Intel Unveils Comet Lake Processors, 14nm Chips Join 10nm in 10th-Gen Lineup

Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • thegriff
    Intel is really screwing up, now you can't even tell which is the latest process. These comet lakes aren't really any different arch. or node. They have the 10nm process working so produce them for 10 series and leave 9 series for the old gen./arch. and stop ticking people off.
    Reply
  • FunSurfer
    What about spectre mitigation? Any improvements with the new processors?
    Reply
  • logainofhades
    Intel is either trying to purposely confuse people, or is being run very badly.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Intel also says that "some" 10th-Gen models will come with Dynamic Tuning Technology that uses pre-trained AI algorithms to predictively adapt based on usage patterns, but that is a feature of the Ice Lake processors, so Comet Lake users will not get the feature.
    This sounds like another ripe target for side-channel exploits.
    Reply
  • maestro0428
    This is stupidly confusing for the average consumer.
    Reply
  • Groveling_Wyrm
    maestro0428 said:
    This is stupidly confusing for the average consumer.

    The average "Consumer" can't tell you what processor or motherboard they currently have. Asking them to identify the next generations isn't going to confuse them any worse. They only thing most of them will see or hear are keywords like "Intel 10th Generation" or "The newest Intel....".

    Its mostly technocrats such as ourselves, that actually care to identify them, that will be confused.

    The biggest people that Intel is trying to impress are the stockholders. And with any stockholder, you either dazzle them with Intelligence, or Baffle them with BS. We will soon see what Intel is pushing...

    As long as they keep pushing out new processors, and making sale goals, Intel has a lot of free reign to do what they want.
    Reply
  • redgarl
    It just proves that 10nm is in an even worst state as we thought. Intel cannot even supply their chips to OEMs due to yield. They mislead investors by stating that 10nm was not canceled... they released a couple of 4 cores chips just to denied digitime article, however, as of now the article is way more credible than Intel actions.

    https://www.extremetech.com/computing/279306-intel-denies-media-reports-claiming-it-cancelled-its-10nm-process
    Reply
  • gggplaya
    To be fair, AMD does the same thing with their APU's. They continue to call them 3000 series, even though they're still on 12nm.
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    redgarl said:
    They mislead investors by stating that 10nm was not canceled... they released a couple of 4 cores chips just to denied digitime article, however, as of now the article is way more credible than Intel actions.
    Intel makes more than just PC CPUs. I bet Intel/Altera Agilex FPGAs make up a significant chunk of Intel's 10nm manufacturing as those have far larger profit margins than consumer parts. Intel's Xe is also supposed to be on 10nm.

    Makes sense that a process that is so late to market with limited fab capacity (don't remember reading anything about Intel planning to expand 10nm beyond the fabs it developed it at) would be used exclusively for higher margin parts. What wouldn't make sense is scaling up a 10nm DUV process when 7nm EUV is much simpler and likely cheaper.
    Reply
  • TJ Hooker
    redgarl said:
    It just proves that 10nm is in an even worst state as we thought. Intel cannot even supply their chips to OEMs due to yield. They mislead investors by stating that 10nm was not canceled... they released a couple of 4 cores chips just to denied digitime article, however, as of now the article is way more credible than Intel actions.

    https://www.extremetech.com/computing/279306-intel-denies-media-reports-claiming-it-cancelled-its-10nm-process
    But it's not cancelled...
    I don't know what digitimes article you're referring to, but are you claiming that Intel released 10nm CPUs just to prove an article wrong? Really? And you do realize that if Intel had knowingly mislead investors with their statements on 10nm, that would be illegal and grounds for a lawsuit, right?
    Reply