AMD Posts First Loss in Years as Consumer Chip Sales Plummet by 65%

AMD HQ
AMD HQ (Image credit: Shutterstock)

AMD on Tuesday posted its first quarterly loss in years due to weak sales of processors for client PCs. Overall, AMD's chip sales dropped 64%. AMD's data center and gaming hardware shipments remained strong and were flat year-over-year, which is quite an achievement given the slowing purchases of servers and weak demand for gaming hardware among consumers. While AMD's management expects the CPU market to start recovering in the second half of the year, the company's outlook for Q2 is not that optimistic.

Mixed Bag

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • Maybe they had better get serious and bring prices down to where they should be
    Reply
  • ohio_buckeye
    Not so sure the CPUs were the thing. For me on zen 4, the big thing was when you factored in the motherboard and ram costs on top of cpu. One reason I’m sticking to am4 a bit longer.
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    Looky here, Intel isn't the only one eating some losses on some spectacular sales drops!
    Reply
  • AgentBirdnest
    ohio_buckeye said:
    Not so sure the CPUs were the thing. For me on zen 4, the big thing was when you factored in the motherboard and ram costs on top of cpu. One reason I’m sticking to am4 a bit longer.
    Same... the RAM isn't even a big issue for me anymore. The "sweet spot" DDR5 6000 kits are down to around $125 for 32GB; less than half the price compared to when Zen4 launched. And the non-3D CPUs have been reduced to attractive prices.

    The motherboards though, jeez... Anything under $500 is pretty much a downgrade compared to my X570, and that just feels kinda bad. :-\ And most models aren't dropping prices much, if at all.
    Maybe with sales down so much, AMD will finally do something about it, like reimburse board makers for more drastic price drops. (I can dream.)
    Reply
  • Makaveli
    AgentBirdnest said:
    Same... the RAM isn't even a big issue for me anymore. The "sweet spot" DDR5 6000 kits are down to around $125 for 32GB; less than half the price compared to when Zen4 launched. And the non-3D CPUs have been reduced to attractive prices.

    The motherboards though, jeez... Anything under $500 is pretty much a downgrade compared to my X570, and that just feels kinda bad. :-\
    Its always been motherboard pricing.

    Its why I added a 5800X3D to my build and will stay on AM4 until Zen 5 is out. They may refresh the chipset and pricing should be much better for boards in 2024 time frame.

    And totally agreed on your last point.

    I paid $330 for my Asus Prime X570 Pro

    The AM5 version

    ASUS Prime X670E-PRO WIFI $479
    Reply
  • BeedooX
    AgentBirdnest said:
    Same... the RAM isn't even a big issue for me anymore. The "sweet spot" DDR5 6000 kits are down to around $125 for 32GB; less than half the price compared to when Zen4 launched. And the non-3D CPUs have been reduced to attractive prices.

    The motherboards though, jeez... Anything under $500 is pretty much a downgrade compared to my X570, and that just feels kinda bad. :-\
    As someone who's been stuck on a TR2950X and a 5930K, upgrades have been a long time waiting based on the idea of building a couple of gens on the AMD platforms.

    I decided to upgrade the wife's PC (the 5930K), and whilst I could easily get a 5800X3D, I was unable to find an AM4 motherboard I liked (outside US) - assuming AM4 is ramping down.

    In the end, plumped for a 7700X and ASROCK X670E Taichi Carrara motherboard for AU$799 (on offer - but still ouch). I didn't find the RAM too bad at AU$299 for 32GB DDR5 6000 CL30. I spent a lot more than that on my DDR4 memory.
    Reply
  • suryasans
    It seems AMD's stance that DDR4 phased out in a new AM5 platform does not give a good outcome.
    Reply
  • JamesJones44
    That Xilinx purchase looks genesis given the environment we are in on the client side.
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    It's not DDR4 vs DDR5 that's the problem, the problem is that it's not the massive gain of Zen over Bulldozer, Zen 4 is a relatively small gain over Zen 3 for a much higher cost, especially if you already own a Socket AM4 motherboard, but also Socket AM4 products which are still in the chain at a lower cost. Hovering over all of this is global economic chaos which makes computer upgrades sit on the back burner, and all of the people who were AM4 early adopters who were burned and are unwilling to take another chance.
    Reply
  • setx
    suryasans said:
    It seems AMD's stance that DDR4 phased out in a new AM5 platform does not give a good outcome.
    It was completely correct decision. I'd choice longer live for socket with compatibility with newer CPUs anytime over old memory support.

    Getting cheap DDR5-4800 and overclocking it to 6000+ is not a problem.
    Reply