Join for quick access. Enter your email below and we'll send confirmation plus sign you up to our newsletter.
By submitting your information, you confirm you are aged 16 or over,
have read our
Privacy Policy
and agree to the
Terms & Conditions. Geographical rules apply.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Join the club
Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.
An account already exists for this email address, please log in.
Just like busses, leaks tend to come in twos after a long wait, and a member of the Bilibili video sharing community in China has outed some crypto mining performance scores for the GeForce RTX 3050. However, please remember that both the leaks outlined below are unconfirmed, and thus you should add a sprinkling of salt.
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Desktop in 3DMark
Nvidia's upcoming entry-level Ampere gaming graphics card for desktops, the GeForce RTX 3050, looks like it will quite easily outclass the recently released AMD RDNA 2 GPU aimed at a very similar audience, the Radeon RX 6500 XT.
The leaked benchmarks for the GeForce RTX 3050 include 3DMark's most popular tests; FireStrike 1080p, TimeSpy, and TimeSpy Extreme. Additionally, the source compared the GeForce RTX 3050 test results against stablemates such as the GTX 1660 Ti and RTX 3060 and AMD's newest RDNA 2 GPU.
(Image credit: VideoCardz)
To sum up the performance of a GeForce RTX 3050 in one sentence, you could say it is like a GTX 1660 Ti but with DLSS potential. The 3DMark scores are uncannily like the aging GTX 1660 Ti, but the old-timer has a slight edge here of approx 5%. However, if a game uses modern Nvidia graphics tech like DLSS, the newer card will be highly preferable, as will its improved future-proofing with 8GB (vs. 6GB) of VRAM.
Fleshing out and adding context to the tests unearthed by VideoCardz is the RTX 3060 and the RX 6500 XT. The former is between 30% to 50% faster than its brother, and the latter is about 5% to 20% slower. Given the performance differences, it is interesting to see Nvidia has built the RTX 3050 desktop using the same GA106 GPU like the RTX 3060, with various cuts to the spec. You can read our report on precisely how Nvidia trimmed the GeForce RTX 3050 here. It leaves room for an RTX 3050 Ti for desktops, should Nvidia have the spare dies and feel the need.
(Image credit: Asus)
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Desktop in Cryptomining
There is undoubtedly a segment of the readership who will be eyeing the launch of the GeForce RTX 3050 with interest in its crypto mining potential. Unfortunately, the news from the Bilibili source isn't excellent for those folks.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
According to the Bilibili user, called Hipster, the Ethereum hash rate that the new GeForce RTX 3050 is capable of is 13.66 MH/s, and in attaining this performance, the GPU runs at 57W. It compares poorly against the GeForce RTX 3060 LHR, which can hit about 33 MH/s, and of course, the original unrestricted RTX 3060 approaches 50 MH/s (135W).
(Image credit: Hipster on Bilibili)
The RTX 3050 is new, of course, so there is room for optimizations within the mining community, and as with any LHR card, there will be techniques to recover some of that artificially lost performance.
Launch Price Context
Before signing off on this story, it is worth reminding readers that Nvidia has put an official launch price on the RTX 3050 of $249. It is hard to know whether we will see a repeat of the type of price/availability action we just observed with the AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT, but we hope not. If supplies are good and cryptocurrencies continue to get harder to mine and fall in value, we could see an encouraging trend begin next week.
Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.
Not exactly surprising that a GPU with twice as much VRAM, VRAM bandwidth, full 4.0x16 PCIe and intended to succeed the GTX1660 would beat a GPU that AMD pitched against the 4GB RX570.
This was expected. The mining efficiency was not. take official msrp of this card and of the 3090 for instance. $1500 gets you 6 3050s or 1 3090. the 3050s will put out about 82MH/s at 342w compared to about 120MH/s at about 300w for a 3090. it might be poor enough efficiency to see these have slightly better availability. Im not holding my breath, but we can hope right?
