Perhaps TH could do some research and provide a bit of toungue lashing where it is appropriate?
    Reply
  • TheGreatDonkey
    bit_user said:
    Who makes the SoC? My current Netgear router has a Qualcomm SoC, which is a fact they state quite openly. I don't love Qualcomm, but at least I trust them.
    Broadcom BCM4916 - ARM B53 2.6Ghz.
    Reply
  • JamesJones44
    I don't know if I consider 25 feet far, distant maybe. I would be more curious about performance through walls. My current NEGEAR RX120 WiFi 6 router performance drops about 50% simply by going into the next room over a closing the door (about 10 feet away with a wall in between). The overall throughput is still higher than 2.4 GHz, but for something that truly needs high throughput it would be interesting to know how much loss will occur with walls in the mix. I haven't played what a 6 GHz band router yet, but I'm assuming it will suffer more potentially.
    Reply
  • HideOut
    $700 wow.

    And all LAN ports arn't a minimum of 2.5G? again, wow.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    HideOut said:
    And all LAN ports arn't a minimum of 2.5G? again, wow.
    As long as at least one LAN port is at least the same speed as the WAN port, that's better than Netgear can so far manage.
    Reply
  • tamalero
    SonoraTechnical said:
    Uff $700... For that price It should replace my DSL Modem and provide a dedicated VPN Channel for one of the Ports (so that my wife can view Disney+ and Discovery+ on the Roku TV while we are in Mexcio)
    or built a top of the line server grade router with similar capabilities.
    Reply