AMD Navi 32 and Navi 33 Core Counts Purportedly Revealed by Software Update

An update for AMD's ROCm software spotted by @Kepler_L2 has purportedly revealed general specifications for AMD's yet-to-be-announced RDNA 3-based discrete graphics processors codenamed Navi 32 and Navi 33. The rumored core counts of the GPUs may give some clues regarding the performance of AMD's upcoming Radeon RX 7000-series offerings for high-end and mid-range market segments. 

AMD's Navi 32 will feature 60 compute units (3840 stream processors), whereas the Navi 31 chip will pack 32 compute units (2048 stream processors) based on ROCm code exposed over at GitHub. To put the number into context, AMD's range-topping Navi 31 powering the company's Radeon RX 7900 XT and RX 7900 XTX graphics cards has 96 CUs, or 6144 SPs, in its full configuration. 

However, they certainly give us some food for thought. For example, with 62.5% of the core count of Navi 31, the Navi 32 could offer 60%  to 65% of the Radeon RX 7900 XTX's performance at around the same clocks if it is not constrained by memory. Meanwhile, with a third of the core count of the top-of-the-line RDNA 3 chip, the Navi 33 could end up offering 30% to 35% of Radeon RX 7900 XTX performance at the same clocks and without memory bandwidth constraints. 

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • DotNetMaster777
    Open source is really good no matter about secrets of AMD !
    Reply
  • oofdragon
    If the 7600xt isn't at least 6800xt rasterization and 3060 RT this new gen can **. The rumours had that the 7900xt would stomp on the 4090, what happened?
    Reply
  • digitalgriffin
    oofdragon said:
    If the 7600xt isn't at least 6800xt rasterization and 3060 RT this new gen can **. The rumours had that the 7900xt would stomp on the 4090, what happened?
    Clock scaling issues. They couldn't hit 3 GHz as they initially promised.

    Yet another AMD Fail
    Reply