Aorus Gen5 10000 1TB and 2TB SSD Full Specs Revealed

Aorus Gen5 10000 SSDs
(Image credit: Gigabyte)

Gigabyte shared full product pages detailing the features and specifications for its speedy Aorus Gen5 10000 1TB and 2TB SSDs. The larger capacity M.2 drive is capable of up to 10,000 MB/s reads, and 9,500 MB/s writes. In addition, this SSD comes with Gigabyte’s optional M.2 Thermal Guard XTREME heatsink with two heat pipes and stacked fins with a nanocarbon coating, promising to keep thermal throttling to a minimum. However, as you will read later, there are a lot of systems in which this heatsink won’t fit.

(Image credit: Gigabyte)
Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Mark Tyson
News Editor

Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.

  • TechieTwo
    They are just stating that active cooling is best for the SSD though not a necessity. Obviously with an air-cooled CPU there is enough airflow around the SSD to more than cool the heatsink. If you are using an H2O cooler for the CPU then you have less airflow around the SSD. In most cases the mobo maker supplied low profile heatsink should be sufficient.

    You can monitor the SSD temp via S.M.A.R.T if concerned that the SSD might be throttled.
    Reply
  • Friesiansam
    I strongly suspect the "incompatible list" is a long way from being comprehensive.
    Reply
  • simfreak101
    If this is the answer by manufactures, then i predict this will be the death of the M.2 slot;

    Time to move u.2 or u.3 to the consumer market like they did for SATA (from SAS).
    Reply
  • emike09
    I don't really need PCI-e 5.0 speeds. Give me affordable 4 and 8TB Gen4 drives.
    Reply
  • Amdlova
    Just buy a highpoint 650us spend more 600 in ssd put in raid 0 mode call the cops and show your 28.000 mb/s
    Reply
  • Geef
    It should come with a PCI-E expansion card for M.2 drives that rotates the M.2 sideways so the heatsink points away from motherboard.

    Issue resolved.
    Reply
  • bill001g
    Geef said:
    It should come with a PCI-E expansion card for M.2 drives that rotates the M.2 sideways so the heatsink points away from motherboard.

    Issue resolved.
    Except many motherboard do not have pcie5 lanes to all the slots. Many only provide pcie5 lanes to the slot for the GPU.
    I did not read it closely but there is a lot of discussion why they all put the m.2 slot that supports pcie5 so close to the video card. This would not be a problem if they just put the m.2 slot that supported pcie 5x4 farther away from the video card.
    Seems there is some issue running these faster lanes more distance from the cpu chips.
    Reply
  • Math Geek
    as far as i know, it is a latency issue. the further away from the cpu, the higher the latency for data transfer. sure it is very minimal difference, but at those speeds a couple micro seconds changes the game a lot.

    there is no other place to put the slot close to the cpu since the other sides are the vrm's, ram slots, power connections and so on.

    i'd personally like to see them leave a mobo with 2 ram slots (instead of 4 most people don't even populate fully) and then add some type of vertical m.2 slot after the 2 ram slots. could be interesting and allow a lot more room to actively cool it if needed.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    I hope we start seeing more U.2 drives in the consumer space. Those are definitely easier to cool, swap out, and won't interfere with GPUs, etc.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Math Geek said:
    as far as i know, it is a latency issue. the further away from the cpu, the higher the latency for data transfer. sure it is very minimal difference, but at those speeds a couple micro seconds changes the game a lot.
    You know the speed of light is about 300 mm per ns, right? And I've read a conservative estimate of the propagation speed of electric signals in copper is about half that. So, each ~150 mm of copper adds only 1 ns. Minimum NVMe read latency figures are well into the range of microseconds. In other words, it's not about latency.
    Now, it could relate to cost, although I've read that even PCIe 4.0 boards had to use PCIe retimers. So, if we assume they're using retimers either way, then perhaps they could get a little more distance? I dunno.

    Math Geek said:
    there is no other place to put the slot close to the cpu since the other sides are the vrm's, ram slots, power connections and so on.
    Yeah, M.2 slots would seem to complicate board layout, a lot. Yet another reason I don't like 'em.

    Math Geek said:
    i'd personally like to see them leave a mobo with 2 ram slots (instead of 4 most people don't even populate fully)
    I know, right? Especially when Alder Lake had that horrible penalty (reducing from 4800 to 4400) for having a 4-slot board, even when only 2 slots were populated!

    Luckily, I think that issue was resolved in Raptor Lake?

    Math Geek said:
    and then add some type of vertical m.2 slot
    Some server boards even have PCIe slots practically in the middle of the board, well away from the backplane. I'm not sure quite what that's all about.
    Reply