AMD Fury X And Fiji Preview

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Contributor

Kevin Carbotte is a contributing writer for Tom's Hardware who primarily covers VR and AR hardware. He has been writing for us for more than four years.

  • ern88
    Any idea if it uses HDMI 2.0?
    Reply
  • ern88
    NVM. I see it only uses 1.4 for HDMI!!!
    Reply
  • uroshi
    Does anyone actually have a 4k 60Hz display without DP1,2? So why the fuss about HDMI 2.0 ...
    Reply
  • revanchrist
    Fury Nano = 85-90% of Fury X
    No, this is not speculation. Wccftech claim they're told directly by AMD.
    wccftech.com/amd-radeon-r9-nano-detailed-features-fiji-gpu-175w-tdp-single-8pin-connector-sff-design-faster-hawaii/
    Reply
  • milkod2001
    iDid expect proper benchmarks to be all over Internet on DAY 1 of official announcement. It's Day 2 and we still have only lame preview here :(

    Don't get me wrong im not blaming Tom's for this, just curious what's taking so long? Availability in 6 days and we still don't know what we are getting. Can AMD get one thing right?

    Reply
  • Innocent_Bystander
    The air-cooled cards, by comparison, are expected to scale back as their heat sinks and fans are saturated with thermal energy.

    I like your style. It's called overheating.
    Reply
  • srap
    I am very curious, if this is the Tonga style GCN 1.2 architecture, or they upped it to 1.3; and if so, what changes have been made to it?

    Does anyone actually have a 4k 60Hz display without DP1,2? So why the fuss about HDMI 2.0 ...
    The people who usually complain are the ones with 4k TVs, not 4k monitors.
    And there are the people who complain about the lack of DVI, they are the ones with Korean monitors.
    Reply
  • blackbit75
    "From what we're told, VR will require similar (if not more) performance to sustain at least 90 Hz refresh rates for upcoming HMDs"

    Just marketing, if not, they will not make VR games on Xbox & PS4 in the future, and it will be made.
    In my opinion, if there isn't games yet, it is because games companies sees this technology as a niche, without any successful development yet. More investement to develop games in a market seen as an experiment for them (EA, etc.).

    Depends much, much more on the game, than the characteristics of the GPU. Actual mid-high end GPUs could handle actual games in VR to fit 90FPS, just adjusting settings on the game.
    Reply
  • ern88
    Well, if VR is going to be that demanding. I won't hop on i till it matures. A R9 390X should be sufficent. If it isn't. I'll let the VR boat sail by!!!
    Reply
  • dave_trimble
    The air-cooled cards, by comparison, are expected to scale back as their heat sinks and fans are saturated with thermal energy.

    I like your style. It's called overheating.
    The air-cooled cards, by comparison, are expected to scale back as their heat sinks and fans are saturated with thermal energy.

    I like your style. It's called overheating.
    The air-cooled cards, by comparison, are expected to scale back as their heat sinks and fans are saturated with thermal energy.

    I like your style. It's called overheating.

    I like your style. Do you also describe Nvidia cards, which throttle in exactly the same way when they reach their temperature threshold, as overheating? Or are you equally pedantic across all brands?
    Reply