Nvidia's Tiny RTX 4000 SFF 20GB Offers RTX 3070 Performance at 70W

Nvidia
(Image credit: Nvidia)

There are loads of compact modern workstations that pack quite capable CPUs, but at the same time they lack the space to accommodate a standard high-performance workstation-grade graphics card. That typically limits them to entry-level GPUs with mediocre performance. For those that want a compact SFF workstation with more graphics oomph, Nvidia has introduced a new ProViz-oriented RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation graphics card. It's one of the more interesting offerings in the recent years, packing a high-end GPU into a low-profile form-factor, with a power consumption of just 70W.

The Nvidia RTX 4000 SFF Ada board uses the company's AD104 graphics processing unit with 6144 CUDA cores enabled (out of 7680 in total). That's the same GPU as the RTX 4070 Ti but with fewer active cores, and the boost frequency gets capped at around 1560 MHz to lower total board power. On the other hand, the graphics card comes with 20GB of GDDR6 memory with ECC that connects to the GPU using a 160-bit interface, so lots of memory for workstation use.

The GPU comes with two NVENC encoders and two NVDEC decoders activated, though Nvidia has not touched upon exact capabilities of these units. They should be similar to the NVENC and NVDEC used in other Ada cards, and you can see the video encoding performance and quality in our recent roundup of GPUs.

The GA104 chip in this configuration delivers peak single precision performance of 19.2 TFLOPS, making it theoretically comparable to a GeForce RTX 3070. It has peak RT performance of 44.3 TFLOPS, and peak FP8/INT8 tensor performance of 306.8 TFLOPS/TOPS.

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • thisisaname
    Less performance that a 4070 for more than a 4080, that is Nvidia :eek:

    Not sure why you would compare it with a 3090Ti tech should get better and cheaper. Not better and more expensive else it is not progress.
    Reply
  • Eximo
    Quadro are always more expensive, so not sure that is a fair comment.

    RTX A2000 is popular card because it is basically an RTX2060 that operates also 70W and is low profile capable.

    If this one sells poorly, maybe it will also come down in price and become the new SFF card of choice.
    Reply
  • Loadedaxe
    thisisaname said:
    Less performance that a 4070 for more than a 4080, that is Nvidia :eek:

    Not sure why you would compare it with a 3090Ti tech should get better and cheaper. Not better and more expensive else it is not progress.

    Its a workstation card, Quadros are always more expensive...certified drivers are very expensive.
    Reply
  • edmiri
    20 gb of vram is just enough to fail at deep learning so you'll have to buy ar 3090 or 4090 series
    Reply
  • ingtar33
    thisisaname said:
    Less performance that a 4070 for more than a 4080, that is Nvidia :eek:

    Not sure why you would compare it with a 3090Ti tech should get better and cheaper. Not better and more expensive else it is not progress.

    It has ECC memory, which makes it a Quadro without the name "quadro"
    Reply
  • Amdlova
    Cheap... Performance wise 70w is insane :) I want one
    Reply
  • healthy Pro-teen
    Amdlova said:
    Cheap... Performance wise 70w is insane :) I want one
    I hope this ends up being sold cheap on Ebay soon. Also RX 7900XT 20GB or RTX 4070Ti at 70Watts would be the same if not better at 70 Watts. They have more cores but that also means lower clocks that ultimately lead to higher efficiency. Just like RTX 4090 limited to 285Watts is a lot more efficient than 4070Ti at 285Watts. Only problem is no one makes Tiny 4070Tis and 7900XTs.
    Reply
  • RedQueen570
    thisisaname said:
    Less performance that a 4070 for more than a 4080, that is Nvidia :eek:

    Not sure why you would compare it with a 3090Ti tech should get better and cheaper. Not better and more expensive else it is not progress.


    Your work should get better and your wages lower or it's not progress. Sound stupid? Yeah, it does. Just like your comment.

    More productivity should come at a cost. And for the end user, 300w vs 70w (times countless employees) will payoff that GPU cost over time. This isn't some low-wage-earning couch potato gamer card.

    Imagine me penalizing your paycheck because you did 8hrs of work in 4 hrs. What do you value more? Time, or your money? Anyone wanting to be productive values time over money. Those who can work faster deserve more money, not less. Working faster than yesterday IS progress.
    Reply
  • RedQueen570
    edmiri said:
    20 gb of vram is just enough to fail at deep learning so you'll have to buy ar 3090 or 4090 series

    Most NLP workstation loads (the most demanding of AI), including GPT-4 training, can be done under 10GB and 12GB. That also applies to stable diffusion too.

    This isn't an enterprise card designed for production-class workloads on a server doing training and/or nference for thousands of users at a time.

    Also, most ML/AI training and inference (with the exception of NLP) can still be done on 12GB (x2) K80, albeit slower. Heck, a whole lot of ML work can still be done on a 1080ti. Ask me how I know.

    Not a Kaggle user, are you?
    Reply
  • RedQueen570
    Loadedaxe said:
    Its a workstation card, Quadros are always more expensive...certified drivers are very expensive.

    At least someone around here knows and understands this isn't a game's play toy. I don't even think the writer of this article even does. On the plus side, at least they didn't compare it to any AMD cards like unproductive couch potato gamers have.
    Reply