IBM Challenges 3D XPoint With TLC Phase-Change Memory (PCM)

IBM announced that it has developed a method to store three bits of data per cell using Phase-Change Memory (PCM). Intel and Micron set the memory world afire with their 3D XPoint announcement, but they have not revealed the underpinnings of the technology, which many speculate is either ReRAM- or PCM-based. In either case, the IBM PCM products will line up as competitors for 3D XPoint, though the ability to store more data per cell could provide IBM with a cost and density advantage.

The future of data storage will consist of new materials and techniques that bring DRAM-like speed in tandem with the persistence of NAND (that is, it will retain data when power is removed). These new storage mediums will straddle the line between main memory and storage memory, though many are closer to the speed of DRAM than NAND, creating a new class called "Universal Memory" or "Storage-Class Memory." 

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • The Wizzard
    The line "...between crystalline and amorphous states in a chalcogenide (glass-like) alloy" should really read "between crystalline and amorphous (glass-like) states in a chalcogenide alloy" so as not to jumble definitions. Chalcogenides are sulfur, phosphorus et al (incl oxygen but usually not described as such); it does not describe the state of the matter, only it's composition.
    Reply
  • Nuckles_56
    Wake me up when this actually comes to the mass market
    Reply
  • bit_user
    17979082 said:
    ...
    I really appreciate the table, but I wonder about the Energy Per Bit row. Does that represent the amount of energy needed to write a bit? Since few of these technologies are bit-addressable, did you compute the energy needed to write a block and then divide by the bits per block? And why is the range so big, for Flash? 10^1 to 10^14 ...it's very rare to see a range that big, anywhere.

    And why would the units be (pj)^2? That's (pico-Joules)^2, correct?

    Also, the areal density of HDDs could have been included, in the last cell. Even though it's not a chip, it would convey a sense of the relative densities.

    I hadn't been following the development of memristor-based storage products, but now I will!

    Anyway, nice article.
    Reply