RTX 4000 SFF Delivers RTX 3060 Ti-Like Performance at 65% Lower Power

Nvidia RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Nvidia RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation (Image credit: PNY)

Nvidia's RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation graphics card targets compact workstations, so it's unlikely that you'll find it on the list of best graphics cards for gaming. That doesn't mean that the graphics card sucks, though. A recent review from the Japanese publication Jisaku Hibi shows the RTX 4000 SFF performing very close to a GeForce RTX 3060 Ti,  with 65% lower power consumption.

The RTX 4000 SFF comes with the AD104 silicon, which powers the GeForce RTX 4070 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. However, the RTX 4000 SFF's die only has 48 fully-enabled Streaming Multiprocessors (SMs) out of the 60. This puts the Ada Lovelace graphics card's CUDA core count at 6,144, 4.5% more than a GeForce RTX 4070 but 20% less than the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. In addition, the RTX 4000 SFF is a workstation graphics card with a small form factor; therefore, gaming isn't its top priority. 

At 70W, the RTX 4000 SFF comes with very modest clock speeds. The graphics card operates with a 1,290 MHz base clock and can boost up to 1,565 MHz. However, the amount of memory on the RTX 4000 SFF is its strongest suit. The graphics card comes with a whopping 20GB of GDDR6 memory. 

Sadly, the memory bandwidth doesn't do the graphics card justice. Limited to a 160-bit memory interface, the RTX 4000 SFF's 14 Gbps GDDR6 memory chips can only deliver a memory bandwidth of up to 280 GB/s.

Jisaku Hibi's gaming-focused review on the RTX 4000 SFF puts the Ada-based graphics card through its paces in 15 titles, such as Cyberpunk 2077, Marvel's Guardians of the Galaxy, Death Stranding, and others. The publication tested the RTX 4000 SFF across three resolutions with different image fidelity settings.

Nvidia RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation Benchmarks

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Graphics Card1920 x 1080 Gaming2560 x 1440 Gaming3840 x 2160 Gaming
GeForce RTX 4070155%164%170%
GeForce RTX 3070121%126%133%
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti110%113%0%
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation100%100%100%
GeForce RTX 3060 12GB83%86%0%
GeForce RTX 3050 (∼ RTX A2000)61%62%0%

The GeForce RTX 4070 outperformed the RTX 4000 SFF by a considerable margin. The last-generation GeForce RTX 3070 had no problems besting the Ada-powered workstation graphics card, either. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, a SKU Nvidia is rumored to be discontinued, was a bit faster than the RTX 4000 SFF, the margins were less than 15%. It shows goes to show the prowess of Nvidia’s Ada Lovelace architecture.

Remember that the the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a 200W graphics card. Therefore, it is very impressive how the margin between the RTX 4000 SFF and the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti wasn’t very significant despite the former having a 65% lower TDP.

The GeForce RTX 3060, which is a 170W SKU, isn’t a pushover, either. Nonetheless, the RTX 4000 SFF surpassed the Ampere graphics card by a comfortable margin (20% average). When it comes to generation-over-generation uplifts, the RTX 4000 SFF, on average, was about 70% faster than the RTX A2000, whose performance is similar to that of the mainstream GeForce RTX 3050.

The RTX 4000 SFF has a MSRP of $1,250 so no one in their mind would purchase it for gaming. Nonetheless, it’s good to know that the RTX 4000 SFF is a capable gaming graphics card when professionals need to take some R&R time from their work.

Zhiye Liu
RAM Reviewer and News Editor

Zhiye Liu is a Freelance News Writer at Tom’s Hardware US. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.

  • InvalidError
    The RTX 4000 SFF has a MSRP of $1,250 so no one out of their mind would purchase it for gaming.
    Actually, you would need to be out of your mind to buy one for gaming.. Unless you are aiming for the best possible performance-per-watt for a specific reason.
    Reply
  • Firestone
    $1250 is not a lot of money. I spend more than that every month on beer and Starbucks and candles. Maybe I'll try getting some of these tiny graphics cards instead.
    Reply
  • Metal Messiah.
    Limited to a 160-bit memory interface, the RTX 4000 SFF's 14 Gbps GDDR6 memory chips can only deliver a memory bandwidth of up to 280 GB/s.

    It appears that this card has different specs, especially the bandwidth value, which is stated as 320 GB/s in some spec sheets, whereas 280 on others. I checked multiple websites/vendor sites like PNY, Leadtek, and there are conflicting bandwidth values.

    I think this could be due to card using either 14 Gbps GDDR6 memory chips, or 16 Gbps. Which would give us the exact bandwidth value of 280 or 320 GB/s. Maybe there are 2 SKUs Nvidia is selling.

    But I'm sure there are 2 variants in the market. Which is kind of weird, since there has been no official confirmation from NVIDIA on the usage of different memory chips.

    https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/3DNcekHKAYsPg3Fy8dhPJV-970-80.png
    Here it says 280GB/s.

    https://www.nvidia.com/content/dam/en-zz/Solutions/rtx-4000-sff/proviz-rtx-4000-sff-ada-datasheet-2616456-web.pdf
    Reply
  • thisisaname
    Tested for gaming performance but they did not try to overclock it, very disappointed! :geek:
    Reply
  • newtechldtech
    Ok Nvidia ! now can you please release the SFF gaming card version please ?
    Reply
  • colossusrage
    Firestone said:
    $1250 is not a lot of money. I spend more than that every month on beer and Starbucks and candles. Maybe I'll try getting some of these tiny graphics cards instead.
    If I could go without Starbucks and candles for one month I could get one, but I don't think I have the will power.
    Reply
  • anbello262
    Out of curiosity, are you being serious or sarcastic?
    Reply
  • D/ACE
    Firestone said:
    $1250 is not a lot of money. I spend more than that every month on beer and Starbucks and candles. Maybe I'll try getting some of these tiny graphics cards instead.
    That would be a good invest!
    Reply
  • mikeebb
    The missing point here: this could be the long-missing (since the GTX 1050ti & 1650) low-power, low-end of the current GPU line for those who can't or don't want to use the GPU as a room heater. Not clear, though, whether it in fact runs entirely from the PCIe bus, not needing a separate power connector. At 70W, it should. Unfortunately, the price is kind of ridiculous for such a GPU.

    Also not clear: is this just a laptop part repackaged on a PCIe card?
    Reply