Intel Announces Thunderbolt 4 Specification, Debuts with Tiger Lake

14

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • Giroro
    Its basically the of thing, but Intel made the number higher?

    Looks like Intel's executives are still really hard at work earning those giant paychecks.
    Reply
  • shady28
    Giroro said:
    Its basically the of thing, but Intel made the number higher?

    Looks like Intel's executives are still really hard at work earning those giant paychecks.


    Actually pretty useful stuff for the consumer. Unified cabling standards is nice.

    Also, truth in marketing is nice :
    "the new specification requires vendors to enable all of the optional features built into Thunderbolt 3, like the ability to hit the 40Gb/s data throughput requirements and support two 4K displays or one 8K display, in order to qualify for Thunderbolt 4 certification. "
    Reply
  • nofanneeded
    shady28 said:
    Actually pretty useful stuff for the consumer. Unified cabling standards is nice.

    Also, truth in marketing is nice :
    "the new specification requires vendors to enable all of the optional features built into Thunderbolt 3, like the ability to hit the 40Gb/s data throughput requirements and support two 4K displays or one 8K display, in order to qualify for Thunderbolt 4 certification. "

    hahahaha , so being truthful in marketing now needs a new name and a new generation ? Really? so what you are saying is : Intel was cheating in TB 3 and in TB 4 stopped cheating right ?

    be careful dude , if you want vendors to enable all features , while giving the same tech , this is not a new thunderbolt ... it can be done without faking a new name and giving the same thing.
    Reply
  • z3mr2
    the new specification requires vendors to enable all of the optional features built into Thunderbolt 3, like the ability to hit the 40Gb/s data throughput requirements

    So TB3 40Gb is false advertising? Intel knowingly told vendors not to provide the full 40Gb throughput available in Thunderbolt 3 but was advertised as a 40Gb throughput connectivity.

    Another issue, how are we going to differentiate TB3 and TB4 ports and ultimately the cables!
    Reply
  • AnimeMania
    It is just a way to make Apple and AMD look bad since neither of their CPUs will not be able to qualify for the new standard. The latest Thunderbolt standard comes out and Apple can't use it, Most of the people who care about Thunderbolt are Mac users.
    Reply
  • Jennifer W
    I thought USB4 was supposed to incorporate Thunderbolt as well, so we could use a single cable and interface type for both USB & Thunderbolt devices...
    But this sounds like TB4 and USB4 are going to be two completely different things, that just happen to use the same cable/plug type.
    Am I getting that correct?

    If that’s the case, I’m really not as excited for it as I was before.
    Here I was thinking the two would be unified as a single new standard all under USB4.
    Reply
  • spongiemaster
    Jennifer W said:
    I thought USB4 was supposed to incorporate Thunderbolt as well, so we could use a single cable and interface type for both USB & Thunderbolt devices...
    But this sounds like TB4 and USB4 are going to be two completely different things, that just happen to use the same cable/plug type.
    Am I getting that correct?

    If that’s the case, I’m really not as excited for it as I was before.
    Here I was thinking the two would be unified as a single new standard all under USB4.
    USB4 is a subset of TB4, so any usb device that uses the type c connector will work with TB4 ports if you're using a TB4 spec cable, but you can't plug a TB4 device into a USB4 port.
    Reply
  • Jennifer W
    spongiemaster said:
    USB4 is a subset of TB4, so any usb device that uses the type c connector will work with TB4 ports if you're using a TB4 spec cable, but you can't plug a TB4 device into a USB4 port.
    See that’s what I’m getting at. I thought TB4 and USB4 were being merged so that there would only be one port (a type c port) which could accept either TB or USB devices.
    But the way this sounds, there will be a type c port that lets you use TB or USB.... and another that is USB only.
    Reply
  • spongiemaster
    z3mr2 said:
    So TB3 40Gb is false advertising? Intel knowingly told vendors not to provide the full 40Gb throughput available in Thunderbolt 3 but was advertised as a 40Gb throughput connectivity.

    No, chief. The controllers are all capable of 40Gb. What determines the actual transfer speed and feature set is the cable you use and this has always been made crystal clear. Passive copper cables (basically a USB type C cable) are only capable of 20Gb. Active copper is capable of 40Gb up to 6 feet. Active optical are theoretically capable of 40Gb up to 200ft though I don't think anyone sells a cable that long. Also, while copper variants can carry power and support USB C devices, optical cables which also need to use an optical port do not.
    Reply
  • spongiemaster
    Jennifer W said:
    But the way this sounds, there will be a type c port that lets you use TB or USB.... and another that is USB only.
    Correct. If the two standards were exactly the same, what would be the point of having two different names for the same standard?
    Reply