'Assassin's Creed: Syndicate' Benchmarks: A Stressing Experience

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware

Rexly Peñaflorida is a freelance writer for Tom's Hardware covering topics such as computer hardware, video games, and general technology news.

  • FITCamaro
    This is terrible testing. The only common denominator in the tables is the resolution. You have multiple configurations and settings all in one table which makes the results misleading and hard to read.

    Tom's if this is what you have for reviews today you have problems.
    Reply
  • namtrooper81
    I skimmed the article, that is some poor performance from a 980TI. No idea however if the graphics quality warrants such low fps.
    Reply
  • cknobman
    I skimmed the article, that is some poor performance from a 980TI. No idea however if the graphics quality warrants such low fps.

    Easy explanation: Its a sh!t port done by UbiSoft.
    Reply
  • Daniel Ladishew
    While it may be of value to readers to know what settings the game automatically applied based on each systems specs, as a comparison it makes for very difficult reading. Putting all that into a graph and calling it a 'benchmark' is a stretch. I applaud that your using on hand hardware to test new games (gives readers a more realistic set of examples), but find the testing procedure itself lacking for any kind of meaningful comparisons on the hardware itself. You can do better.
    Reply
  • Kwuarter
    Can the text be any more blurry? I'm sorry but it's kind of silly that I have to click on the graph in order to see it properly.
    Reply
  • tstng
    Pretty awful review, there is no consistency, you are testing different cards with different cpu's at different quality settings. It's all a mishmash, not to mention really small and blurry images.

    Also I do have to mention that currently (even with the latest 359.00 drivers) Nvidia's HBAO+ Ultra and PCSS Ultra are murder or any system and MFAA is incompatible with the game (you are forced to turn it off in ncp otherwise you get missing textures and artifacts in the game), so both the drivers and the game optimization are shoddy at best. (Game Ready Driver my posterior) On my 970/i5-2500k I can play 50-60 fps if I use High Shadows (not PCSS) and only HBAO+ (not the Ultra one).
    Reply
  • spentshells
    System 1 should be at least a fury if not fury x for AMD
    Reply
  • jimmysmitty
    17003935 said:
    Pretty awful review, there is no consistency, you are testing different cards with different cpu's at different quality settings. It's all a mishmash, not to mention really small and blurry images.

    Also I do have to mention that currently (even with the latest 359.00 drivers) Nvidia's HBAO+ Ultra and PCSS Ultra are murder or any system and MFAA is incompatible with the game (you are forced to turn it off in ncp otherwise you get missing textures and artifacts in the game), so both the drivers and the game optimization are shoddy at best. (Game Ready Driver my posterior) On my 970/i5-2500k I can play 50-60 fps if I use High Shadows (not PCSS) and only HBAO+ (not the Ultra one).

    I agree the image quality is pretty low but this is not a review. It is a sample benchmark. While I wish they would do a normal full review this is being looked at the wrong way. Think of this as the equivalent of a couple of people on forums poting their specs, settngs and results. It may not give a full idea but it gives somewhat of an idea.

    To me this shows that the game is very poorly optimized. I don't see how a top end i7 and 980Ti should have any issues maxing the game out at 1080P. And I don;t think it is the HBAO or PCSS as I have run games maxed at 1080P with maxed out PCSS/CCSS and HBAO+. Considering their track record, Ubisoft has had a lot of performance issues with their game releases.
    Reply
  • hannibal
    This is not a graphic card comparison, it tells what setting you can use with your hardware in this game.
    And also that this game is seriously power hungry game as it has been said above.
    Reply
  • schiwing
    This is terrible testing.

    Hopefully this doesn't become the new trend for testing.
    Reply