Intel GPU Head: Our Core Audience Wants One Power Connector

Intel
(Image credit: Intel)

This year, Intel made a noteworthy entry into the low-to-mid range discrete GPU market with its A750 and A770 cards, but don't expect the company to start challenging the RTX 4090 or Radeon RX 7900, both of which require a lot of wattage, any time soon. According to Intel Graphics Head Raja Koduri, the company is squarely focused on squeezing as much performance as it can out of a 200 to 225W power limit -- often with a single power connector -- and hopefully enough to compete with the best graphics cards

Priorities

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • bit_user
    while a plan to build a high-end graphics board that would consume around 200W may sound like an unachievable dream given today's standards for gaming-grade graphics cards
    He didn't say anything about what performance tier he was targeting. The way I interpret his statements is to prepare the market for another round of low/mid-range products.

    So far, Intel is lagging on GPU perf/W. They're not going to magically leapfrog the efficiency of AMD and Nvidia in a single generation (if ever).

    "And landing more partners in India who can ship good volumes here at good price points."
    That's interesting. I wonder if it's a response to any pushback they've gotten from Taiwanese board partners. Or, maybe they just want to diversify their supply chain.

    So, what are some Indian GPU card makers?
    Reply
  • SyCoREAPER
    Core audience wants Intel to disrupt AMD and Nvidia.

    So far these dedicated cards are just like their integrated ones; 10 years behind. And the drivers? Embarrassing.

    Less talk, more do.
    Reply
  • jkflipflop98
    I didn't realize the 3060Ti came out 10 years ago. My how time flies.
    Reply
  • TechieTwo
    Obviously if Intel's GPU cards only use 225w there is no need for anything more than a single 8-pin socket. Beyond that power draw they will need a second socket or the single screwball ATX 3.0 cluster socket
    Reply
  • Co BIY
    sycoreaper said:
    Core audience wants Intel to disrupt AMD and Nvidia.

    So far these dedicated cards are just like their integrated ones; 10 years behind. And the drivers? Embarrassing.

    Less talk, more do.

    Arc cards don't appear to be 10 years behind. Close to parity in the Low-Mid market.

    I suspect that Intel is focused on OEM partners who want to sell basic gaming boxes at a basic price. No drama and low RMA rates. The whole system costing less than an 4070 and available off the shelf as an impulse purchase at a big box store.

    Core i5 (OEM cooler) plus Arc 770 on an H-chipset with an easy to reach power target for a low-end PSU. That's a real sweet spot for an integrated system provider.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    You don't have to read his articles, if they don't meet your standards.

    You're also fine to post qualifications, corrections, disagreement, etc. but such direct attacks are out-of-bounds.
    Reply
  • Giroro
    The GTX 1080 Ti was a 250 W card, so it's not like Intel is of targeting some particularly low power envelope.

    As Nvidia struggles with "Bad Grandpa" Jensen's overwhelming greed and diminishing sanity, Intel is smart enough to understand that its hard to sell a 4 slot computer part that's physically incapable of fitting inside most computers. Forget about even trying to find a way to power that toaster.

    Bonus points if if Intel makes a card that can run in a HP Peice of Crap™ without the whole system catching fire. Although, HP and Dell have gotten so downmarket and proprietary that I'd be surprised if they even have a real PCIe slot or single spare power connector.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Giroro said:
    The GTX 1080 Ti was a 250 W card, so it's not like Intel is of targeting some particularly low power envelope.
    Depending on how far back you want to go, we can find top-end cards that used far less. So, that doesn't really count for a whole lot.

    Giroro said:
    Bonus points if if Intel makes a card that can run in a HP Peice of Crap™ without the whole system catching fire. Although, HP and Dell have gotten so downmarket and proprietary that I'd be surprised if they even have a real PCIe slot or single spare power connector.
    If you bought a Dell or HP that didn't already have a PCIe power cable, then the PSU is probably too small and has no extra connectors for one. I think it's common for people with Dells to upgrade the PSU to one from an AlienWare, when they want to install a beefier graphics card.
    Reply
  • LolaGT
    It is almost like Intel knows the market already and that the majority of PC enthusiasts aren't in that 4080 or rx7900 4 digit price point demographic.
    Reply
  • SethNW
    Of course, if you can't compete on performance, then you definitely want to find some other excuse to sell cards. So yeah, it might take Intel few generations to properly compete. And considering that power is their biggest thing, I don't even think their midrange will be that good
    Reply