Intel Ponte Vecchio Seemingly Offers 2.5x Higher Performance Than Nvidia's A100

Ponte Vecchio
Ponte Vecchio (Image credit: Raja Koduri/Twitter)
7

Intel has detailed the company's Ponte Vecchio Xe-HPC GPU at Hot Chips 34. In the provided benchmarks, the chipmaker claims that Ponte Vecchio delivers up to 2.5x more performance than the Nvidia A100. But, as customary, take vendor-provided benchmarks with a pinch of salt.

Ponte Vecchio outperformed the A100 by significant margins in several Intel-selected benchmarks. Intel's powerhouse also flaunted a 2x lead in miniBUDE and 1.5x in ExaSMR. It's an interesting comparison considering that Ponte Vecchio isn't even out yet, and A100 (Ampere) has been on the market since 2020. And let's not forget that AMD's Instinct MI250X (Aldebaran) is reportedly three times faster than the A100. So Intel should worry about AMD and Nvidia's next-generation HPC products.

Zhiye Liu
News Editor, RAM Reviewer & SSD Technician

Zhiye Liu is a news editor, memory reviewer, and SSD tester at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.

  • dalek1234
    Can anyone actually believe Intel? Intel lives on a bed of lies. Probably bathes in it, too. Sooo....
    Reply
  • Jimbojan
    dalek1234 said:
    Can anyone actually believe Intel? Intel lives on a bed of lies. Probably bathes in it, too. Sooo....
    Aren't you just lying?
    Reply
  • Eximo
    Seems reasonable. A huge multi-chiplet GPU vs an older , smaller design and likely a process node shrink in there somewhere.
    Reply
  • jkflipflop98
    dalek1234 said:
    Can anyone actually believe Intel? Intel lives on a bed of lies. Probably bathes in it, too. Sooo....

    This isn't a movie and the underdog isn't going to win in the end. Just FYI.
    Reply
  • rtoaht
    dalek1234 said:
    Can anyone actually believe Intel? Intel lives on a bed of lies. Probably bathes in it, too. Sooo....
    Calm down and take your meds.
    Reply
  • JayNor
    pvc matrix performance , 1678 TOPS int8 and 839 TFLOPS bfloat16

    AMD's MI250X is reported to do 383TF BF16. Int8 performance is also reported to be 383TOPs.

    so, yeah, more than double the bf16 performance, which is meaningful for ai training. Appears to be playing a bigger part in hpc.

    Looks like more than 4x the int8 performance.
    Reply
  • ddcservices
    jkflipflop98 said:
    This isn't a movie and the underdog isn't going to win in the end. Just FYI.
    Have you checked out the Intel quarterly report plus forecast for the rest of the year? Intel doesn't even think it will do well.
    Reply