AMD dominates chip sales on Amazon — top ten best selling CPUs all come from Team Red, Intel’s highest entry sits at 11th place

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

AMD has recently been on a roll with its desktop chips, growing its desktop processor market share to 28.7% in 3Q24 versus 15.8% just five years prior. This is a stunning 81% jump for AMD, and all at the expense of Intel. You can see evidence of this for yourself when you look at the best-selling CPUs on Amazon, with the top 10 spots held by AMD processors from the Ryzen 5000, 7000, and 9000 processor series. Intel sits awkwardly at 11th place, with its Intel Core i7-13700K, a processor two generations behind its latest parts.

Some might argue that the Intel Core Ultra 200 chips are too new to penetrate Amazon’s bestseller list, but AMD’s premier gaming chip, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, has launched just this month and it’s already at pole position. This is despite the massive demand that drove prices up to more than $600 (from the original launch price of $479). If that is out of your range, you could go for the previous generation Ryzen 7 7800X3D, which sits at the number two spot and has a far more accessible asking price of $349.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
SpotProcessorCurrent PriceLaunch PriceLaunch Date
#1AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D$749.99$479.00November 2024
#2AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D$349.00$449.00April 2023
#3AMD Ryzen 9 5900X$226.96$549.00November 2020
#4AMD Ryzen 5 7600X$194.00$299.00September 2022
#5AMD Ryzen 5 5600X$105.00$299.00November 2020
#6AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D$200.00$249.00January 2024
#7AMD Ryzen 7 5700X$130.00$299.00April 2022
#8AMD Ryzen 7 7700X$266.43$399.00September 2022
#9AMD Ryzen 7 5800X$161.99$449.00November 2020
#10AMD Ryzen 5 5500$83.58$159.00April 2022

At number three, we have the four-year-old Ryzen 9 5900X, costing $226 — this is 60% off its launch price, making it a tempting deal for budget-conscious buyers who still want 24-threads of performance. It even outsells the Ryzen 9 5900XT, which launched this year but is more expensive at $308. The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X, priced at $194, sits in fourth place, while the older 12-thread (and cheaper, at $105) Ryzen 5 5600X is one place behind at fifth place.

Spots six through ten in the Amazon CPU bestseller list are rounded out by the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D, Ryzen 7 5700X, Ryzen 7 7700X, Ryzen 7 5800X, and Ryzen 5 5500. These processors give buyers a wide range of options — the cheapest processor starts at less than $100 and those who have the money could splurge more than $500, allowing you to get the best CPU for gaming in your budget.

What’s interesting, though, is that there’s only one Ryzen 9000 series processor here. This is probably because of the disappointing benchmark results returned by the non-X3D variants at launch, with the company soon releasing a patch to fix the issue. Nevertheless, this small hiccup is nothing compared to the major headache that Intel has experienced with its high-end Raptor Lake and Raptor Lake Refresh desktop chips.

TOPICS
Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • valthuer
    Congrats to AMD for the well-deserved top spot!

    As for Intel, they are going through a disastrous period - and they only have themselves to blame, in several instances. They denied the CPU instability scandal for months. They also unashamedly blamed motherboard vendors. Instead of reacting swiftly, they allowed internet reports to fester.

    They have been wounded on several fronts and only the government can save them.
    Reply
  • thisisaname
    With all of Intels problems they still have more than double AMD's market share, it will be impressive if Intel's market share does not rebound next year.
    Reply
  • Dr3ams
    I'm on the fence about upgrading to an AM4 Ryzen 9 5900X. Right now they are cheaper than the original price of the 5600X. I don't really need it, but it would allow me to continue using the AM4 platform for several more years.
    Reply
  • spongiemaster
    valthuer said:
    Congrats to AMD for the well-deserved top spot!

    As for Intel, they are going through a disastrous period - and they only have themselves to blame, in several instances. They denied the CPU instability scandal for months. They also unashamedly blamed motherboard vendors. Instead of reacting swiftly, they allowed internet reports to fester.

    They have been wounded on several fronts and only the government can save them.
    Despite continuously punching themselves in the face for years, Intel's Client Computing Group is still generating more profits than AMD's Client group generates revenue. Intel's financials aren't in such an awful state because of their desktop CPU's.


    Here is AMD:

    For those keeping score at home, Intel generated $2.5 billion in profits from $7.5 billion in revenue, while AMD generated $89 million from $1.5 billion in revenue.

    This is why Intel has no interest in developing a 3DVcache competitor. The enthusiast/DIY market generates an irrelevant amount of revenue/profits compared to the global computing market. Dominating Amazon CPU sales is not a very good indicator of how well AMD is doing in the overall market.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    Dr3ams said:
    I'm on the fence about upgrading to an AM4 Ryzen 9 5900X. Right now they are cheaper than the original price of the 5600X. I don't really need it, but it would allow me to continue using the AM4 plarform for several more years.
    I think the regular AM4 CPUs will likely be around for a while longer since AMD doesn't have many value options on AM5. If gaming is a consideration then a 5700X3D might make sense given how much better the X3D parts are at it than non. Given that these are generally lower volume I wouldn't be as confident on them being around.
    Reply
  • shady28
    thestryker said:
    I think the regular AM4 CPUs will likely be around for a while longer since AMD doesn't have many value options on AM5. If gaming is a consideration then a 5700X3D might make sense given how much better the X3D parts are at it than non. Given that these are generally lower volume I wouldn't be as confident on them being around.

    Honestly just from a money making perspective, If I were at AMD and needed to put resources to where the money engines are it would be data center and AI. Client is really more of a mindshare thing.
    Reply
  • SunMaster
    AM4 has been an amazing platform/socket. I wonder if AM5 will do equally well - if Zen 6 and 3d cache materialize for AM5 in a couple of years. Two consumer sockets in 10 years (will be 10 in two years) is extremely nice compared to the competition.
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    5600x being 5th is lower than i expected. its the best amd4 bang for the buck.

    meanwhile shocked 5800x even made list. 5700x is basically the same thing w/o the high temps after an OC.
    Reply
  • Math Geek
    Dr3ams said:
    I'm on the fence about upgrading to an AM4 Ryzen 9 5900X. Right now they are cheaper than the original price of the 5600X. I don't really need it, but it would allow me to continue using the AM4 platform for several more years.

    dropping in a 5900x vs a 5600x is only a good idea if you need the extra threads. not really any single core performance gains to be had (well not enough to justify the cost). but if you need the extra cores/threads, then it's a no brainer. cheaper than a full upgrade to AM5 or intel's newest and gets you a few more years easy enough before needing new ram and all the rest that goes with a new socket/platform.

    i've got a 5900x myself and don't think they'll be any need to upgrade for a least a few more years.
    Reply
  • wingfinger
    Do the newer models have fewer firmware issues? One issue that was reported was that the firmware TMP was buggy. I think the linux people mentioned that there are issues that they have to work around and/or features that have to be avoided.

    There also seem to be quite a few firmware updates, right?
    Reply